无性别机器人的性别行动:仿人机器人行动中的性别归属。

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS
Gaye Aşkın, İmge Saltık, Tuğçe Elver Boz, Burcu A Urgen
{"title":"无性别机器人的性别行动:仿人机器人行动中的性别归属。","authors":"Gaye Aşkın, İmge Saltık, Tuğçe Elver Boz, Burcu A Urgen","doi":"10.1007/s12369-022-00964-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aims to investigate how gender stereotypes affect people's gender attribution to <i>social</i> robots. To this end, we examined whether a robot can be assigned a gender depending on a performed action. The study consists of 3 stages. In the first stage, we determined masculine and feminine actions by a survey conducted with 54 participants. In the second stage, we selected a gender-neutral robot by having 76 participants rate several robot stimuli in the masculine-feminine spectrum. In the third stage, we created short animation videos in which the gender-neutral robot determined in stage two performed the masculine and feminine actions determined in stage one. We then asked 102 participants to evaluate the robot in the videos in the masculine-feminine spectrum. We asked them to rate the videos according to their own view (self-view) and how they thought society would evaluate them (society-view). We also used the Socialization of Gender Norms Scale (SGNS) to identify individual differences in gender attribution to social robots. We found the main effect of action category (feminine vs. masculine) on both self-view reports and society-view reports suggesting that a neutral robot was reported to be feminine if it performed feminine actions and masculine if it performed masculine actions. However, society-view reports were more pronounced than the self-view reports: when the neutral robot performed masculine actions, it was found to be more masculine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports; and when it performs feminine actions, it was found to be more feminine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports. In addition, the SGNS predicted the society-view reports (for feminine actions) but not the self-view reports<i>.</i> In sum, our study suggests that people can attribute gender to social robots depending on the task they perform.</p>","PeriodicalId":14361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Robotics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.\",\"authors\":\"Gaye Aşkın, İmge Saltık, Tuğçe Elver Boz, Burcu A Urgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12369-022-00964-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study aims to investigate how gender stereotypes affect people's gender attribution to <i>social</i> robots. To this end, we examined whether a robot can be assigned a gender depending on a performed action. The study consists of 3 stages. In the first stage, we determined masculine and feminine actions by a survey conducted with 54 participants. In the second stage, we selected a gender-neutral robot by having 76 participants rate several robot stimuli in the masculine-feminine spectrum. In the third stage, we created short animation videos in which the gender-neutral robot determined in stage two performed the masculine and feminine actions determined in stage one. We then asked 102 participants to evaluate the robot in the videos in the masculine-feminine spectrum. We asked them to rate the videos according to their own view (self-view) and how they thought society would evaluate them (society-view). We also used the Socialization of Gender Norms Scale (SGNS) to identify individual differences in gender attribution to social robots. We found the main effect of action category (feminine vs. masculine) on both self-view reports and society-view reports suggesting that a neutral robot was reported to be feminine if it performed feminine actions and masculine if it performed masculine actions. However, society-view reports were more pronounced than the self-view reports: when the neutral robot performed masculine actions, it was found to be more masculine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports; and when it performs feminine actions, it was found to be more feminine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports. In addition, the SGNS predicted the society-view reports (for feminine actions) but not the self-view reports<i>.</i> In sum, our study suggests that people can attribute gender to social robots depending on the task they perform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Robotics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00964-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00964-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨性别刻板印象如何影响人们对社交机器人的性别归属。为此,我们研究了是否可以根据机器人所做的动作对其进行性别归属。研究分为三个阶段。在第一阶段,我们通过对 54 名参与者进行调查,确定了男性和女性动作。在第二阶段,我们通过让 76 名参与者对几种机器人刺激物进行男性化-女性化评分,选出了一个不分性别的机器人。在第三阶段,我们制作了动画短片,在视频中,第二阶段确定的中性机器人分别做出了第一阶段确定的男性化和女性化动作。然后,我们请 102 名参与者按照男性-女性光谱对视频中的机器人进行评价。我们要求他们根据自己的观点(自我观点)和他们认为社会会如何评价(社会观点)对视频进行评分。我们还使用了 "性别规范社会化量表"(SGNS)来确定社交机器人性别归属的个体差异。我们发现,动作类别(阴柔与阳刚)对自我观点报告和社会观点报告都有主效应,这表明如果中性机器人做出阴柔动作,则被报告为阴柔;如果做出阳刚动作,则被报告为阳刚。不过,社会视角报告比自我视角报告更明显:当中性机器人做出男性化动作时,社会视角报告中的中性机器人比自我视角报告中的中性机器人更男性化;而当中性机器人做出女性化动作时,社会视角报告中的中性机器人比自我视角报告中的中性机器人更女性化。此外,SGNS 还能预测社会视角报告(女性化行为),但不能预测自我视角报告。总之,我们的研究表明,人们可以根据社交机器人执行的任务对其进行性别归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.

Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.

Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.

Gendered Actions with a Genderless Robot: Gender Attribution to Humanoid Robots in Action.

The present study aims to investigate how gender stereotypes affect people's gender attribution to social robots. To this end, we examined whether a robot can be assigned a gender depending on a performed action. The study consists of 3 stages. In the first stage, we determined masculine and feminine actions by a survey conducted with 54 participants. In the second stage, we selected a gender-neutral robot by having 76 participants rate several robot stimuli in the masculine-feminine spectrum. In the third stage, we created short animation videos in which the gender-neutral robot determined in stage two performed the masculine and feminine actions determined in stage one. We then asked 102 participants to evaluate the robot in the videos in the masculine-feminine spectrum. We asked them to rate the videos according to their own view (self-view) and how they thought society would evaluate them (society-view). We also used the Socialization of Gender Norms Scale (SGNS) to identify individual differences in gender attribution to social robots. We found the main effect of action category (feminine vs. masculine) on both self-view reports and society-view reports suggesting that a neutral robot was reported to be feminine if it performed feminine actions and masculine if it performed masculine actions. However, society-view reports were more pronounced than the self-view reports: when the neutral robot performed masculine actions, it was found to be more masculine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports; and when it performs feminine actions, it was found to be more feminine in the society-view reports than the self-view reports. In addition, the SGNS predicted the society-view reports (for feminine actions) but not the self-view reports. In sum, our study suggests that people can attribute gender to social robots depending on the task they perform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Social Robotics is the study of robots that are able to interact and communicate among themselves, with humans, and with the environment, within the social and cultural structure attached to its role. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics related to the latest technologies, new research results and developments in the area of social robotics on all levels, from developments in core enabling technologies to system integration, aesthetic design, applications and social implications. It provides a platform for like-minded researchers to present their findings and latest developments in social robotics, covering relevant advances in engineering, computing, arts and social sciences. The journal publishes original, peer reviewed articles and contributions on innovative ideas and concepts, new discoveries and improvements, as well as novel applications, by leading researchers and developers regarding the latest fundamental advances in the core technologies that form the backbone of social robotics, distinguished developmental projects in the area, as well as seminal works in aesthetic design, ethics and philosophy, studies on social impact and influence, pertaining to social robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信