智利初级保健提供者对研究的重视程度和兴趣。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diego García-Huidobro, Marcela Aracena, Paulina Bravo, Karla González, Mauricio Soto, Pamela von Borries, Jaime C Sapag
{"title":"智利初级保健提供者对研究的重视程度和兴趣。","authors":"Diego García-Huidobro, Marcela Aracena, Paulina Bravo, Karla González, Mauricio Soto, Pamela von Borries, Jaime C Sapag","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs) are relevant stakeholders for primary care research (PCR).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the perceived importance and interest in PCR of a national sample of Chilean PCPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Chilean PCPs. An electronic survey assessing perceived relevance of PCR, research training and experience, training interests, and demographics was disseminated through emails and WhatsApp messages. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals for high interest in PCR, high interest in using research methods, and high interest in receiving research training, and predictors of these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 providers completed the online survey. Only 26.4% of PCPs had research experience as a principal or co-investigator. However, most clinicians perceived PCR as very important (92.5%) and were interested in using research methods (90.7%) and receiving training (94.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in these perceptions between provider's discipline, role, sex, age, and geographical location after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite few Chilean PCPs have research training, a large majority perceive it as important, are interested in using it in their practice and would like to receive training.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived importance and interest in research by Chilean primary care providers.\",\"authors\":\"Diego García-Huidobro, Marcela Aracena, Paulina Bravo, Karla González, Mauricio Soto, Pamela von Borries, Jaime C Sapag\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmad012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs) are relevant stakeholders for primary care research (PCR).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the perceived importance and interest in PCR of a national sample of Chilean PCPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Chilean PCPs. An electronic survey assessing perceived relevance of PCR, research training and experience, training interests, and demographics was disseminated through emails and WhatsApp messages. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals for high interest in PCR, high interest in using research methods, and high interest in receiving research training, and predictors of these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 providers completed the online survey. Only 26.4% of PCPs had research experience as a principal or co-investigator. However, most clinicians perceived PCR as very important (92.5%) and were interested in using research methods (90.7%) and receiving training (94.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in these perceptions between provider's discipline, role, sex, age, and geographical location after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite few Chilean PCPs have research training, a large majority perceive it as important, are interested in using it in their practice and would like to receive training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:初级保健提供者是初级保健研究(PCR)的相关利益方:初级保健提供者(PCPs)是初级保健研究(PCR)的相关利益方:我们报告了智利全国初级保健提供者样本对初级保健研究的重要性和兴趣:方法:我们针对智利初级保健医生开展了一项横断面研究。我们通过电子邮件和 WhatsApp 消息发布了一项电子调查,对 PCR 的相关性、研究培训和经验、培训兴趣以及人口统计学进行了评估。调查采用描述性统计来总结数据。使用逻辑回归模型估算了对 PCR 的高兴趣、对使用研究方法的高兴趣、对接受研究培训的高兴趣的调整概率和 95% 的置信区间,以及这些结果的预测因素:共有 387 名医疗服务提供者完成了在线调查。只有 26.4% 的初级保健医生曾作为主要研究者或合作研究者进行过研究。然而,大多数临床医生认为 PCR 非常重要(92.5%),并对使用研究方法(90.7%)和接受培训(94.3%)感兴趣。经过协变量调整后,不同学科、不同角色、不同性别、不同年龄和不同地理位置的医疗服务提供者对 PCR 的认识在统计学上没有明显差异:尽管接受过研究培训的智利初级保健医生很少,但大多数人认为研究培训很重要,有兴趣在实践中使用研究培训,并希望接受培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived importance and interest in research by Chilean primary care providers.

Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) are relevant stakeholders for primary care research (PCR).

Objective: We report the perceived importance and interest in PCR of a national sample of Chilean PCPs.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Chilean PCPs. An electronic survey assessing perceived relevance of PCR, research training and experience, training interests, and demographics was disseminated through emails and WhatsApp messages. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals for high interest in PCR, high interest in using research methods, and high interest in receiving research training, and predictors of these outcomes.

Results: A total of 387 providers completed the online survey. Only 26.4% of PCPs had research experience as a principal or co-investigator. However, most clinicians perceived PCR as very important (92.5%) and were interested in using research methods (90.7%) and receiving training (94.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in these perceptions between provider's discipline, role, sex, age, and geographical location after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusions: Despite few Chilean PCPs have research training, a large majority perceive it as important, are interested in using it in their practice and would like to receive training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信