在髂静脉放置镍钛诺支架与长时间的背部疼痛无关。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Chloe Snow, Sydney Pappas, Levan Sulakvelidze, Richard Kennedy, Sanjiv Lakhanpal, Peter J Pappas
{"title":"在髂静脉放置镍钛诺支架与长时间的背部疼痛无关。","authors":"Chloe Snow,&nbsp;Sydney Pappas,&nbsp;Levan Sulakvelidze,&nbsp;Richard Kennedy,&nbsp;Sanjiv Lakhanpal,&nbsp;Peter J Pappas","doi":"10.1177/02683555221142710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular stenting is the standard of care for the management of symptomatic chronic venous obstruction. The increased radial resistive force and longer lengths of Nitinol stents have led to questions over persistent post-operative back pain. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the incidence and severity of post-operative back pain of Nitinol stents compared to Wallstents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of data at the Center for Vascular Medicine was performed. Patient demographics, pre-operative, one week, three-, six,- and 12 month visual analog pain scores (VAS) for back pain, stent type, diameter, length, and vein locations were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 2014 to November 2021, 627 (412 women/215 men) patients were assessed for the presence of post-operative back pain after an initial iliac vein stent placement. Stents utilized were Wallstents (<i>n</i> = 114), Venovo (<i>n</i> = 342), and Abre (<i>n</i> = 171). The most common Nitinol stent diameter and lengths were 14 mm, 16 mm, and 120 mm, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ .03). The incidence of back pain at one week was 66% (411/627). VAS scores at one week and one, three, and six months post-operatively were the following: Wallstents-2.6 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 66), 1.7 ± 2.6 (<i>n</i> = 43) 0.7 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 51), and 0 ± 0 (<i>n</i> = 27); Abre-3.5 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 130), 3.8 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 19), 1.2 ± 2.5 (<i>n</i> = 12), and 1 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 5); and Venovo- 2.5 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 216), 2.4 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 70), 0.9 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 68), and 0.6 ± 1.7 (<i>n</i> = 49). There was no difference in the severity of back pain at any time point (<i>p</i> ≥ .99). The development of back pain was unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative back pain was observed in 66% of patients at one week. The average pain score at one week for the entire cohort was three, which declined to less than one at one month. No difference in the severity of back pain between groups was observed at any time point, and the development of back pain is unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20139,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":"38 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitinol stents placed in iliac veins are not associated with prolonged back pain.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Snow,&nbsp;Sydney Pappas,&nbsp;Levan Sulakvelidze,&nbsp;Richard Kennedy,&nbsp;Sanjiv Lakhanpal,&nbsp;Peter J Pappas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555221142710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular stenting is the standard of care for the management of symptomatic chronic venous obstruction. The increased radial resistive force and longer lengths of Nitinol stents have led to questions over persistent post-operative back pain. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the incidence and severity of post-operative back pain of Nitinol stents compared to Wallstents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of data at the Center for Vascular Medicine was performed. Patient demographics, pre-operative, one week, three-, six,- and 12 month visual analog pain scores (VAS) for back pain, stent type, diameter, length, and vein locations were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 2014 to November 2021, 627 (412 women/215 men) patients were assessed for the presence of post-operative back pain after an initial iliac vein stent placement. Stents utilized were Wallstents (<i>n</i> = 114), Venovo (<i>n</i> = 342), and Abre (<i>n</i> = 171). The most common Nitinol stent diameter and lengths were 14 mm, 16 mm, and 120 mm, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ .03). The incidence of back pain at one week was 66% (411/627). VAS scores at one week and one, three, and six months post-operatively were the following: Wallstents-2.6 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 66), 1.7 ± 2.6 (<i>n</i> = 43) 0.7 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 51), and 0 ± 0 (<i>n</i> = 27); Abre-3.5 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 130), 3.8 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 19), 1.2 ± 2.5 (<i>n</i> = 12), and 1 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 5); and Venovo- 2.5 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 216), 2.4 ± 3 (<i>n</i> = 70), 0.9 ± 2 (<i>n</i> = 68), and 0.6 ± 1.7 (<i>n</i> = 49). There was no difference in the severity of back pain at any time point (<i>p</i> ≥ .99). The development of back pain was unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative back pain was observed in 66% of patients at one week. The average pain score at one week for the entire cohort was three, which declined to less than one at one month. No difference in the severity of back pain between groups was observed at any time point, and the development of back pain is unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555221142710\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555221142710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

