每周三次肝素冲洗干预儿童、青少年和青年癌症患者中心静脉导管插管的随机试验

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Kathleen Adlard, Carol Brown, Samantha Hayward, Jennifer Barrows, Lori MacLean
{"title":"每周三次肝素冲洗干预儿童、青少年和青年癌症患者中心静脉导管插管的随机试验","authors":"Kathleen Adlard,&nbsp;Carol Brown,&nbsp;Samantha Hayward,&nbsp;Jennifer Barrows,&nbsp;Lori MacLean","doi":"10.1177/27527530221090479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Children and adolescents with cancer often undergo aggressive treatment and receive supportive care requiring a long-term tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC). Regular flushing promotes TCVC patency when not in use (i.e., noninfusing). However, TCVC flushing guidelines and the current practice of daily flushing are not based on high-quality evidence. Few studies have compared the effect of less frequent flushing on TCVC patency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention, as compared to daily heparin flushing, in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with noninfusing TCVCs. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty children and AYAs were randomized to one of two groups, standard of care (SOC) (i.e., daily heparin flushing) or intervention (three times weekly heparin flushing) for 8 weeks. Feasibility data (recruitment, retention, acceptability, TCVC patency, and complications) were analyzed descriptively. <b>Results:</b> Twenty of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in the study (90% recruitment rate). Four participants discontinued the study early due to TCVC removal (20% attrition rate). One participant in each group had their TCVC removed due to a central line-associated bloodstream infection, one SOC group participant had their TCVC removed due to damage, and one intervention group participant had their TCVC removed due to discontinuation of treatment. No participants were withdrawn for safety concerns or because they did not find the protocol acceptable. <b>Conclusions:</b> It is feasible to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to investigate a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention in children and AYAs with TCVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Randomized Trial of a Three Times Weekly Heparin Flushing Intervention in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer With Tunneled Central Venous Catheters.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Adlard,&nbsp;Carol Brown,&nbsp;Samantha Hayward,&nbsp;Jennifer Barrows,&nbsp;Lori MacLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27527530221090479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Children and adolescents with cancer often undergo aggressive treatment and receive supportive care requiring a long-term tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC). Regular flushing promotes TCVC patency when not in use (i.e., noninfusing). However, TCVC flushing guidelines and the current practice of daily flushing are not based on high-quality evidence. Few studies have compared the effect of less frequent flushing on TCVC patency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention, as compared to daily heparin flushing, in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with noninfusing TCVCs. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty children and AYAs were randomized to one of two groups, standard of care (SOC) (i.e., daily heparin flushing) or intervention (three times weekly heparin flushing) for 8 weeks. Feasibility data (recruitment, retention, acceptability, TCVC patency, and complications) were analyzed descriptively. <b>Results:</b> Twenty of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in the study (90% recruitment rate). Four participants discontinued the study early due to TCVC removal (20% attrition rate). One participant in each group had their TCVC removed due to a central line-associated bloodstream infection, one SOC group participant had their TCVC removed due to damage, and one intervention group participant had their TCVC removed due to discontinuation of treatment. No participants were withdrawn for safety concerns or because they did not find the protocol acceptable. <b>Conclusions:</b> It is feasible to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to investigate a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention in children and AYAs with TCVCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530221090479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530221090479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有癌症的儿童和青少年经常接受积极的治疗,并接受支持性护理,需要长期隧道中心静脉导管(TCVC)。在不使用(即不输液)时,定期冲洗可促进TCVC通畅。然而,TCVC冲洗指南和目前每天冲洗的做法并不是基于高质量的证据。很少有研究比较较少的冲洗对TCVC通畅的影响。本研究的目的是评估每周三次肝素冲洗干预的可行性,与每日肝素冲洗相比,在非输注tcvc的儿童、青少年和年轻人(AYAs)中。方法:20名儿童和aya随机分为两组,标准护理(SOC)(即每日肝素冲洗)或干预(每周3次肝素冲洗),为期8周。可行性数据(招募、保留、可接受性、TCVC通畅和并发症)进行描述性分析。结果:22例符合条件的患者中有20例被纳入研究(90%的招募率)。4名参与者因TCVC去除(20%损耗率)而提前终止研究。每组中有一名参与者因中心线相关血流感染而切除了TCVC,一名SOC组参与者因损伤而切除了TCVC,一名干预组参与者因停止治疗而切除了TCVC。没有参与者因安全问题或因为他们不认为该方案可接受而被撤回。结论:开展一项大规模随机对照试验,研究每周3次肝素冲洗对tcvc患儿和aya的干预是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot Randomized Trial of a Three Times Weekly Heparin Flushing Intervention in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer With Tunneled Central Venous Catheters.

Background: Children and adolescents with cancer often undergo aggressive treatment and receive supportive care requiring a long-term tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC). Regular flushing promotes TCVC patency when not in use (i.e., noninfusing). However, TCVC flushing guidelines and the current practice of daily flushing are not based on high-quality evidence. Few studies have compared the effect of less frequent flushing on TCVC patency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention, as compared to daily heparin flushing, in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with noninfusing TCVCs. Methods: Twenty children and AYAs were randomized to one of two groups, standard of care (SOC) (i.e., daily heparin flushing) or intervention (three times weekly heparin flushing) for 8 weeks. Feasibility data (recruitment, retention, acceptability, TCVC patency, and complications) were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in the study (90% recruitment rate). Four participants discontinued the study early due to TCVC removal (20% attrition rate). One participant in each group had their TCVC removed due to a central line-associated bloodstream infection, one SOC group participant had their TCVC removed due to damage, and one intervention group participant had their TCVC removed due to discontinuation of treatment. No participants were withdrawn for safety concerns or because they did not find the protocol acceptable. Conclusions: It is feasible to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to investigate a three times weekly heparin flushing intervention in children and AYAs with TCVCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信