ICD-11中的人格障碍诊断:转变概念和实践。

Q2 Psychology
Michaela A Swales
{"title":"ICD-11中的人格障碍诊断:转变概念和实践。","authors":"Michaela A Swales","doi":"10.32872/cpe.9635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Until the advent of the ICD-11, classification of personality disorders was based on categorical prototypes with a long history. These prototypes, whilst familiar, were not based in the science of personality. Prototypical classifications were also complex to administer in non-specialist settings requiring knowledge of many signs and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article introduces the new structure of ICD-11 for personality disorders, describing the different severity levels and trait domain specifiers. Case studies illustrate the main aspects of the classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new ICD-11 system acknowledges the fundamentally dimensional nature of personality and its disturbances whilst requiring clinicians to make categorical decisions on the presence or absence of personality disorder and severity (mild, moderate or severe). The connection between normal personality functioning and personality disorder is established by identifying five trait domain specifiers to describe the pattern of a person's personality disturbance (negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, and anankastia) that connect to the <i>Big 5</i> personality traits established in the broader study of personality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst new assessment measures have been and are in development, the success of the new system will rely on clinicians and researchers embracing the new system to conceptualise and describe personality disturbances and to utilise the classification in the investigation of treatment outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"4 Spec","pages":"e9635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881116/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality Disorder Diagnoses in ICD-11: Transforming Conceptualisations and Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Michaela A Swales\",\"doi\":\"10.32872/cpe.9635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Until the advent of the ICD-11, classification of personality disorders was based on categorical prototypes with a long history. These prototypes, whilst familiar, were not based in the science of personality. Prototypical classifications were also complex to administer in non-specialist settings requiring knowledge of many signs and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article introduces the new structure of ICD-11 for personality disorders, describing the different severity levels and trait domain specifiers. Case studies illustrate the main aspects of the classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new ICD-11 system acknowledges the fundamentally dimensional nature of personality and its disturbances whilst requiring clinicians to make categorical decisions on the presence or absence of personality disorder and severity (mild, moderate or severe). The connection between normal personality functioning and personality disorder is established by identifying five trait domain specifiers to describe the pattern of a person's personality disturbance (negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, and anankastia) that connect to the <i>Big 5</i> personality traits established in the broader study of personality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst new assessment measures have been and are in development, the success of the new system will rely on clinicians and researchers embracing the new system to conceptualise and describe personality disturbances and to utilise the classification in the investigation of treatment outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology in Europe\",\"volume\":\"4 Spec\",\"pages\":\"e9635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology in Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.9635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.9635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:在ICD-11出现之前,人格障碍的分类是基于分类原型的,具有悠久的历史。这些原型虽然很熟悉,但并不是基于人格科学。在非专业环境中,需要许多体征和症状知识的原型分类也很复杂。方法:本文介绍了人格障碍ICD-11的新结构,描述了不同的严重程度和特征域指示符。案例研究说明了分类的主要方面。结果:新的ICD-11系统承认人格及其干扰的基本维度性质,同时要求临床医生对人格障碍的存在或不存在及其严重程度(轻度、中度或重度)做出分类决定。正常人格功能和人格障碍之间的联系是通过确定五个特征域说明符来描述一个人的人格障碍模式(消极情感、脱离、分离、去抑制和无记忆症)来建立的,这些特征域说明符与更广泛的人格研究中建立的五大人格特征有关。结论:虽然新的评估措施已经并且正在开发中,但新系统的成功将依赖于临床医生和研究人员接受新系统来概念化和描述人格障碍,并在治疗结果的调查中利用分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personality Disorder Diagnoses in ICD-11: Transforming Conceptualisations and Practice.

Background: Until the advent of the ICD-11, classification of personality disorders was based on categorical prototypes with a long history. These prototypes, whilst familiar, were not based in the science of personality. Prototypical classifications were also complex to administer in non-specialist settings requiring knowledge of many signs and symptoms.

Method: This article introduces the new structure of ICD-11 for personality disorders, describing the different severity levels and trait domain specifiers. Case studies illustrate the main aspects of the classification.

Results: The new ICD-11 system acknowledges the fundamentally dimensional nature of personality and its disturbances whilst requiring clinicians to make categorical decisions on the presence or absence of personality disorder and severity (mild, moderate or severe). The connection between normal personality functioning and personality disorder is established by identifying five trait domain specifiers to describe the pattern of a person's personality disturbance (negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, and anankastia) that connect to the Big 5 personality traits established in the broader study of personality.

Conclusions: Whilst new assessment measures have been and are in development, the success of the new system will rely on clinicians and researchers embracing the new system to conceptualise and describe personality disturbances and to utilise the classification in the investigation of treatment outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信