{"title":"轻度严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型患者唾液和鼻咽拭子及RT-PCR检测结果的比较研究","authors":"Satvinder Singh Bakshi , V. Mangayarkarasi , Debabrata Dash , Soumyajit Das , Seepana Ramesh , Cheeranjeevi Jayam , Vinoth Kumar Kalidoss","doi":"10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93855,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"74 5","pages":"Pages 315-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study on Saliva and Nasopharyngeal swabs and the outcome of RT-PCR test in patients with mild symptoms of SARS-CoV-2\",\"authors\":\"Satvinder Singh Bakshi , V. Mangayarkarasi , Debabrata Dash , Soumyajit Das , Seepana Ramesh , Cheeranjeevi Jayam , Vinoth Kumar Kalidoss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\"74 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 315-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173573523000339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173573523000339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study on Saliva and Nasopharyngeal swabs and the outcome of RT-PCR test in patients with mild symptoms of SARS-CoV-2
Aim
A simple and reliable method for diagnosing COVID 19 infections is the needed. The role of saliva in the transmission of the infection has already been established.
Method
Saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients suspected to have COVID 19 infections were taken simultaneously, and the results of the RT-PCR were compared.
Result
Total 405 samples were collected, of which 250 males and 155 females. In the 391 samples included for analysis, 370 (94.63%) samples were found to have concordance results, and 21 (5.37%) samples had discordant results.
Conclusion
The use of saliva to diagnose COVID 19 infection is reliable, and its use can be recommended.