{"title":"使用剂量-面积乘积评估机器人放射外科手术的计划质量。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), optimal selection of collimators from a set of fixed cones must be determined manually by trial and error. A unique and uniformly scaled metric to characterize plan quality could help identify Pareto-efficient treatment plans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The concept of dose-area product (DAP) was used to define a measure (DAP<sub>ratio</sub>) of the targeting efficiency of a set of beams by relating the integral DAP of the beams to the mean dose achieved in the target volume. In a retrospective study of five clinical cases of brain metastases with representative target volumes (range: 0.5–5.68 ml) and 121 treatment plans with all possible collimator choices, the DAP<sub>ratio</sub> was determined along with other plan metrics (conformity index CI, gradient index R50%, treatment time, total number of monitor units TotalMU, radiotoxicity index f12, and energy efficiency index η50%), and the respective Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. The ability of DAP<sub>ratio</sub> to determine Pareto efficiency for collimator selection at DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1 and DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9 was tested using scatter plots.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DAP<sub>ratio</sub> for all plans was on average 0.95 ± 0.13 (range: 0.61–1.31). Only the variance of the DAP<sub>ratio</sub> was strongly dependent on the number of collimators. For each target, there was a strong or very strong correlation of DAP<sub>ratio</sub> with all other metrics of plan quality. Only for R50% and η50% was there a moderate correlation with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> for the plans of all targets combined, as R50% and η50% strongly depended on target size. Optimal treatment plans with CI, R50%, f12, and η50% close to 1 were clearly associated with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1, and plans with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9 were even superior, but at the cost of longer treatment times and higher total monitor units.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The newly defined DAP<sub>ratio</sub> has been demonstrated to be a metric that characterizes the target efficiency of a set of beams in robotic SRS in one single and uniformly scaled number. A DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1 indicates Pareto efficiency. The trade-off between plan quality on the one hand and short treatment time or low total monitor units on the other hand is also represented by DAP<sub>ratio</sub>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000016/pdfft?md5=11d050dcb968a77bf2766b4dbaca3618&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923000016-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of dose-area product to assess plan quality in robotic radiosurgery\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), optimal selection of collimators from a set of fixed cones must be determined manually by trial and error. A unique and uniformly scaled metric to characterize plan quality could help identify Pareto-efficient treatment plans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The concept of dose-area product (DAP) was used to define a measure (DAP<sub>ratio</sub>) of the targeting efficiency of a set of beams by relating the integral DAP of the beams to the mean dose achieved in the target volume. In a retrospective study of five clinical cases of brain metastases with representative target volumes (range: 0.5–5.68 ml) and 121 treatment plans with all possible collimator choices, the DAP<sub>ratio</sub> was determined along with other plan metrics (conformity index CI, gradient index R50%, treatment time, total number of monitor units TotalMU, radiotoxicity index f12, and energy efficiency index η50%), and the respective Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. The ability of DAP<sub>ratio</sub> to determine Pareto efficiency for collimator selection at DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1 and DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9 was tested using scatter plots.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DAP<sub>ratio</sub> for all plans was on average 0.95 ± 0.13 (range: 0.61–1.31). Only the variance of the DAP<sub>ratio</sub> was strongly dependent on the number of collimators. For each target, there was a strong or very strong correlation of DAP<sub>ratio</sub> with all other metrics of plan quality. Only for R50% and η50% was there a moderate correlation with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> for the plans of all targets combined, as R50% and η50% strongly depended on target size. Optimal treatment plans with CI, R50%, f12, and η50% close to 1 were clearly associated with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1, and plans with DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 0.9 were even superior, but at the cost of longer treatment times and higher total monitor units.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The newly defined DAP<sub>ratio</sub> has been demonstrated to be a metric that characterizes the target efficiency of a set of beams in robotic SRS in one single and uniformly scaled number. A DAP<sub>ratio</sub> < 1 indicates Pareto efficiency. The trade-off between plan quality on the one hand and short treatment time or low total monitor units on the other hand is also represented by DAP<sub>ratio</sub>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000016/pdfft?md5=11d050dcb968a77bf2766b4dbaca3618&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923000016-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of dose-area product to assess plan quality in robotic radiosurgery
Purpose
In robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), optimal selection of collimators from a set of fixed cones must be determined manually by trial and error. A unique and uniformly scaled metric to characterize plan quality could help identify Pareto-efficient treatment plans.
Methods
The concept of dose-area product (DAP) was used to define a measure (DAPratio) of the targeting efficiency of a set of beams by relating the integral DAP of the beams to the mean dose achieved in the target volume. In a retrospective study of five clinical cases of brain metastases with representative target volumes (range: 0.5–5.68 ml) and 121 treatment plans with all possible collimator choices, the DAPratio was determined along with other plan metrics (conformity index CI, gradient index R50%, treatment time, total number of monitor units TotalMU, radiotoxicity index f12, and energy efficiency index η50%), and the respective Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. The ability of DAPratio to determine Pareto efficiency for collimator selection at DAPratio < 1 and DAPratio < 0.9 was tested using scatter plots.
Results
The DAPratio for all plans was on average 0.95 ± 0.13 (range: 0.61–1.31). Only the variance of the DAPratio was strongly dependent on the number of collimators. For each target, there was a strong or very strong correlation of DAPratio with all other metrics of plan quality. Only for R50% and η50% was there a moderate correlation with DAPratio for the plans of all targets combined, as R50% and η50% strongly depended on target size. Optimal treatment plans with CI, R50%, f12, and η50% close to 1 were clearly associated with DAPratio < 1, and plans with DAPratio < 0.9 were even superior, but at the cost of longer treatment times and higher total monitor units.
Conclusions
The newly defined DAPratio has been demonstrated to be a metric that characterizes the target efficiency of a set of beams in robotic SRS in one single and uniformly scaled number. A DAPratio < 1 indicates Pareto efficiency. The trade-off between plan quality on the one hand and short treatment time or low total monitor units on the other hand is also represented by DAPratio.