通过确保所有有精神健康问题的患者在国民保健制度中获得研究机会,促进包容性。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Catherine Henshall, Helen Jones, Tanya Smith, Andrea Cipriani
{"title":"通过确保所有有精神健康问题的患者在国民保健制度中获得研究机会,促进包容性。","authors":"Catherine Henshall, Helen Jones, Tanya Smith, Andrea Cipriani","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchactive clinical services have lower mortality rates and produce higher quality care outcomes, however, recruiting participants to clinical research in the National Health System (NHS) remains challenging. A recent study, assessing the feasibility of clinical staff electronically documenting patient consent to discuss research participation, indicated very low patient uptake, limiting its effectiveness as a strategy for improving access to research. A followon study comparing this ‘optin’ approach with an ‘optout’ approach, whereby patients are informed about research opportunities unless they indicate otherwise, found that patients and staff favoured an ‘optout’ approach and wanted research to be more accessible. Subsequently, in August 2021, Count me In was developed and launched within Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust adult and older adult mental health services. Count Me In is an optout initiative and a 12month implementation study, aiming to promote inclusivity by enabling greater equity of information provision for marginalised groups (including Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, older adults, people with physical and mental disabilities, refugees and asylum seekers), rather than relying on clinicianled recruitment. It was developed in consultation with our Caldicott Guardian and Head of Information Governance to ensure correct handling of patient data and to differentiate the initiative from ‘national data optout’. A robust communications plan raised awareness of the initiative (https://www. oxfordhealth.nhs.uk/publication/countme-in/). Patient contact preferences and research involvement are documented on the electronic patient record. Preliminary findings illustrate that in just over 3 months, 8824 patients became contactable through Count Me In, a 400% increase on the number previously contactable through the ‘standard’ optin. Only 120 patients have opted out of contact. Of 234 potentially eligible patients contacted about specific research studies, 46 (19.6%) consented to participate. Inclusivity across age, gender, ethnicity and diagnostic group is being monitored and early evidence signals positive changes in equity of research access. For instance, the Count Me In cohort now represents patients across 62 of the 70 diagnostic groups represented in the Trust’s caseload, in comparison to only 44 groups represented using the standard ‘optin’ approach. A full evaluation at the end of the 12month implementation phase will highlight trends and changes in research activity, while also allowing for process modifications to be made before the initiative is rolled out across the country. The ultimate aim is to extend Count Me In to as many NHS Trusts as possible, embedding research within routine patient care and promoting inclusivity by ensuring that research opportunities are offered to all patients with mental health issues, regardless of diagnosis or how well known they are to clinicians.","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231587/pdf/ebmental-2021-300411.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting inclusivity by ensuring that all patients with mental health issues are offered research opportunities in the NHS.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Henshall, Helen Jones, Tanya Smith, Andrea Cipriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchactive clinical services have lower mortality rates and produce higher quality care outcomes, however, recruiting participants to clinical research in the National Health System (NHS) remains challenging. A recent study, assessing the feasibility of clinical staff electronically documenting patient consent to discuss research participation, indicated very low patient uptake, limiting its effectiveness as a strategy for improving access to research. A followon study comparing this ‘optin’ approach with an ‘optout’ approach, whereby patients are informed about research opportunities unless they indicate otherwise, found that patients and staff favoured an ‘optout’ approach and wanted research to be more accessible. Subsequently, in August 2021, Count me In was developed and launched within Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust adult and older adult mental health services. Count Me In is an optout initiative and a 12month implementation study, aiming to promote inclusivity by enabling greater equity of information provision for marginalised groups (including Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, older adults, people with physical and mental disabilities, refugees and asylum seekers), rather than relying on clinicianled recruitment. It was developed in consultation with our Caldicott Guardian and Head of Information Governance to ensure correct handling of patient data and to differentiate the initiative from ‘national data optout’. A robust communications plan raised awareness of the initiative (https://www. oxfordhealth.nhs.uk/publication/countme-in/). Patient contact preferences and research involvement are documented on the electronic patient record. Preliminary findings illustrate that in just over 3 months, 8824 patients became contactable through Count Me In, a 400% increase on the number previously contactable through the ‘standard’ optin. Only 120 patients have opted out of contact. Of 234 potentially eligible patients contacted about specific research studies, 46 (19.6%) consented to participate. Inclusivity across age, gender, ethnicity and diagnostic group is being monitored and early evidence signals positive changes in equity of research access. For instance, the Count Me In cohort now represents patients across 62 of the 70 diagnostic groups represented in the Trust’s caseload, in comparison to only 44 groups represented using the standard ‘optin’ approach. A full evaluation at the end of the 12month implementation phase will highlight trends and changes in research activity, while also allowing for process modifications to be made before the initiative is rolled out across the country. The ultimate aim is to extend Count Me In to as many NHS Trusts as possible, embedding research within routine patient care and promoting inclusivity by ensuring that research opportunities are offered to all patients with mental health issues, regardless of diagnosis or how well known they are to clinicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231587/pdf/ebmental-2021-300411.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting inclusivity by ensuring that all patients with mental health issues are offered research opportunities in the NHS.
Researchactive clinical services have lower mortality rates and produce higher quality care outcomes, however, recruiting participants to clinical research in the National Health System (NHS) remains challenging. A recent study, assessing the feasibility of clinical staff electronically documenting patient consent to discuss research participation, indicated very low patient uptake, limiting its effectiveness as a strategy for improving access to research. A followon study comparing this ‘optin’ approach with an ‘optout’ approach, whereby patients are informed about research opportunities unless they indicate otherwise, found that patients and staff favoured an ‘optout’ approach and wanted research to be more accessible. Subsequently, in August 2021, Count me In was developed and launched within Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust adult and older adult mental health services. Count Me In is an optout initiative and a 12month implementation study, aiming to promote inclusivity by enabling greater equity of information provision for marginalised groups (including Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, older adults, people with physical and mental disabilities, refugees and asylum seekers), rather than relying on clinicianled recruitment. It was developed in consultation with our Caldicott Guardian and Head of Information Governance to ensure correct handling of patient data and to differentiate the initiative from ‘national data optout’. A robust communications plan raised awareness of the initiative (https://www. oxfordhealth.nhs.uk/publication/countme-in/). Patient contact preferences and research involvement are documented on the electronic patient record. Preliminary findings illustrate that in just over 3 months, 8824 patients became contactable through Count Me In, a 400% increase on the number previously contactable through the ‘standard’ optin. Only 120 patients have opted out of contact. Of 234 potentially eligible patients contacted about specific research studies, 46 (19.6%) consented to participate. Inclusivity across age, gender, ethnicity and diagnostic group is being monitored and early evidence signals positive changes in equity of research access. For instance, the Count Me In cohort now represents patients across 62 of the 70 diagnostic groups represented in the Trust’s caseload, in comparison to only 44 groups represented using the standard ‘optin’ approach. A full evaluation at the end of the 12month implementation phase will highlight trends and changes in research activity, while also allowing for process modifications to be made before the initiative is rolled out across the country. The ultimate aim is to extend Count Me In to as many NHS Trusts as possible, embedding research within routine patient care and promoting inclusivity by ensuring that research opportunities are offered to all patients with mental health issues, regardless of diagnosis or how well known they are to clinicians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信