椎体增强术治疗疼痛性4型骨质疏松压缩性骨折的比较研究。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohamed Abdelrahman Abdalla, Ricardo Rodrigues, Christian Ulbricht
{"title":"椎体增强术治疗疼痛性4型骨质疏松压缩性骨折的比较研究。","authors":"Mohamed Abdelrahman Abdalla,&nbsp;Ricardo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Christian Ulbricht","doi":"10.1155/2023/1562892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 4 osteoporotic fracture (OF4), according to the classification system of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU), is unstable and requires fixation as per the guidelines of the same group. We evaluated the use of stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (VBA) in pain control of OF4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, in two hospitals, comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (KP) in pain control of OF4. OF4 patients treated with VBA were compared to a conservatively treated control group. The two groups of OF4 were then compared to similar cohort of OF2 and OF3 patients who were treated by either VBA or expectantly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 cases were studied. VBA of OF4 showed a statistically significant better pain control than conservative treatment. The response of this group of fractures to VBA was similar to that of OF2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VBA can provide satisfactory pain control for OF4 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1562892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870678/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertebral Augmentation for Painful Type 4 Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelrahman Abdalla,&nbsp;Ricardo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Christian Ulbricht\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/1562892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 4 osteoporotic fracture (OF4), according to the classification system of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU), is unstable and requires fixation as per the guidelines of the same group. We evaluated the use of stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (VBA) in pain control of OF4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, in two hospitals, comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (KP) in pain control of OF4. OF4 patients treated with VBA were compared to a conservatively treated control group. The two groups of OF4 were then compared to similar cohort of OF2 and OF3 patients who were treated by either VBA or expectantly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 cases were studied. VBA of OF4 showed a statistically significant better pain control than conservative treatment. The response of this group of fractures to VBA was similar to that of OF2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VBA can provide satisfactory pain control for OF4 patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"1562892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1562892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1562892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:根据德国骨科与创伤学会(DGOU)脊柱分会的分类系统,4型骨质疏松性骨折(OF4)是不稳定的,需要按照同组指南进行固定。我们评估了独立椎体增强术(VBA)在OF4疼痛控制中的应用。方法:这是一项在两家医院进行的单中心比较研究,以评估经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和后凸成形术(KP)在控制OF4疼痛方面的有效性。用VBA治疗的OF4患者与保守治疗的对照组进行比较。然后将两组OF4患者与接受VBA或预期治疗的OF2和OF3患者进行比较。结果:共研究78例。与保守治疗相比,OF4的VBA治疗对疼痛的控制有统计学意义。该组骨折对VBA的反应与OF2和of3相似。结论:VBA能较好地控制OF4患者的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vertebral Augmentation for Painful Type 4 Osteoporotic Compression Fractures: A Comparative Study.

Background: Type 4 osteoporotic fracture (OF4), according to the classification system of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU), is unstable and requires fixation as per the guidelines of the same group. We evaluated the use of stand-alone vertebral body augmentation (VBA) in pain control of OF4.

Methods: This is a single-centre, in two hospitals, comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty (KP) in pain control of OF4. OF4 patients treated with VBA were compared to a conservatively treated control group. The two groups of OF4 were then compared to similar cohort of OF2 and OF3 patients who were treated by either VBA or expectantly.

Results: A total of 78 cases were studied. VBA of OF4 showed a statistically significant better pain control than conservative treatment. The response of this group of fractures to VBA was similar to that of OF2 and 3.

Conclusion: VBA can provide satisfactory pain control for OF4 patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信