中度至重度多发性硬化症患者及其护理伙伴的双相体力活动干预的优先组成部分:一项改良的e-Delphi研究。

Q1 Nursing
International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-05 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2021-079
Afolasade Fakolade, Odessa McKenna, Rachel Kamel, Mark S Freedman, Marcia Finlayson, Amy E Latimer-Cheung, Lara A Pilutti
{"title":"中度至重度多发性硬化症患者及其护理伙伴的双相体力活动干预的优先组成部分:一项改良的e-Delphi研究。","authors":"Afolasade Fakolade,&nbsp;Odessa McKenna,&nbsp;Rachel Kamel,&nbsp;Mark S Freedman,&nbsp;Marcia Finlayson,&nbsp;Amy E Latimer-Cheung,&nbsp;Lara A Pilutti","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2021-079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their family care partners do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA) for health benefits. Dyadic PA interventions need to be developed to benefit each individual and the dyad. The objective of this study was to engage expert stakeholders in prioritizing and refining key intervention content, delivery methods, and the practical/logistical aspects of a dyadic PA intervention for persons with MS and their care partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two stakeholders (14 clinicians, 11 people with MS, 5 MS care partners, and 2 representatives of organizations that provide support services for people with MS and/or MS care partners) completed 2 rounds of a modified e-Delphi survey. In round 1, participants rated items across 3 domains: key intervention content (n = 8), delivery methods (n = 9), and practical/logistical aspects (n = 4). Participants contributed additional ideas about these domains, which were incorporated into round 2. Items that did not reach consensus in round 1 were forwarded to round 2 for rerating. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 24-item list of recommendations was generated, including ensuring that presentation of the intervention content encouraged lifestyle activities in addition to exercise, using videoconferencing rather than teleconferencing as a delivery platform, and stressing the importance of flexibility during the support calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback will be used to improve the quality of the intervention. The next step in this line of research involves evaluating the refined intervention in a pilot feasibility trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"25 1","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881421/pdf/i1537-2073-25-1-8.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing Components of a Dyadic Physical Activity Intervention for People With Moderate to Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Care Partners: A Modified e-Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Afolasade Fakolade,&nbsp;Odessa McKenna,&nbsp;Rachel Kamel,&nbsp;Mark S Freedman,&nbsp;Marcia Finlayson,&nbsp;Amy E Latimer-Cheung,&nbsp;Lara A Pilutti\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2021-079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their family care partners do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA) for health benefits. Dyadic PA interventions need to be developed to benefit each individual and the dyad. The objective of this study was to engage expert stakeholders in prioritizing and refining key intervention content, delivery methods, and the practical/logistical aspects of a dyadic PA intervention for persons with MS and their care partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two stakeholders (14 clinicians, 11 people with MS, 5 MS care partners, and 2 representatives of organizations that provide support services for people with MS and/or MS care partners) completed 2 rounds of a modified e-Delphi survey. In round 1, participants rated items across 3 domains: key intervention content (n = 8), delivery methods (n = 9), and practical/logistical aspects (n = 4). Participants contributed additional ideas about these domains, which were incorporated into round 2. Items that did not reach consensus in round 1 were forwarded to round 2 for rerating. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 24-item list of recommendations was generated, including ensuring that presentation of the intervention content encouraged lifestyle activities in addition to exercise, using videoconferencing rather than teleconferencing as a delivery platform, and stressing the importance of flexibility during the support calls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feedback will be used to improve the quality of the intervention. The next step in this line of research involves evaluating the refined intervention in a pilot feasibility trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"8-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9881421/pdf/i1537-2073-25-1-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2021-079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2021-079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:患有中度至重度多发性硬化症(MS)的人及其家庭护理伙伴没有进行足够的体育活动(PA)来促进健康。需要制定Dyadic PA干预措施,以使每个人和二人组受益。本研究的目的是让专家利益相关者参与对MS患者及其护理伙伴的二元PA干预的关键干预内容、实施方法和实践/后勤方面进行优先排序和完善。方法:32名利益相关者(14名临床医生、11名MS患者、5名MS护理合作伙伴以及2名为MS患者和/或MS护理伙伴提供支持服务的组织代表)完成了两轮修改的e-Delphi调查。在第一轮中,参与者对3个领域的项目进行了评分:关键干预内容(n=8)、交付方法(n=9)和实践/后勤方面(n=4)。与会者提出了关于这些领域的其他想法,这些想法已纳入第二轮讨论。在第一轮中没有达成共识的项目被转交给第二轮重新评级。使用描述性统计和内容分析对数据进行分析。结果:产生了一份24项建议清单,包括确保干预内容的介绍鼓励除锻炼外的生活方式活动,使用视频会议而不是电话会议作为交付平台,并强调在支持电话会议期间灵活性的重要性。结论:反馈将用于提高干预的质量。这一研究领域的下一步涉及在试点可行性试验中评估精细干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing Components of a Dyadic Physical Activity Intervention for People With Moderate to Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Care Partners: A Modified e-Delphi Study.

Background: People with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their family care partners do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA) for health benefits. Dyadic PA interventions need to be developed to benefit each individual and the dyad. The objective of this study was to engage expert stakeholders in prioritizing and refining key intervention content, delivery methods, and the practical/logistical aspects of a dyadic PA intervention for persons with MS and their care partners.

Methods: Thirty-two stakeholders (14 clinicians, 11 people with MS, 5 MS care partners, and 2 representatives of organizations that provide support services for people with MS and/or MS care partners) completed 2 rounds of a modified e-Delphi survey. In round 1, participants rated items across 3 domains: key intervention content (n = 8), delivery methods (n = 9), and practical/logistical aspects (n = 4). Participants contributed additional ideas about these domains, which were incorporated into round 2. Items that did not reach consensus in round 1 were forwarded to round 2 for rerating. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

Results: A 24-item list of recommendations was generated, including ensuring that presentation of the intervention content encouraged lifestyle activities in addition to exercise, using videoconferencing rather than teleconferencing as a delivery platform, and stressing the importance of flexibility during the support calls.

Conclusions: Feedback will be used to improve the quality of the intervention. The next step in this line of research involves evaluating the refined intervention in a pilot feasibility trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信