环境卫生在卫生诊所中的作用:两种不同浓度过氧单硫酸钾(KMPS)的效果评价。

Igiene e sanita pubblica Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Michele Totaro, Francesco Castellani, Francesca Di Serafino, Nunzio Zotti, Federica Badalucco, David Rocchi, Sara Civitelli, Giulia Geminale, Davide Masetti, Angelo Baggiani
{"title":"环境卫生在卫生诊所中的作用:两种不同浓度过氧单硫酸钾(KMPS)的效果评价。","authors":"Michele Totaro,&nbsp;Francesco Castellani,&nbsp;Francesca Di Serafino,&nbsp;Nunzio Zotti,&nbsp;Federica Badalucco,&nbsp;David Rocchi,&nbsp;Sara Civitelli,&nbsp;Giulia Geminale,&nbsp;Davide Masetti,&nbsp;Angelo Baggiani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are closely related to several factors, such as prolonged hospital stay in high-risk areas and intensive care units, potentially predisposing underlying conditions. It has also been demonstrated that HAI incidence may be related to non-respected standards of assistance, such as not adequately cleaned structures or medical devices contaminated by environmental bacteria and multidrug resistant enterobacteria.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this case it has been carried on an efficacy evaluation of a microionization system using potassium peroxymonosulfate (KMPS) for outpatient clinics indoor air disinfection.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two outpatient clinics (AMB-1 and AMB-2) were treated with KMPS (1% and 2% concentration), at the end of routinary clinic activities. Microbial sampling of air (settle plates) and surfaces (contact plates) were submitted before and after sanitizing, checking total microbial load at 37°C, possible opportunistic pathogens and moulds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sanitizing system at 1% concentration was efficient in mesophilic bacteria reduction (max 83%). Moreover, total abatement of Klebsiella pneumoniae in AMB1 and Acinetobacter lwoffi in AMB2 has been seen, both on surfaces. Regarding air samplings, 89% moulds reduction has been seen, as observed on surfaces. Scaling up concentration to 2%, mesophilic bacteria reduction was ≥ 94%, both in air and on surfaces of the outpatient clinics. Same results have also been seen on moulds, whose maximum reduction was 97%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Comparing results at different concentrations it has been observed that 2% KMPS induces an higher average reduction of mesophilic bacteria and moulds than 1%.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In this regard, microbial reduction percentage, either on surfaces or in the air, can be considered positive for outpatient clinics and healthcare settings indoor decontamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":73329,"journal":{"name":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","volume":"80 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of environmental sanitization in health clinics: evaluation of potassium peroxymonosulfate (KMPS) efficacy at two different concentrations.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Totaro,&nbsp;Francesco Castellani,&nbsp;Francesca Di Serafino,&nbsp;Nunzio Zotti,&nbsp;Federica Badalucco,&nbsp;David Rocchi,&nbsp;Sara Civitelli,&nbsp;Giulia Geminale,&nbsp;Davide Masetti,&nbsp;Angelo Baggiani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are closely related to several factors, such as prolonged hospital stay in high-risk areas and intensive care units, potentially predisposing underlying conditions. It has also been demonstrated that HAI incidence may be related to non-respected standards of assistance, such as not adequately cleaned structures or medical devices contaminated by environmental bacteria and multidrug resistant enterobacteria.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this case it has been carried on an efficacy evaluation of a microionization system using potassium peroxymonosulfate (KMPS) for outpatient clinics indoor air disinfection.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two outpatient clinics (AMB-1 and AMB-2) were treated with KMPS (1% and 2% concentration), at the end of routinary clinic activities. Microbial sampling of air (settle plates) and surfaces (contact plates) were submitted before and after sanitizing, checking total microbial load at 37°C, possible opportunistic pathogens and moulds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sanitizing system at 1% concentration was efficient in mesophilic bacteria reduction (max 83%). Moreover, total abatement of Klebsiella pneumoniae in AMB1 and Acinetobacter lwoffi in AMB2 has been seen, both on surfaces. Regarding air samplings, 89% moulds reduction has been seen, as observed on surfaces. Scaling up concentration to 2%, mesophilic bacteria reduction was ≥ 94%, both in air and on surfaces of the outpatient clinics. Same results have also been seen on moulds, whose maximum reduction was 97%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Comparing results at different concentrations it has been observed that 2% KMPS induces an higher average reduction of mesophilic bacteria and moulds than 1%.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In this regard, microbial reduction percentage, either on surfaces or in the air, can be considered positive for outpatient clinics and healthcare settings indoor decontamination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Igiene e sanita pubblica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Igiene e sanita pubblica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健相关感染(HAI)与几个因素密切相关,如在高危地区和重症监护病房的长期住院,可能会诱发潜在疾病。还证明,HAI的发病率可能与不遵守援助标准有关,例如未充分清洁的结构或被环境细菌和耐多药肠杆菌污染的医疗器械。目的:在本病例中,对使用过氧单硫酸钾(KMPS)的微离子系统进行门诊室内空气消毒的疗效评价。材料和方法:两个门诊(AMB-1和AMB-2)在常规临床活动结束时用KMPS(1%和2%浓度)治疗。消毒前后分别对空气(沉降板)和表面(接触板)进行微生物取样,在37°C条件下检查微生物总负荷、可能的条件致病菌和霉菌。结果:1%浓度的消毒系统对中温嗜菌的抑制效果最好(最大达83%)。此外,在AMB1中肺炎克雷伯菌和AMB2中伊沃菲不动杆菌在表面上的完全减少已经被观察到。关于空气取样,在表面上观察到,模具减少了89%。将浓度放大至2%,空气和门诊表面的嗜中温细菌减少率均≥94%。同样的结果也出现在模具上,其最大减少率为97%。讨论:比较不同浓度下的结果发现,2%的KMPS诱导中温细菌和霉菌的平均减量高于1%。背景:在这方面,微生物减少百分比,无论是在表面或空气中,可被认为是积极的门诊诊所和卫生保健机构室内净化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of environmental sanitization in health clinics: evaluation of potassium peroxymonosulfate (KMPS) efficacy at two different concentrations.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are closely related to several factors, such as prolonged hospital stay in high-risk areas and intensive care units, potentially predisposing underlying conditions. It has also been demonstrated that HAI incidence may be related to non-respected standards of assistance, such as not adequately cleaned structures or medical devices contaminated by environmental bacteria and multidrug resistant enterobacteria.

