COVID-19 和远程医疗服务对心理治疗损耗率的影响。

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rylan B Hellstern, W David Robinson
{"title":"COVID-19 和远程医疗服务对心理治疗损耗率的影响。","authors":"Rylan B Hellstern, W David Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attrition in psychotherapy has been identified as a significant obstacle in the productive delivery of mental health services. Defined generally as the ending of a treatment prior to proper optimal benefit, attrition both hinders treatment efficacy and costeffectiveness in therapy. With the demands for quality mental health services increasing, resources must be identified to reduce barriers to such services. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the emergence of one potential resources: telehealth services. The current study aims to identify how COVID-19 and telehealth services have influenced attrition by analyzing attrition rates from both before and during the pandemic in a community health center where a transition to telehealth was made at the start of the pandemic. In addition, the variables of age, gender, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage were also tested as potential predictors of attrition. Using de-identified patient information, clients who had participated in therapy services within a six-month period at a community health center (N = 329) were selected. A survival analysis was used to assess the time taken from initial appointment to the point of attrition. Results indicated that those who attended therapy via telehealth were less likely to stop attending treatment than those who participated in therapy in person. Individuals who used both in-person and telehealth visits were the least likely to terminate treatment prematurely. Clinical implications include the need for therapists to offer both telehealth and in-person services in order to give clients more resources to reduce a large barrier to needed mental healthcare treatment.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0.</p>","PeriodicalId":51600,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of COVID-19 and Telehealth Services on Attrition Rates in Psychotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Rylan B Hellstern, W David Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Attrition in psychotherapy has been identified as a significant obstacle in the productive delivery of mental health services. Defined generally as the ending of a treatment prior to proper optimal benefit, attrition both hinders treatment efficacy and costeffectiveness in therapy. With the demands for quality mental health services increasing, resources must be identified to reduce barriers to such services. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the emergence of one potential resources: telehealth services. The current study aims to identify how COVID-19 and telehealth services have influenced attrition by analyzing attrition rates from both before and during the pandemic in a community health center where a transition to telehealth was made at the start of the pandemic. In addition, the variables of age, gender, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage were also tested as potential predictors of attrition. Using de-identified patient information, clients who had participated in therapy services within a six-month period at a community health center (N = 329) were selected. A survival analysis was used to assess the time taken from initial appointment to the point of attrition. Results indicated that those who attended therapy via telehealth were less likely to stop attending treatment than those who participated in therapy in person. Individuals who used both in-person and telehealth visits were the least likely to terminate treatment prematurely. Clinical implications include the need for therapists to offer both telehealth and in-person services in order to give clients more resources to reduce a large barrier to needed mental healthcare treatment.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理治疗中的自然减员被认为是心理健康服务取得成效的一大障碍。流失一般被定义为在获得最佳治疗效果之前结束治疗,它既妨碍了治疗效果,也影响了治疗的成本效益。随着人们对优质心理健康服务的需求日益增长,必须找到资源来减少获得此类服务的障碍。COVID-19 的流行导致了一种潜在资源的出现:远程医疗服务。本研究旨在通过分析大流行前和大流行期间的自然减员率,确定 COVID-19 和远程医疗服务对自然减员的影响。此外,还对年龄、性别、社会经济地位和保险范围等变量进行了测试,将其作为流失的潜在预测因素。利用去标识化的患者信息,选取了在六个月内曾在社区医疗中心接受过治疗服务的患者(N = 329)。我们使用生存分析来评估从初次预约到流失所花费的时间。结果表明,与亲自参加治疗的人相比,通过远程医疗参加治疗的人停止治疗的可能性较小。同时使用亲诊和远程医疗就诊的人最不可能过早终止治疗。临床意义包括治疗师需要同时提供远程医疗和面对面服务,以便为客户提供更多的资源,减少心理保健治疗的巨大障碍:在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0上获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Impact of COVID-19 and Telehealth Services on Attrition Rates in Psychotherapy.

The Impact of COVID-19 and Telehealth Services on Attrition Rates in Psychotherapy.

Attrition in psychotherapy has been identified as a significant obstacle in the productive delivery of mental health services. Defined generally as the ending of a treatment prior to proper optimal benefit, attrition both hinders treatment efficacy and costeffectiveness in therapy. With the demands for quality mental health services increasing, resources must be identified to reduce barriers to such services. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the emergence of one potential resources: telehealth services. The current study aims to identify how COVID-19 and telehealth services have influenced attrition by analyzing attrition rates from both before and during the pandemic in a community health center where a transition to telehealth was made at the start of the pandemic. In addition, the variables of age, gender, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage were also tested as potential predictors of attrition. Using de-identified patient information, clients who had participated in therapy services within a six-month period at a community health center (N = 329) were selected. A survival analysis was used to assess the time taken from initial appointment to the point of attrition. Results indicated that those who attended therapy via telehealth were less likely to stop attending treatment than those who participated in therapy in person. Individuals who used both in-person and telehealth visits were the least likely to terminate treatment prematurely. Clinical implications include the need for therapists to offer both telehealth and in-person services in order to give clients more resources to reduce a large barrier to needed mental healthcare treatment.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10591-023-09661-0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY
CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal (COFT) is is a quarterly, peer-reviewed publication that presents the latest developments in research, practice, theory, and training in couple and family therapy. COFT publishes applied and basic research with implications for systemic theory, treatment, and policy. COFT appreciates a multidisciplinary approach, and welcomes manuscripts which address processes and outcomes in systemic treatment across modalities and within broader social contexts. The journal’s content is relevant to systemic therapy practitioners and researchers, as well as marriage and family therapists, family psychologists, clinical social workers, and social policy specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信