二语作家在一年级写作课程中的引用实践:形式、修辞功能和与教学材料的联系

Jie Gao , Adriana Picoral , Shelley Staples , Lindsey Macdonald
{"title":"二语作家在一年级写作课程中的引用实践:形式、修辞功能和与教学材料的联系","authors":"Jie Gao ,&nbsp;Adriana Picoral ,&nbsp;Shelley Staples ,&nbsp;Lindsey Macdonald","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Citation practices are an important part of academic writing, and undergraduate writers often struggle to effectively integrate citation forms and functions into their writing. While many studies have focused on citation use by English as a first language (L1) student writers, English as a second language (L2) writers at advanced levels, and published writers, less is known about how undergraduate L2 writers use citations across assignments in First-Year Writing contexts, particularly in relation to the pedagogical materials provided by classroom teachers. Using a corpus of 74 papers, this study sheds light on how L2 writers’ citations vary in form and rhetorical function across two assignments (Literature Review and Research Paper) and two instructors. We also examine how students’ citation practices are influenced by the pedagogical materials provided for each assignment (<em>N</em> = 22). After manually coding student writers’ citation practices and instructors’ pedagogical materials, findings show that both assignment type and instructor play a role in L2 writers’ citation choices. Generally, writers in our study use integral citations (e.g., “Author (YEAR) argues that …”) more frequently in the Literature Review assignment. Non=integral citations, characterized by researchers’ names at the end of a sentence, are found in the Research Paper assignment at a higher frequency. Students also make use of hybrid citations, not previously discussed in the literature, but which are a combination of integral and non-integral citations. In terms of rhetorical function, attribution only (the baseline function of a citation, indicating an attribution to an external source) is most frequently used across assignments, and other functions were found much less frequently. These findings are discussed in light of an analysis of pedagogical materials, which emphasize citation form. Model student papers also show a direct relationship with students’ citation practices. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy design include a need for more diversified pedagogical support in the classroom.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100005","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citation practices of L2 writers in first-year writing courses: Form, rhetorical function, and connection with pedagogical materials\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gao ,&nbsp;Adriana Picoral ,&nbsp;Shelley Staples ,&nbsp;Lindsey Macdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Citation practices are an important part of academic writing, and undergraduate writers often struggle to effectively integrate citation forms and functions into their writing. While many studies have focused on citation use by English as a first language (L1) student writers, English as a second language (L2) writers at advanced levels, and published writers, less is known about how undergraduate L2 writers use citations across assignments in First-Year Writing contexts, particularly in relation to the pedagogical materials provided by classroom teachers. Using a corpus of 74 papers, this study sheds light on how L2 writers’ citations vary in form and rhetorical function across two assignments (Literature Review and Research Paper) and two instructors. We also examine how students’ citation practices are influenced by the pedagogical materials provided for each assignment (<em>N</em> = 22). After manually coding student writers’ citation practices and instructors’ pedagogical materials, findings show that both assignment type and instructor play a role in L2 writers’ citation choices. Generally, writers in our study use integral citations (e.g., “Author (YEAR) argues that …”) more frequently in the Literature Review assignment. Non=integral citations, characterized by researchers’ names at the end of a sentence, are found in the Research Paper assignment at a higher frequency. Students also make use of hybrid citations, not previously discussed in the literature, but which are a combination of integral and non-integral citations. In terms of rhetorical function, attribution only (the baseline function of a citation, indicating an attribution to an external source) is most frequently used across assignments, and other functions were found much less frequently. These findings are discussed in light of an analysis of pedagogical materials, which emphasize citation form. Model student papers also show a direct relationship with students’ citation practices. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy design include a need for more diversified pedagogical support in the classroom.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Corpus Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100005\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Corpus Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799121000058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799121000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引文实践是学术写作的重要组成部分,大学生作者往往难以有效地将引文的形式和功能整合到他们的写作中。虽然许多研究都集中在以英语为第一语言(L1)的学生作家、高级水平的以英语为第二语言(L2)的作家和出版作家的引文使用上,但对于本科第二语言作家在第一年写作环境中如何在作业中使用引文,特别是与课堂教师提供的教学材料有关的引文,我们知之甚少。本研究使用74篇论文的语料库,揭示了二语作者在两份作业(文献综述和研究论文)和两名教师中引用的形式和修辞功能的变化。我们还研究了为每个作业提供的教学材料如何影响学生的引用实践(N = 22)。在对学生作者的引用实践和教师的教学材料进行手工编码后,研究结果表明,作业类型和教师对第二语言作者的引用选择都有影响。一般来说,我们研究中的作者在文献综述作业中更频繁地使用完整引用(例如,“Author (YEAR) argue that…”)。在研究论文作业中,以研究人员姓名为特征的非积分引用出现的频率更高。学生还会使用混合引用,这在以前的文献中没有讨论过,但它是积分和非积分引用的结合。就修辞功能而言,仅归属(引用的基线功能,表明对外部来源的归属)是在分配中最常用的,其他功能的使用频率要低得多。这些发现是在强调引用形式的教学材料分析的基础上讨论的。模范学生论文也显示出与学生引用实践的直接关系。对第二语言写作教学法设计的启示包括在课堂上需要更多样化的教学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citation practices of L2 writers in first-year writing courses: Form, rhetorical function, and connection with pedagogical materials

Citation practices are an important part of academic writing, and undergraduate writers often struggle to effectively integrate citation forms and functions into their writing. While many studies have focused on citation use by English as a first language (L1) student writers, English as a second language (L2) writers at advanced levels, and published writers, less is known about how undergraduate L2 writers use citations across assignments in First-Year Writing contexts, particularly in relation to the pedagogical materials provided by classroom teachers. Using a corpus of 74 papers, this study sheds light on how L2 writers’ citations vary in form and rhetorical function across two assignments (Literature Review and Research Paper) and two instructors. We also examine how students’ citation practices are influenced by the pedagogical materials provided for each assignment (N = 22). After manually coding student writers’ citation practices and instructors’ pedagogical materials, findings show that both assignment type and instructor play a role in L2 writers’ citation choices. Generally, writers in our study use integral citations (e.g., “Author (YEAR) argues that …”) more frequently in the Literature Review assignment. Non=integral citations, characterized by researchers’ names at the end of a sentence, are found in the Research Paper assignment at a higher frequency. Students also make use of hybrid citations, not previously discussed in the literature, but which are a combination of integral and non-integral citations. In terms of rhetorical function, attribution only (the baseline function of a citation, indicating an attribution to an external source) is most frequently used across assignments, and other functions were found much less frequently. These findings are discussed in light of an analysis of pedagogical materials, which emphasize citation form. Model student papers also show a direct relationship with students’ citation practices. Implications for L2 writing pedagogy design include a need for more diversified pedagogical support in the classroom.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信