血管内支架植入术是治疗症状性慢性静脉阻塞的标准治疗方法。径向阻力的增加和镍钛诺支架的长度变长导致了术后持续背痛的问题。本研究的目的是评估镍钛诺支架与Wallstents相比术后背部疼痛的发生率和严重程度。方法:对血管医学中心的资料进行回顾性分析。评估患者人口统计学、术前、1周、3个月、6个月和12个月的背痛视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、支架类型、直径、长度和静脉位置。结果:2014年4月至2021年11月,627例患者(412名女性/215名男性)在首次髂静脉支架置入后出现术后背痛。使用的支架有Wallstents(114例)、Venovo(342例)和Abre(171例)。最常见的镍钛诺支架直径为14 mm,支架长度为16 mm,支架长度为120 mm (p≤0.03)。一周后背部疼痛发生率为66%(411/627)。术后1周、1、3、6个月的VAS评分分别为:Wallstents-2.6±3 (n = 66)、1.7±2.6 (n = 43)、0.7±2 (n = 51)、0±0 (n = 27);abre - 3.5±3 (n = 130), 3.8±3 (n = 19), 1.2±2.5 (n = 12),和1±2 (n = 5);Venovo分别为2.5±3 (n = 216)、2.4±3 (n = 70)、0.9±2 (n = 68)和0.6±1.7 (n = 49)。在任何时间点,背痛的严重程度没有差异(p≥0.99)。背部疼痛的发生与支架类型、直径、长度或覆盖的静脉范围无关。结论:66%的患者术后一周出现背痛。整个队列一周的平均疼痛评分为3分,一个月后下降到1分以下。各组间背痛的严重程度在任何时间点均无差异,背痛的发展与支架类型、直径、长度或覆盖静脉范围无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nitinol stents placed in iliac veins are not associated with prolonged back pain.

Introduction: Endovascular stenting is the standard of care for the management of symptomatic chronic venous obstruction. The increased radial resistive force and longer lengths of Nitinol stents have led to questions over persistent post-operative back pain. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the incidence and severity of post-operative back pain of Nitinol stents compared to Wallstents.

Methods: A retrospective review of data at the Center for Vascular Medicine was performed. Patient demographics, pre-operative, one week, three-, six,- and 12 month visual analog pain scores (VAS) for back pain, stent type, diameter, length, and vein locations were assessed.

Results: From April 2014 to November 2021, 627 (412 women/215 men) patients were assessed for the presence of post-operative back pain after an initial iliac vein stent placement. Stents utilized were Wallstents (n = 114), Venovo (n = 342), and Abre (n = 171). The most common Nitinol stent diameter and lengths were 14 mm, 16 mm, and 120 mm, respectively (p ≤ .03). The incidence of back pain at one week was 66% (411/627). VAS scores at one week and one, three, and six months post-operatively were the following: Wallstents-2.6 ± 3 (n = 66), 1.7 ± 2.6 (n = 43) 0.7 ± 2 (n = 51), and 0 ± 0 (n = 27); Abre-3.5 ± 3 (n = 130), 3.8 ± 3 (n = 19), 1.2 ± 2.5 (n = 12), and 1 ± 2 (n = 5); and Venovo- 2.5 ± 3 (n = 216), 2.4 ± 3 (n = 70), 0.9 ± 2 (n = 68), and 0.6 ± 1.7 (n = 49). There was no difference in the severity of back pain at any time point (p ≥ .99). The development of back pain was unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.

Conclusions: Post-operative back pain was observed in 66% of patients at one week. The average pain score at one week for the entire cohort was three, which declined to less than one at one month. No difference in the severity of back pain between groups was observed at any time point, and the development of back pain is unrelated to stent type, diameter, length, or covered vein territory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phlebology
Phlebology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading scientific journal devoted entirely to venous disease, Phlebology is the official journal of several international societies devoted to the subject. It publishes the results of high quality studies and reviews on any factor that may influence the outcome of patients with venous disease. This journal provides authoritative information about all aspects of diseases of the veins including up to the minute reviews, original articles, and short reports on the latest treatment procedures and patient outcomes to help medical practitioners, allied health professionals and scientists stay up-to-date on developments. Print ISSN: 0268-3555
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信