CO2激光与双功能粘结剂联合用于复合树脂老化1年后修复的评价。

Alexandre Morais, Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira, Luiz Henrique Cabral Oliveira, Ravana Angelini Sfalcin, Aldo Brugnera-Júnior, André Guaraci DeVito-Moraes, Maria Cristina Chavantes, Sandra Kalil Bussadori
{"title":"CO2激光与双功能粘结剂联合用于复合树脂老化1年后修复的评价。","authors":"Alexandre Morais,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira,&nbsp;Luiz Henrique Cabral Oliveira,&nbsp;Ravana Angelini Sfalcin,&nbsp;Aldo Brugnera-Júnior,&nbsp;André Guaraci DeVito-Moraes,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Chavantes,&nbsp;Sandra Kalil Bussadori","doi":"10.1089/photob.2021.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> to evaluate the bond strength of repairs to composite resin restorations treated with CO<sub>2</sub> laser and bifunctional monomers after 1 year of aging. <b><i>Background:</i></b> Adequate bond strength between a composite restoration and resin repair agent can be achieved through mechanical and/or chemical treatment. However, the longevity of such repairs is unknown. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Resin blocks (volume: 125 mm<sup>3</sup>) were created. Failure surfaces were either not treated or were treated before the repair with a universal adhesive, a silane bonding agent and/or CO<sub>2</sub> laser. The blocks were distributed into six groups (<i>n</i> = 6 per group): resin+resin group (RRG), universal adhesive+resin group (ARG), silane+universal adhesive group (SAG), laser+silane+universal adhesive group (LSAG), laser+universal adhesive group (LAG), and laser+silane group (LSG). After treatment, repairs were made with another resin composite. \"Sticks\" (1.0 mm<sup>2</sup> in area and 1.0 cm in length) were cut from the specimens in each group and immersed in distilled water at 37°C. Microtensile bond strength was evaluated after 1 year of aging. Bond strength values were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Bond strength was significantly higher in the LSAG compared with the RRG, adhesive system, LSG, whereas statistically similar results were found for the SAG, LSAG, and LAG. Bond strength was lowest in the RRG. The LSAG and LAG presented predominantly cohesive fractures. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The bond strength of composite resin repairs was satisfactory over time. Treatment with CO<sub>2</sub> laser contributed to the maintenance of bond strength during the 1-year storage period and bifunctional monomers present in the universal adhesive on the irradiated repair surface were of fundamental importance to the maintenance of bond strength values, as demonstrated by microtensile bond test and fracture pattern analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20111,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"818-825"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Combination of CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Bifunctional Bonding Agents for Composite Resin Repairs After 1 Year of Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Morais,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Cabral Oliveira,&nbsp;Luiz Henrique Cabral Oliveira,&nbsp;Ravana Angelini Sfalcin,&nbsp;Aldo Brugnera-Júnior,&nbsp;André Guaraci DeVito-Moraes,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Chavantes,&nbsp;Sandra Kalil Bussadori\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2021.0133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> to evaluate the bond strength of repairs to composite resin restorations treated with CO<sub>2</sub> laser and bifunctional monomers after 1 year of aging. <b><i>Background:</i></b> Adequate bond strength between a composite restoration and resin repair agent can be achieved through mechanical and/or chemical treatment. However, the longevity of such repairs is unknown. