尼泊尔加德满都三级保健医院患者中产生β -内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性细菌分离株

Manita Pariyar, Sanjib Adhikari, Ramesh Sharma Regmi, Binod Dhungel, Megha Raj Banjara, Basista Prasad Rijal, Komal Raj Rijal, Prakash Ghimire
{"title":"尼泊尔加德满都三级保健医院患者中产生β -内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性细菌分离株","authors":"Manita Pariyar,&nbsp;Sanjib Adhikari,&nbsp;Ramesh Sharma Regmi,&nbsp;Binod Dhungel,&nbsp;Megha Raj Banjara,&nbsp;Basista Prasad Rijal,&nbsp;Komal Raj Rijal,&nbsp;Prakash Ghimire","doi":"10.1177/11786361221150761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the times, carbapenems have been the choice of drug for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. The current study aimed at determining the occurrence of metallo beta-lactamase (MBL) and AmpC beta-lactamase (ABL) in gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the patients visiting Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital (MMTH), Kathmandu, Nepal from August 2017 to January 2018. A total of 4351 samples including urine, pus, wound swab, endotracheal tip, catheter tip, and blood were collected from the patients and processed by standard conventional microbiological methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of the isolates was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Double disc synergy test was performed on carbapenem resistant organisms to detect production of MBL and inhibitor-based test was used for the detection of ABL production. Of the 4351 samples, 421 bacterial isolates belonging to 16 different genera were recovered, of which 303 (71.97%) were Gram negative bacilli (GNB). <i>E. coli</i> (189/303) and <i>S. aureus</i> (80/118) were the most prevalent among gram negatives and gram positives, respectively. Bacterial incidence was found significantly associated with gender, specimen type, and the department where the patients were enrolled. Colistin-sulfate and polymycin-B were the most effective drug against GNB, whereas imipenem against gram positives. Prevalence of MDR and methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) was 35.15% and 60%, respectively. The prevalence of MBL and ABL-producing isolate was 11(3.6%) and 13(4.3%), respectively. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (5/11) and <i>E. coli</i> (9/13) were the major MBL and ABL producers, respectively. MBL and ABL production was found to be significantly associated with the age of the patient and the specimen type. A regular antibiotic surveillance activity with screening for MBL and ABL-producing bacterial isolates in the hospital settings to curb the incidence and transmission of such difficult-to-treat pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74187,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"11786361221150761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/3e/10.1177_11786361221150761.PMC9880579.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates Among the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Manita Pariyar,&nbsp;Sanjib Adhikari,&nbsp;Ramesh Sharma Regmi,&nbsp;Binod Dhungel,&nbsp;Megha Raj Banjara,&nbsp;Basista Prasad Rijal,&nbsp;Komal Raj Rijal,&nbsp;Prakash Ghimire\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11786361221150761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the times, carbapenems have been the choice of drug for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. The current study aimed at determining the occurrence of metallo beta-lactamase (MBL) and AmpC beta-lactamase (ABL) in gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the patients visiting Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital (MMTH), Kathmandu, Nepal from August 2017 to January 2018. A total of 4351 samples including urine, pus, wound swab, endotracheal tip, catheter tip, and blood were collected from the patients and processed by standard conventional microbiological methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of the isolates was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Double disc synergy test was performed on carbapenem resistant organisms to detect production of MBL and inhibitor-based test was used for the detection of ABL production. Of the 4351 samples, 421 bacterial isolates belonging to 16 different genera were recovered, of which 303 (71.97%) were Gram negative bacilli (GNB). <i>E. coli</i> (189/303) and <i>S. aureus</i> (80/118) were the most prevalent among gram negatives and gram positives, respectively. Bacterial incidence was found significantly associated with gender, specimen type, and the department where the patients were enrolled. Colistin-sulfate and polymycin-B were the most effective drug against GNB, whereas imipenem against gram positives. Prevalence of MDR and methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) was 35.15% and 60%, respectively. The prevalence of MBL and ABL-producing isolate was 11(3.6%) and 13(4.3%), respectively. