首次评估商业多重PCR快速检测与急性关节感染相关的病原体。

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers, Rosanne de Boer, Lilli Gard, Greetje Anna Kampinga, Marleen van Oosten, Jan Maarten van Dijl, Paulus Christiaan Jutte, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
{"title":"首次评估商业多重PCR快速检测与急性关节感染相关的病原体。","authors":"Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers,&nbsp;Rosanne de Boer,&nbsp;Lilli Gard,&nbsp;Greetje Anna Kampinga,&nbsp;Marleen van Oosten,&nbsp;Jan Maarten van Dijl,&nbsp;Paulus Christiaan Jutte,&nbsp;Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker","doi":"10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. <b>Methods</b>: synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn></mrow> </math> months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. <b>Results</b>: a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn></mrow> </math> ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>14</mn></mrow> </math> ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>19</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusion</b>: the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, from the panel.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"8 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901515/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR panel for rapid detection of pathogens associated with acute joint infections.\",\"authors\":\"Jorrit Willem Adriaan Schoenmakers,&nbsp;Rosanne de Boer,&nbsp;Lilli Gard,&nbsp;Greetje Anna Kampinga,&nbsp;Marleen van Oosten,&nbsp;Jan Maarten van Dijl,&nbsp;Paulus Christiaan Jutte,&nbsp;Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. <b>Methods</b>: synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn></mrow> </math> months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. <b>Results</b>: a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn></mrow> </math> ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>14</mn></mrow> </math> ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( <math><mrow><mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>19</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusion</b>: the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, from the panel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:及时识别和鉴定天然关节和假关节急性脓毒性关节炎的致病微生物对提高治疗成功率至关重要。本研究的目的是独立评估多重BIOFIRE®关节感染(JI)面板(仅供研究使用)在滑液快速诊断中的诊断准确性。方法:在格罗宁根大学医学中心收集临床怀疑为先天性脓毒性关节炎、早期急性(手术后,关节置换术后3个月内)假体周围关节感染(PJI)或晚期急性(血液性,关节置换术后≥3个月)PJI患者的滑膜液样本。以肌肉骨骼感染学会标准和基于培养的方法作为参考标准,将JI面板结果与感染进行比较。结果:共分析45份样本。BIOFIRE JI Panel在所有患者类别中显示出高特异性(100 %,95 %置信区间(CI): 78-100)。对于临床怀疑为天然感染性关节炎的患者(n = 12),敏感性为83 %(95 % CI: 44-97),对于临床怀疑为晚期急性PJI的患者(n = 14),敏感性为73 %(95 % CI: 48-89),对于临床怀疑为早期急性PJI的患者(n = 19),敏感性为30 %(95 % CI: 11-60)。结论:本研究结果表明,BIOFIRE JI Panel对疑似原生脓毒性关节炎和晚期急性(血液性)PJI患者有明显的临床获益,但对早期急性(术后)PJI患者的临床获益较低,因为Panel中缺乏某些相关微生物,如表皮葡萄球菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR panel for rapid detection of pathogens associated with acute joint infections.

Background: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Methods: synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, 3 months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. Results: a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( n = 12 ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( n = 14 ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( n = 19 ). Conclusion: the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, from the panel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信