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Resin blocks (volume: 125 mm<sup>3</sup>) were created. Failure surfaces were either not treated or were treated before the repair with a universal adhesive, a silane bonding agent and/or CO<sub>2</sub> laser. The blocks were distributed into six groups (<i>n</i> = 6 per group): resin+resin group (RRG), universal adhesive+resin group (ARG), silane+universal adhesive group (SAG), laser+silane+universal adhesive group (LSAG), laser+universal adhesive group (LAG), and laser+silane group (LSG). After treatment, repairs were made with another resin composite. \\\"Sticks\\\" (1.0 mm<sup>2</sup> in area and 1.0 cm in length) were cut from the specimens in each group and immersed in distilled water at 37°C. Microtensile bond strength was evaluated after 1 year of aging. Bond strength values were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's test. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Bond strength was significantly higher in the LSAG compared with the RRG, adhesive system, LSG, whereas statistically similar results were found for the SAG, LSAG, and LAG. Bond strength was lowest in the RRG. The LSAG and LAG presented predominantly cohesive fractures. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The bond strength of composite resin repairs was satisfactory over time. Treatment with CO<sub>2</sub> laser contributed to the maintenance of bond strength during the 1-year storage period and bifunctional monomers present in the universal adhesive on the irradiated repair surface were of fundamental importance to the maintenance of bond strength values, as demonstrated by microtensile bond test and fracture pattern analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"818-825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2021.0133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2021.0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价CO2激光与双功能单体复合树脂修复体老化1年后修复体的结合强度。背景:复合修复体和树脂修复剂之间的适当结合强度可以通过机械和/或化学处理来实现。然而,这种修复的寿命是未知的。方法:制作树脂块(体积:125 mm3)。损坏表面要么不处理,要么在修复前使用通用粘合剂、硅烷粘合剂和/或CO2激光进行处理。块体分为6组(每组n = 6):树脂+树脂组(RRG)、万能胶+树脂组(ARG)、硅烷+万能胶组(SAG)、激光+硅烷+万能胶组(LSAG)、激光+万能胶组(LAG)、激光+硅烷组(LSG)。处理后,用另一种树脂复合材料进行修复。从各组标本上切下“棒状”(面积1.0 mm2,长度1.0 cm),浸泡在37℃蒸馏水中。老化1年后评估微拉伸粘结强度。采用Kruskal-Wallis试验和Dunn试验比较粘结强度值。结果:LSAG的粘结强度明显高于RRG、粘接系统、LSG,而SAG、LSAG和LAG的结果具有统计学上的相似性。RRG的粘结强度最低。LSAG和LAG以内聚性骨折为主。结论:复合树脂修复体的粘接强度随时间的推移是令人满意的。CO2激光处理有助于在1年的保存期内保持粘接强度,微拉伸粘接测试和断裂模式分析表明,辐照修复表面的通用粘合剂中存在的双功能单体对保持粘接强度值至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Combination of CO2 Laser and Bifunctional Bonding Agents for Composite Resin Repairs After 1 Year of Aging.

Objective: to evaluate the bond strength of repairs to composite resin restorations treated with CO2 laser and bifunctional monomers after 1 year of aging. Background: Adequate bond strength between a composite restoration and resin repair agent can be achieved through mechanical and/or chemical treatment. However, the longevity of such repairs is unknown. Methods: Resin blocks (volume: 125 mm3) were created. Failure surfaces were either not treated or were treated before the repair with a universal adhesive, a silane bonding agent and/or CO2 laser. The blocks were distributed into six groups (n = 6 per group): resin+resin group (RRG), universal adhesive+resin group (ARG), silane+universal adhesive group (SAG), laser+silane+universal adhesive group (LSAG), laser+universal adhesive group (LAG), and laser+silane group (LSG). After treatment, repairs were made with another resin composite. "Sticks" (1.0 mm2 in area and 1.0 cm in length) were cut from the specimens in each group and immersed in distilled water at 37°C. Microtensile bond strength was evaluated after 1 year of aging. Bond strength values were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's test. Results: Bond strength was significantly higher in the LSAG compared with the RRG, adhesive system, LSG, whereas statistically similar results were found for the SAG, LSAG, and LAG. Bond strength was lowest in the RRG. The LSAG and LAG presented predominantly cohesive fractures. Conclusions: The bond strength of composite resin repairs was satisfactory over time. Treatment with CO2 laser contributed to the maintenance of bond strength during the 1-year storage period and bifunctional monomers present in the universal adhesive on the irradiated repair surface were of fundamental importance to the maintenance of bond strength values, as demonstrated by microtensile bond test and fracture pattern analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信