射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的基线心率和血压与事件发生时间之间的关系:来自 QUALIFY 国际登记处的数据

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Amr Abdin, Stefan D. Anker, Martin R. Cowie, Gerasimos S. Filippatos, Piotr Ponikowski, Luigi Tavazzi, Jakob Schöpe, Stefan Wagenpfeil, Michel Komajda, Michael Böhm
{"title":"射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的基线心率和血压与事件发生时间之间的关系:来自 QUALIFY 国际登记处的数据","authors":"Amr Abdin,&nbsp;Stefan D. Anker,&nbsp;Martin R. Cowie,&nbsp;Gerasimos S. Filippatos,&nbsp;Piotr Ponikowski,&nbsp;Luigi Tavazzi,&nbsp;Jakob Schöpe,&nbsp;Stefan Wagenpfeil,&nbsp;Michel Komajda,&nbsp;Michael Böhm","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>A high resting heart rate (RHR) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) are a risk factor and a risk indicator, respectively, for poor heart failure (HF) outcomes. This analysis evaluated the associations between baseline RHR and SBP with outcomes and treatment patterns in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the QUALIFY (QUality of Adherence to guideline recommendations for LIFe-saving treatment in heart failure surveY) international registry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>Between September 2013 and December 2014, 7317 HFrEF patients with a previous HF hospitalization within 1–15 months were enrolled in the QUALIFY registry. Complete follow-up data were available for 5138 patients. The relationships between RHR and SBP and outcomes were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model and were analysed according to baseline values as high RHR (H-RHR) ≥75 bpm versus low RHR (L-RHR) &lt;75 bpm and high SBP (H-SBP) ≥110 mmHg versus low SBP (L-SBP) &lt;110 mmHg and analysed according to each of the following four phenotypes: H-RHR/L-SBP, L-RHR/L-SBP, H-RHR/H-SBP and L-RHR/H-SBP (reference group). Compared to the reference group, H-RHR/L-SBP was associated with the worst outcomes for the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–2.21, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), cardiovascular death (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.69–4.33, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and HF hospitalization (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30–2.01, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Low-risk patients with L-RHR/H-SBP achieved more frequently ≥50% of target doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and beta-blockers (BBs) than the other groups. However, 48% and 46% of low-risk patients were not well treated with ACEIs and BBs, respectively (≤50% of target dose or no treatment).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with HFrEF and recent hospitalization, elevated RHR and lower SBP identify patients at increased risk for cardiovascular endpoints. While SBP and RHR are often recognized as barriers that deter physicians from treating with high doses of recommended drugs, they are not the only reason leaving many patients suboptimally treated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"25 11","pages":"1985-1993"},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.3023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between baseline heart rate and blood pressure and time to events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: Data from the QUALIFY international registry\",\"authors\":\"Amr Abdin,&nbsp;Stefan D. Anker,&nbsp;Martin R. Cowie,&nbsp;Gerasimos S. Filippatos,&nbsp;Piotr Ponikowski,&nbsp;Luigi Tavazzi,&nbsp;Jakob Schöpe,&nbsp;Stefan Wagenpfeil,&nbsp;Michel Komajda,&nbsp;Michael Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>A high resting heart rate (RHR) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) are a risk factor and a risk indicator, respectively, for poor heart failure (HF) outcomes. This analysis evaluated the associations between baseline RHR and SBP with outcomes and treatment patterns in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the QUALIFY (QUality of Adherence to guideline recommendations for LIFe-saving treatment in heart failure surveY) international registry.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between September 2013 and December 2014, 7317 HFrEF patients with a previous HF hospitalization within 1–15 months were enrolled in the QUALIFY registry. Complete follow-up data were available for 5138 patients. The relationships between RHR and SBP and outcomes were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model and were analysed according to baseline values as high RHR (H-RHR) ≥75 bpm versus low RHR (L-RHR) &lt;75 bpm and high SBP (H-SBP) ≥110 mmHg versus low SBP (L-SBP) &lt;110 mmHg and analysed according to each of the following four phenotypes: H-RHR/L-SBP, L-RHR/L-SBP, H-RHR/H-SBP and L-RHR/H-SBP (reference group). Compared to the reference group, H-RHR/L-SBP was associated with the worst outcomes for the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–2.21, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), cardiovascular death (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.69–4.33, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and HF hospitalization (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30–2.01, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Low-risk patients with L-RHR/H-SBP achieved more frequently ≥50% of target doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and beta-blockers (BBs) than the other groups. However, 48% and 46% of low-risk patients were not well treated with ACEIs and BBs, respectively (≤50% of target dose or no treatment).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients with HFrEF and recent hospitalization, elevated RHR and lower SBP identify patients at increased risk for cardiovascular endpoints. While SBP and RHR are often recognized as barriers that deter physicians from treating with high doses of recommended drugs, they are not the only reason leaving many patients suboptimally treated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"1985-1993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.3023\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