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (5/11) and <i>E. coli</i> (9/13) were the major MBL and ABL producers, respectively. MBL and ABL production was found to be significantly associated with the age of the patient and the specimen type. A regular antibiotic surveillance activity with screening for MBL and ABL-producing bacterial isolates in the hospital settings to curb the incidence and transmission of such difficult-to-treat pathogens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology insights\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"11786361221150761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/3e/10.1177_11786361221150761.PMC9880579.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361221150761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786361221150761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

长期以来,碳青霉烯类药物一直是治疗耐多药(MDR)和广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生生物的首选药物。本研究旨在确定临床分离的革兰氏阴性菌中金属β -内酰胺酶(MBL)和AmpC β -内酰胺酶(ABL)的存在情况。对2017年8月至2018年1月在尼泊尔加德满都曼莫汉纪念医学院和教学医院(MMTH)就诊的患者进行了一项横断面研究。收集患者尿液、脓液、创面拭子、气管尖端、导管尖端、血液等4351份标本,采用标准的常规微生物学方法进行处理。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法对分离菌株进行药敏试验。对碳青霉烯耐药菌采用双盘协同试验检测MBL的产生,对ABL的产生采用基于抑制剂的试验检测。检出细菌421株,分属16个属,其中革兰氏阴性杆菌303株(71.97%);革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性分别以大肠杆菌(189/303)和金黄色葡萄球菌(80/118)最常见。发现细菌发病率与性别、标本类型和患者入组的科室显著相关。硫酸粘菌素和多霉素- b是对GNB最有效的药物,而亚胺培南对革兰氏阳性最有效。耐多药和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)患病率分别为35.15%和60%。产生MBL和abl的分离株分别为11株(3.6%)和13株(4.3%)。铜绿假单胞菌(5/11)和大肠杆菌(9/13)分别是主要的MBL和ABL产生菌。发现MBL和ABL的产生与患者的年龄和标本类型显著相关。定期开展抗生素监测活动,在医院环境中筛查产生MBL和abl的细菌分离株,以遏制这类难以治疗的病原体的发生和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates Among the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates Among the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates Among the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates Among the Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Over the times, carbapenems have been the choice of drug for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. The current study aimed at determining the occurrence of metallo beta-lactamase (MBL) and AmpC beta-lactamase (ABL) in gram negative bacteria isolated from clinical samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the patients visiting Manmohan Memorial Medical College and Teaching Hospital (MMTH), Kathmandu, Nepal from August 2017 to January 2018. A total of 4351 samples including urine, pus, wound swab, endotracheal tip, catheter tip, and blood were collected from the patients and processed by standard conventional microbiological methods. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of the isolates was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Double disc synergy test was performed on carbapenem resistant organisms to detect production of MBL and inhibitor-based test was used for the detection of ABL production. Of the 4351 samples, 421 bacterial isolates belonging to 16 different genera were recovered, of which 303 (71.97%) were Gram negative bacilli (GNB). E. coli (189/303) and S. aureus (80/118) were the most prevalent among gram negatives and gram positives, respectively. Bacterial incidence was found significantly associated with gender, specimen type, and the department where the patients were enrolled. Colistin-sulfate and polymycin-B were the most effective drug against GNB, whereas imipenem against gram positives. Prevalence of MDR and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was 35.15% and 60%, respectively. The prevalence of MBL and ABL-producing isolate was 11(3.6%) and 13(4.3%), respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5/11) and E. coli (9/13) were the major MBL and ABL producers, respectively. MBL and ABL production was found to be significantly associated with the age of the patient and the specimen type. A regular antibiotic surveillance activity with screening for MBL and ABL-producing bacterial isolates in the hospital settings to curb the incidence and transmission of such difficult-to-treat pathogens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信