Bita Amani, Alejandra Cabral, Mienah Z Sharif, James Huỳnh, Kia Skrine Jeffers, Shelby A Baptista, Breann McAndrew, Natalie J Bradford, Patanjali de la Rocha, Chandra L Ford
{"title":"批判种族理论应用于新冠肺炎定性股票研究的综合方法","authors":"Bita Amani, Alejandra Cabral, Mienah Z Sharif, James Huỳnh, Kia Skrine Jeffers, Shelby A Baptista, Breann McAndrew, Natalie J Bradford, Patanjali de la Rocha, Chandra L Ford","doi":"10.18865/ed.32.3.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":"32 3","pages":"243-256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311305/pdf/ethndis-32-243.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.\",\"authors\":\"Bita Amani, Alejandra Cabral, Mienah Z Sharif, James Huỳnh, Kia Skrine Jeffers, Shelby A Baptista, Breann McAndrew, Natalie J Bradford, Patanjali de la Rocha, Chandra L Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.18865/ed.32.3.243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"243-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311305/pdf/ethndis-32-243.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.3.243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.3.243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.
Background: Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.
Objective: This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.
Sample: Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.
Design: We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.
Methods: A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.
Results: The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.
Conclusions: These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.