增加对临床调查要求的认识。

Q2 Health Professions
Brogan Guest, Amy Donaldson-Perrott, Beck Hickman, Chandran Louis, Tamara Ritsema, Karen Roberts
{"title":"增加对临床调查要求的认识。","authors":"Brogan Guest, Amy Donaldson-Perrott, Beck Hickman, Chandran Louis, Tamara Ritsema, Karen Roberts","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Overtesting, ordering diagnostic investigations that do not help diagnose or manage a patient, is well-recognized as a problem across multiple healthcare settings in developed countries. One of the reasons often cited for overtesting is a lack of confidence or knowledge, so this article addresses our attempt to reduce overtesting through an investigation-specific course for a physician associate (PA) program based in the United Kingdom. We found no evidence of pedagogical literature that focused on clinical diagnostics teaching and assessment for PAs, so we aim to be the first to provide this research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess student confidence, student feedback was collected through open-ended focus groups and qualitative surveys. The effectiveness of the course was evaluated through students' scores on investigation single best answer assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, qualitative feedback from students showed an increase in knowledge in accurate investigation requests and interpretation. Students' assessment scores show a marked improvement after the implementation of the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This approach to an investigation-specific course, with a focus on limiting overinvestigating, demonstrates improved student performance on investigation assessments at the university level.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Knowledge in the Requesting of Clinical Investigations.\",\"authors\":\"Brogan Guest, Amy Donaldson-Perrott, Beck Hickman, Chandran Louis, Tamara Ritsema, Karen Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Overtesting, ordering diagnostic investigations that do not help diagnose or manage a patient, is well-recognized as a problem across multiple healthcare settings in developed countries. One of the reasons often cited for overtesting is a lack of confidence or knowledge, so this article addresses our attempt to reduce overtesting through an investigation-specific course for a physician associate (PA) program based in the United Kingdom. We found no evidence of pedagogical literature that focused on clinical diagnostics teaching and assessment for PAs, so we aim to be the first to provide this research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess student confidence, student feedback was collected through open-ended focus groups and qualitative surveys. The effectiveness of the course was evaluated through students' scores on investigation single best answer assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, qualitative feedback from students showed an increase in knowledge in accurate investigation requests and interpretation. Students' assessment scores show a marked improvement after the implementation of the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This approach to an investigation-specific course, with a focus on limiting overinvestigating, demonstrates improved student performance on investigation assessments at the university level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在发达国家的多个医疗保健机构中,过度检测、下令进行无助于诊断或管理患者的诊断调查是公认的问题。经常被引用的过度测试的原因之一是缺乏信心或知识,因此本文通过英国医师助理(PA)计划的调查特定课程来解决我们减少过度测试的尝试。我们没有发现任何关于临床诊断教学和评估的教学文献证据,所以我们的目标是成为第一个提供这项研究的人。方法:通过开放式焦点小组和定性调查收集学生反馈,评估学生信心。课程的有效性通过学生的调查单最佳答案评估分数来评估。结果:总体而言,学生的定性反馈表明,他们在准确的调查请求和解释方面的知识有所增加。课程实施后,学生的评估成绩有了明显的提高。结论:这种针对调查特定课程的方法,侧重于限制过度调查,证明了学生在大学水平的调查评估中的表现有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Knowledge in the Requesting of Clinical Investigations.

Purpose: Overtesting, ordering diagnostic investigations that do not help diagnose or manage a patient, is well-recognized as a problem across multiple healthcare settings in developed countries. One of the reasons often cited for overtesting is a lack of confidence or knowledge, so this article addresses our attempt to reduce overtesting through an investigation-specific course for a physician associate (PA) program based in the United Kingdom. We found no evidence of pedagogical literature that focused on clinical diagnostics teaching and assessment for PAs, so we aim to be the first to provide this research.

Methods: To assess student confidence, student feedback was collected through open-ended focus groups and qualitative surveys. The effectiveness of the course was evaluated through students' scores on investigation single best answer assessments.

Results: Overall, qualitative feedback from students showed an increase in knowledge in accurate investigation requests and interpretation. Students' assessment scores show a marked improvement after the implementation of the course.

Conclusion: This approach to an investigation-specific course, with a focus on limiting overinvestigating, demonstrates improved student performance on investigation assessments at the university level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信