批判种族理论应用于新冠肺炎定性股票研究的综合方法

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bita Amani, Alejandra Cabral, Mienah Z Sharif, James Huỳnh, Kia Skrine Jeffers, Shelby A Baptista, Breann McAndrew, Natalie J Bradford, Patanjali de la Rocha, Chandra L Ford
{"title":"批判种族理论应用于新冠肺炎定性股票研究的综合方法","authors":"Bita Amani,&nbsp;Alejandra Cabral,&nbsp;Mienah Z Sharif,&nbsp;James Huỳnh,&nbsp;Kia Skrine Jeffers,&nbsp;Shelby A Baptista,&nbsp;Breann McAndrew,&nbsp;Natalie J Bradford,&nbsp;Patanjali de la Rocha,&nbsp;Chandra L Ford","doi":"10.18865/ed.32.3.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311305/pdf/ethndis-32-243.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.\",\"authors\":\"Bita Amani,&nbsp;Alejandra Cabral,&nbsp;Mienah Z Sharif,&nbsp;James Huỳnh,&nbsp;Kia Skrine Jeffers,&nbsp;Shelby A Baptista,&nbsp;Breann McAndrew,&nbsp;Natalie J Bradford,&nbsp;Patanjali de la Rocha,&nbsp;Chandra L Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.18865/ed.32.3.243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311305/pdf/ethndis-32-243.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.3.243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.3.243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:种族主义仍然存在,这突出表明有必要在大流行病期间迅速记录黑人、土著和有色人种群体以及边缘化人群(例如以前被监禁的人)的观点和经历。目的:本文提供了一个使用公共卫生关键种族实践(PHCRP)和相关关键方法(即女权主义和非殖民化方法)的模型,为应对不断演变的COVID-19大流行所进行的定性研究的概念化、方法和传播提供信息。样本:使用有目的的滚雪球抽样,我们确定了在BIPOC和社会边缘化人群中参与卫生公平和社会正义倡导的组织。焦点小组参与者(N=63)包括社区成员、组织者、活动家和卫生工作者。设计:我们使用Zoom软件快速连续进行特定主题(如生殖正义)和特定人群(如亚太岛民)焦点小组(N=16个焦点小组)。方法:以自我反思、迭代实践为指导,进行理论分析、数据收集和分析。我们在研究设计、半结构化讨论指南、伦理考虑和传播方面获得了社区的意见。应用PHCRP,我们迭代地评估我们的假设。我们逐字记录每一次采访,去识别数据,然后使用两种不同的定性技术对其进行编码和分析:主题分析,以确定在焦点小组中重复出现的统一概念;叙事分析,以保持每个参与者的故事完整。结果:实践促进了与合作伙伴的关系建立,并支持了假设的迭代评估。后勤方面的限制包括难以确保虚拟讨论的保密性。结论:这些新方法为大流行期间社区参与的定性研究提供了有效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

Integrated Methods for Applying Critical Race Theory to Qualitative COVID-19 Equity Research.

Background: Racism persists, underscoring the need to rapidly document the perspectives and experiences of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) groups as well as marginalized populations (eg, formerly incarcerated people) during pandemics.

Objective: This methods paper offers a model for using Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) and related critical methodologies (ie, feminist and decolonizing methods) to inform the conceptualization, methods, and dissemination of qualitative research undertaken in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.

Sample: Using purposive snowball sampling, we identified organizations involved with health equity and social justice advocacy among BIPOC and socially marginalized populations. Focus group participants (N=63) included community members, organizers, activists, and health workers.

Design: We conducted topic-specific (eg, reproductive justice) and population-specific (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander) focus groups (N=16 focus groups) in rapid succession using Zoom software.

Methods: A self-reflexive, iterative praxis guided theorization, data collection and analysis. We obtained community input on study design, the semi-structured discussion guide, ethical considerations and dissemination. Applying PHCRP, we assessed our assumptions iteratively. We transcribed each interview verbatim, de-identified the data, then used two distinct qualitative techniques to code and analyze them: thematic analysis to identify unifying concepts that recur across focus groups and narrative analysis to keep each participant's story intact.

Results: The praxis facilitated relationship-building with partners and supported the iterative assessment of assumptions. Logistical constraints included difficulty ensuring the confidentiality of virtual discussions.

Conclusions: These novel approaches provide an effective model for community-engaged qualitative research during a pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信