有能力受损的成年人的决策和为他们做的决策:荷兰水平的潜力

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
H.N. Stelma-Roorda (Rieneke) , V.I. Eichelsheim (Veroni)
{"title":"有能力受损的成年人的决策和为他们做的决策:荷兰水平的潜力","authors":"H.N. Stelma-Roorda (Rieneke) ,&nbsp;V.I. Eichelsheim (Veroni)","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anticipatory decision-making instruments – continuing powers of attorney and advance directives – are increasingly seen as a promising way forward to enhance the autonomy of adults with impaired capacity by making the adult's voice an influential component of future decisions. However, little is known about the experiences with these instruments in practice. This article presents the findings of an interview study looking at the expectations and experiences of both adults and attorneys with a Dutch anticipatory decision-making instrument, the so-called <em>levenstestament</em>. In order to realise its full potential, anticipatory decision-making instruments, such as the <em>levenstestament</em>, should be embedded in robust, timely and ongoing conversations between adults and attorneys about the adult's (changing) wishes and preferences and the role of the attorney.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making by and for adults with impaired capacity: The potential of the Dutch levenstestament\",\"authors\":\"H.N. Stelma-Roorda (Rieneke) ,&nbsp;V.I. Eichelsheim (Veroni)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anticipatory decision-making instruments – continuing powers of attorney and advance directives – are increasingly seen as a promising way forward to enhance the autonomy of adults with impaired capacity by making the adult's voice an influential component of future decisions. However, little is known about the experiences with these instruments in practice. This article presents the findings of an interview study looking at the expectations and experiences of both adults and attorneys with a Dutch anticipatory decision-making instrument, the so-called <em>levenstestament</em>. In order to realise its full potential, anticipatory decision-making instruments, such as the <em>levenstestament</em>, should be embedded in robust, timely and ongoing conversations between adults and attorneys about the adult's (changing) wishes and preferences and the role of the attorney.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272200070X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272200070X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预期性决策工具————持续授权书和预先指示————越来越被视为一种有希望的前进方式,通过使成年人的声音成为未来决定的有影响力的组成部分,加强能力受损成年人的自主权。然而,人们对这些工具在实践中的使用经验知之甚少。本文介绍了一项访谈研究的结果,该研究着眼于成年人和律师对荷兰预期决策工具的期望和经验,即所谓的水平遗嘱。为了充分发挥其潜力,应该在成年人和律师之间就成年人(不断变化的)愿望和偏好以及律师的作用进行的积极、及时和持续的对话中嵌入预期决策工具,例如平等陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-making by and for adults with impaired capacity: The potential of the Dutch levenstestament

Anticipatory decision-making instruments – continuing powers of attorney and advance directives – are increasingly seen as a promising way forward to enhance the autonomy of adults with impaired capacity by making the adult's voice an influential component of future decisions. However, little is known about the experiences with these instruments in practice. This article presents the findings of an interview study looking at the expectations and experiences of both adults and attorneys with a Dutch anticipatory decision-making instrument, the so-called levenstestament. In order to realise its full potential, anticipatory decision-making instruments, such as the levenstestament, should be embedded in robust, timely and ongoing conversations between adults and attorneys about the adult's (changing) wishes and preferences and the role of the attorney.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信