高静息心率(RHR)和低收缩压(SBP)分别是不良心力衰竭(HF)结局的危险因素和危险指标。该分析评估了基线RHR和收缩压与心衰和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的结局和治疗模式之间的关系(符合心力衰竭救生治疗指南建议的质量调查)国际注册。方法和结果2013年9月至2014年12月,7317例既往HF住院1-15个月的HFrEF患者入组了qualiberegistry。5138例患者获得了完整的随访数据。使用Cox比例风险模型评估RHR和收缩压与预后之间的关系,并根据基线值(高RHR (H-RHR)≥75 bpm vs低RHR (L-RHR) <75 bpm)和高收缩压(H-SBP)≥110 mmHg vs低收缩压(L-SBP) <110 mmHg)进行分析,并根据以下四种表型进行分析:H-RHR/L-SBP, L-RHR/L-SBP, H-RHR/H-SBP和L-RHR/H-SBP(对照组)。与对照组相比,H-RHR/L-SBP与心血管死亡和心衰住院(危险比[HR] 1.83, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.51-2.21, p < 0.001)、心血管死亡(危险比[HR] 2.70, 95% CI 1.69-4.33, p < 0.001)和心衰住院(危险比[HR] 1.62, 95% CI 1.30-2.01, p < 0.001)的最差结局相关。低风险的L-RHR/H-SBP患者比其他组更频繁地达到≥50%的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和β受体阻滞剂(BBs)的目标剂量。然而,分别有48%和46%的低危患者未得到acei和BBs的良好治疗(≤目标剂量的50%或未治疗)。结论:在HFrEF和近期住院的患者中,RHR升高和收缩压降低可识别心血管终点风险增加的患者。虽然收缩压和RHR通常被认为是阻止医生使用高剂量推荐药物治疗的障碍,但它们并不是导致许多患者治疗效果不佳的唯一原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations between baseline heart rate and blood pressure and time to events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: Data from the QUALIFY international registry

Associations between baseline heart rate and blood pressure and time to events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: Data from the QUALIFY international registry

Aims

A high resting heart rate (RHR) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) are a risk factor and a risk indicator, respectively, for poor heart failure (HF) outcomes. This analysis evaluated the associations between baseline RHR and SBP with outcomes and treatment patterns in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the QUALIFY (QUality of Adherence to guideline recommendations for LIFe-saving treatment in heart failure surveY) international registry.

Methods and results

Between September 2013 and December 2014, 7317 HFrEF patients with a previous HF hospitalization within 1–15 months were enrolled in the QUALIFY registry. Complete follow-up data were available for 5138 patients. The relationships between RHR and SBP and outcomes were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model and were analysed according to baseline values as high RHR (H-RHR) ≥75 bpm versus low RHR (L-RHR) <75 bpm and high SBP (H-SBP) ≥110 mmHg versus low SBP (L-SBP) <110 mmHg and analysed according to each of the following four phenotypes: H-RHR/L-SBP, L-RHR/L-SBP, H-RHR/H-SBP and L-RHR/H-SBP (reference group). Compared to the reference group, H-RHR/L-SBP was associated with the worst outcomes for the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–2.21, p < 0.001), cardiovascular death (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.69–4.33, p < 0.001), and HF hospitalization (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30–2.01, p < 0.001). Low-risk patients with L-RHR/H-SBP achieved more frequently ≥50% of target doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and beta-blockers (BBs) than the other groups. However, 48% and 46% of low-risk patients were not well treated with ACEIs and BBs, respectively (≤50% of target dose or no treatment).

Conclusion

In patients with HFrEF and recent hospitalization, elevated RHR and lower SBP identify patients at increased risk for cardiovascular endpoints. While SBP and RHR are often recognized as barriers that deter physicians from treating with high doses of recommended drugs, they are not the only reason leaving many patients suboptimally treated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信