{"title":"实验小鼠处理和抑制装置的改进。","authors":"Moshe Aftalion, David Gur, Noach Shalom, Yinon Levy, Avital Tidhar, Yaron Vagima, Ayelet Zauberman, Tseela David, Amir Rosner, Shay Weiss, Emanuelle Mamroud","doi":"10.1177/1535676019892068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most animal handling procedures are associated with injuries among veterinary staff and laboratory animal researchers. However, much of the currently available animal handling equipment is inadequate, limiting access to the treated animal or making workflow cumbersome. Moreover, restraining animals to perform procedures, such as blood collection or injection, elicits stress in both the animal and the worker. Herein, we present 4 home-built restraint and blood collection devices in extensive use in our institute.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Animal laboratory workers and experienced veterinarians regularly using the devices (n = 14) were asked to complete a survey ranking the contribution of the devices to worker safety and procedural efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overwhelming majority of responders (≥75%) associated all 4 devices with substantial improvements in worker safety and procedural efficiency. There were no reports of impaired workflow or safety when using the devices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Infection and exposure control may be implemented on various levels, including use of safer procedures, such as injection and blood collection devices. The presented intuitive handling and restraint devices allow the animal worker/researcher to perform various procedures safely and efficiently while eliciting less animal and worker stress. The devices can be easily adjusted to accommodate animal size and disease status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current devices will serve as prototypes for design of devices for larger laboratory animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"25 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019892068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Improved Devices for Handling and Restraining Experimental Laboratory Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Moshe Aftalion, David Gur, Noach Shalom, Yinon Levy, Avital Tidhar, Yaron Vagima, Ayelet Zauberman, Tseela David, Amir Rosner, Shay Weiss, Emanuelle Mamroud\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1535676019892068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most animal handling procedures are associated with injuries among veterinary staff and laboratory animal researchers. However, much of the currently available animal handling equipment is inadequate, limiting access to the treated animal or making workflow cumbersome. Moreover, restraining animals to perform procedures, such as blood collection or injection, elicits stress in both the animal and the worker. Herein, we present 4 home-built restraint and blood collection devices in extensive use in our institute.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Animal laboratory workers and experienced veterinarians regularly using the devices (n = 14) were asked to complete a survey ranking the contribution of the devices to worker safety and procedural efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overwhelming majority of responders (≥75%) associated all 4 devices with substantial improvements in worker safety and procedural efficiency. There were no reports of impaired workflow or safety when using the devices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Infection and exposure control may be implemented on various levels, including use of safer procedures, such as injection and blood collection devices. The presented intuitive handling and restraint devices allow the animal worker/researcher to perform various procedures safely and efficiently while eliciting less animal and worker stress. The devices can be easily adjusted to accommodate animal size and disease status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current devices will serve as prototypes for design of devices for larger laboratory animals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"53-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019892068\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019892068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019892068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of Improved Devices for Handling and Restraining Experimental Laboratory Mice.
Introduction: Most animal handling procedures are associated with injuries among veterinary staff and laboratory animal researchers. However, much of the currently available animal handling equipment is inadequate, limiting access to the treated animal or making workflow cumbersome. Moreover, restraining animals to perform procedures, such as blood collection or injection, elicits stress in both the animal and the worker. Herein, we present 4 home-built restraint and blood collection devices in extensive use in our institute.
Methods: Animal laboratory workers and experienced veterinarians regularly using the devices (n = 14) were asked to complete a survey ranking the contribution of the devices to worker safety and procedural efficiency.
Results: The overwhelming majority of responders (≥75%) associated all 4 devices with substantial improvements in worker safety and procedural efficiency. There were no reports of impaired workflow or safety when using the devices.
Discussion: Infection and exposure control may be implemented on various levels, including use of safer procedures, such as injection and blood collection devices. The presented intuitive handling and restraint devices allow the animal worker/researcher to perform various procedures safely and efficiently while eliciting less animal and worker stress. The devices can be easily adjusted to accommodate animal size and disease status.
Conclusion: The current devices will serve as prototypes for design of devices for larger laboratory animals.
Applied BiosafetyEnvironmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍:
Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.