富血小板纤维蛋白膜与游离牙龈移植物在增加牙种植体周围角化粘膜宽度方面的比较:一项裂口随机临床研究。

Zeinab Al-Diasty, Samah El-Meadawy, Ahmed S Salem, Bassant Mowafey
{"title":"富血小板纤维蛋白膜与游离牙龈移植物在增加牙种植体周围角化粘膜宽度方面的比较:一项裂口随机临床研究。","authors":"Zeinab Al-Diasty,&nbsp;Samah El-Meadawy,&nbsp;Ahmed S Salem,&nbsp;Bassant Mowafey","doi":"10.34172/japid.2022.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> This study aimed to compare the use of the platelet-rich fibrin membrane (PRF) versus the free gingival graft (FGG) during the second stage of the dental implant to increase the amount of keratinized mucosa around dental implants. <b>Methods.</b> Fifteen patients with bilaterally missing teeth and deficient width of the keratinized mucosa (KM) were recruited for a spit-mouth randomized controlled trial. After implant placement on the control sides, onlay FGG was used, whereas, on the other side (study side), onlay PRF membranes were applied to augment the KM. One month and three months after augmentation, the increase in keratinized mucosa width, bone level around the implants, and soft tissue health were evaluated and compared. The shrinkage percentage was also calculated for both grafts. <b>Results.</b> There was a significant increase in the width of KM in the FGG and PRF groups; however, it was observed that FFG resulted in significantly better results than PRF, with no significant difference in peri-implant soft tissue health or bone level. <b>Conclusion.</b> Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the onlay PRF membrane could increase the keratinized mucosa width around dental implants with the advantages of a lower surgical time and less postoperative discomfort and pain for the patients in comparison to the FGG. However, FGG had a significantly higher ability to augment and increase keratinized mucosa around dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"14 2","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Al-Diasty,&nbsp;Samah El-Meadawy,&nbsp;Ahmed S Salem,&nbsp;Bassant Mowafey\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/japid.2022.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> This study aimed to compare the use of the platelet-rich fibrin membrane (PRF) versus the free gingival graft (FGG) during the second stage of the dental implant to increase the amount of keratinized mucosa around dental implants. <b>Methods.</b> Fifteen patients with bilaterally missing teeth and deficient width of the keratinized mucosa (KM) were recruited for a spit-mouth randomized controlled trial. After implant placement on the control sides, onlay FGG was used, whereas, on the other side (study side), onlay PRF membranes were applied to augment the KM. One month and three months after augmentation, the increase in keratinized mucosa width, bone level around the implants, and soft tissue health were evaluated and compared. The shrinkage percentage was also calculated for both grafts. <b>Results.</b> There was a significant increase in the width of KM in the FGG and PRF groups; however, it was observed that FFG resulted in significantly better results than PRF, with no significant difference in peri-implant soft tissue health or bone level. <b>Conclusion.</b> Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the onlay PRF membrane could increase the keratinized mucosa width around dental implants with the advantages of a lower surgical time and less postoperative discomfort and pain for the patients in comparison to the FGG. However, FGG had a significantly higher ability to augment and increase keratinized mucosa around dental implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"53-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。本研究旨在比较富血小板纤维蛋白膜(PRF)与游离牙龈移植物(FGG)在牙种植体第二阶段的应用,以增加牙种植体周围角化粘膜的数量。方法。本研究招募了15例双侧缺牙和角化粘膜宽度不足的患者进行口吐随机对照试验。在对照侧放置植入物后,使用覆盖的FGG,而在另一侧(研究侧),应用覆盖的PRF膜来增加KM。在隆胸1个月和3个月后,评估并比较角化粘膜宽度、种植体周围骨水平和软组织健康状况的增加。还计算了两个移植物的收缩百分比。结果。FGG和PRF组KM宽度显著增加;然而,观察到FFG的结果明显优于PRF,种植体周围软组织健康或骨水平无显著差异。结论。在本研究的局限性内,我们得出结论,与FGG相比,覆盖PRF膜可以增加种植体周围角化粘膜的宽度,并且具有手术时间短,患者术后不适和疼痛少的优点。然而,FGG对牙种植体周围角质化黏膜的增强和增加作用明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study.

Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study.

Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study.

Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A split-mouth randomized clinical study.

Background. This study aimed to compare the use of the platelet-rich fibrin membrane (PRF) versus the free gingival graft (FGG) during the second stage of the dental implant to increase the amount of keratinized mucosa around dental implants. Methods. Fifteen patients with bilaterally missing teeth and deficient width of the keratinized mucosa (KM) were recruited for a spit-mouth randomized controlled trial. After implant placement on the control sides, onlay FGG was used, whereas, on the other side (study side), onlay PRF membranes were applied to augment the KM. One month and three months after augmentation, the increase in keratinized mucosa width, bone level around the implants, and soft tissue health were evaluated and compared. The shrinkage percentage was also calculated for both grafts. Results. There was a significant increase in the width of KM in the FGG and PRF groups; however, it was observed that FFG resulted in significantly better results than PRF, with no significant difference in peri-implant soft tissue health or bone level. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the onlay PRF membrane could increase the keratinized mucosa width around dental implants with the advantages of a lower surgical time and less postoperative discomfort and pain for the patients in comparison to the FGG. However, FGG had a significantly higher ability to augment and increase keratinized mucosa around dental implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信