Objective: In this case it has been carried on an efficacy evaluation of a microionization system using potassium peroxymonosulfate (KMPS) for outpatient clinics indoor air disinfection.

Material and methods: Two outpatient clinics (AMB-1 and AMB-2) were treated with KMPS (1% and 2% concentration), at the end of routinary clinic activities. Microbial sampling of air (settle plates) and surfaces (contact plates) were submitted before and after sanitizing, checking total microbial load at 37°C, possible opportunistic pathogens and moulds.

Results: Sanitizing system at 1% concentration was efficient in mesophilic bacteria reduction (max 83%). Moreover, total abatement of Klebsiella pneumoniae in AMB1 and Acinetobacter lwoffi in AMB2 has been seen, both on surfaces. Regarding air samplings, 89% moulds reduction has been seen, as observed on surfaces. Scaling up concentration to 2%, mesophilic bacteria reduction was ≥ 94%, both in air and on surfaces of the outpatient clinics. Same results have also been seen on moulds, whose maximum reduction was 97%.

Discussion: Comparing results at different concentrations it has been observed that 2% KMPS induces an higher average reduction of mesophilic bacteria and moulds than 1%.

Background: In this regard, microbial reduction percentage, either on surfaces or in the air, can be considered positive for outpatient clinics and healthcare settings indoor decontamination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信