口服格列本脲与皮下注射胰岛素对妊娠糖尿病患者围产期结局的影响:随机临床试验。

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetric Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1177/1753495X221100167
Azam Faraji, Lida Tahamtani, Najmeh Maharlouei, Nasrin Asadi
{"title":"口服格列本脲与皮下注射胰岛素对妊娠糖尿病患者围产期结局的影响:随机临床试验。","authors":"Azam Faraji, Lida Tahamtani, Najmeh Maharlouei, Nasrin Asadi","doi":"10.1177/1753495X221100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first-line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus remains insulin, but oral hypoglycemic agents are easier and cheaper to use. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glibenclamide and subcutaneous insulin on the serum glucose control and perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted during a 2-year period from 2017 to 2019 in two tertiary healthcare centers in Shiraz, Iran. We included 84 singleton pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to oral glibenclamide (<i>n</i> = 44) or subcutaneous insulin (<i>n</i> = 40) according to a standard protocol and followed until delivery. The primary endpoint was to compare the glycemic level of patients, and the secondary outcomes included pregnancy adverse events and neonatal complications such as preeclampsia, preterm and premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, placental abruption, maternal hypoglycemia, birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After treatment, the two study groups were comparable regarding fasting blood glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.398) and 2 h postprandial glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.085). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the rate of preeclampsia (<i>p</i> = 0.250), preterm rupture of membranes (<i>p</i> = 0.998), preterm labor (<i>p</i> = 0.495), hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.476), and abruption (<i>p</i> = 0.815). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in birth weight (<i>p</i> = 0.863) and the Apgar score at 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.190) and 5 min (<i>p</i> = 0.055). The rates of neonatal adverse events including hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.999), hyperbilirubinemia (<i>p</i> = 0.160), neonatal intensive care unit admission (<i>p</i> = 0.852), and respiratory distress syndrome (<i>p</i> = 0.665) were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current study demonstrate that oral glibenclamide is as effective and safe as subcutaneous insulin in glycemic control and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Thus, it could be used as first-line treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":51717,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of oral glibenclamide versus subcutaneous insulin on perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Azam Faraji, Lida Tahamtani, Najmeh Maharlouei, Nasrin Asadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753495X221100167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first-line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus remains insulin, but oral hypoglycemic agents are easier and cheaper to use. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glibenclamide and subcutaneous insulin on the serum glucose control and perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted during a 2-year period from 2017 to 2019 in two tertiary healthcare centers in Shiraz, Iran. We included 84 singleton pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to oral glibenclamide (<i>n</i> = 44) or subcutaneous insulin (<i>n</i> = 40) according to a standard protocol and followed until delivery. The primary endpoint was to compare the glycemic level of patients, and the secondary outcomes included pregnancy adverse events and neonatal complications such as preeclampsia, preterm and premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, placental abruption, maternal hypoglycemia, birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After treatment, the two study groups were comparable regarding fasting blood glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.398) and 2 h postprandial glucose (<i>p</i> = 0.085). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the rate of preeclampsia (<i>p</i> = 0.250), preterm rupture of membranes (<i>p</i> = 0.998), preterm labor (<i>p</i> = 0.495), hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.476), and abruption (<i>p</i> = 0.815). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in birth weight (<i>p</i> = 0.863) and the Apgar score at 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.190) and 5 min (<i>p</i> = 0.055). The rates of neonatal adverse events including hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.999), hyperbilirubinemia (<i>p</i> = 0.160), neonatal intensive care unit admission (<i>p</i> = 0.852), and respiratory distress syndrome (<i>p</i> = 0.665) were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current study demonstrate that oral glibenclamide is as effective and safe as subcutaneous insulin in glycemic control and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Thus, it could be used as first-line treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X221100167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X221100167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠期糖尿病的一线治疗仍然是胰岛素,但口服降糖药更容易使用且成本更低。本研究旨在比较口服格列本脲和皮下注射胰岛素对妊娠期糖尿病患者血清葡萄糖控制和围产期结局的有效性和安全性:这项随机临床试验于2017年至2019年在伊朗设拉子市的两家三级医疗保健中心进行,为期2年。我们纳入了 84 名妊娠 24 周至 34 周、确诊为妊娠糖尿病的单胎妊娠患者。根据标准方案,患者被随机分配到口服格列本脲(44 例)或皮下注射胰岛素(40 例),并随访至分娩。主要终点是比较患者的血糖水平,次要结果包括妊娠不良事件和新生儿并发症,如子痫前期、早产和胎膜早破、早产、胎盘早剥、产妇低血糖、出生体重、新生儿低血糖、高胆红素血症、呼吸窘迫综合征和新生儿重症监护室入院:两个研究组的基线特征相当。治疗后,两组的空腹血糖(p = 0.398)和餐后 2 小时血糖(p = 0.085)具有可比性。两组在子痫前期(p = 0.250)、胎膜早破(p = 0.998)、早产(p = 0.495)、低血糖(p = 0.476)和胎盘早剥(p = 0.815)的发生率方面无明显差异。两个研究组的出生体重(p = 0.863)和 1 分钟(p = 0.190)和 5 分钟(p = 0.055)Apgar 评分无明显差异。两组的新生儿不良事件发生率相当,包括低血糖(p = 0.999)、高胆红素血症(p = 0.160)、新生儿重症监护室入院(p = 0.852)和呼吸窘迫综合征(p = 0.665):本研究结果表明,口服格列本脲与皮下注射胰岛素在妊娠期糖尿病妇女的血糖控制、孕产妇和新生儿预后方面同样有效和安全。因此,格列本脲可作为妊娠糖尿病的一线治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of oral glibenclamide versus subcutaneous insulin on perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: The first-line treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus remains insulin, but oral hypoglycemic agents are easier and cheaper to use. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glibenclamide and subcutaneous insulin on the serum glucose control and perinatal outcome of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted during a 2-year period from 2017 to 2019 in two tertiary healthcare centers in Shiraz, Iran. We included 84 singleton pregnancies between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned to oral glibenclamide (n = 44) or subcutaneous insulin (n = 40) according to a standard protocol and followed until delivery. The primary endpoint was to compare the glycemic level of patients, and the secondary outcomes included pregnancy adverse events and neonatal complications such as preeclampsia, preterm and premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, placental abruption, maternal hypoglycemia, birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Results: The two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After treatment, the two study groups were comparable regarding fasting blood glucose (p = 0.398) and 2 h postprandial glucose (p = 0.085). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the rate of preeclampsia (p = 0.250), preterm rupture of membranes (p = 0.998), preterm labor (p = 0.495), hypoglycemia (p = 0.476), and abruption (p = 0.815). There was no significant difference between the two study groups in birth weight (p = 0.863) and the Apgar score at 1 (p = 0.190) and 5 min (p = 0.055). The rates of neonatal adverse events including hypoglycemia (p = 0.999), hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.160), neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 0.852), and respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.665) were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: The results of the current study demonstrate that oral glibenclamide is as effective and safe as subcutaneous insulin in glycemic control and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Thus, it could be used as first-line treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetric Medicine
Obstetric Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信