早期转移性结直肠癌的生存结果:多中心配对分析

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1159/000533429
Bernhard Doleschal, Dora Niedersüß-Beke, Patrick Kirchweger, Andreas Petzer, Josef Thaler, Holger Rumpold
{"title":"早期转移性结直肠癌的生存结果:多中心配对分析","authors":"Bernhard Doleschal, Dora Niedersüß-Beke, Patrick Kirchweger, Andreas Petzer, Josef Thaler, Holger Rumpold","doi":"10.1159/000533429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Survival of patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has increased over the last decades. These benefits appear to be restricted to patients aged 50 and above. However, among the population aged &lt;50, colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are significantly rising. The clinical benefit of treatment in this population still is a matter of debate. We aim to compare the clinical outcome between patients aged 50 and younger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed data from 1,077 patients treated for mCRC at three cancer centers in Austria from January 2005 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: &lt;50 years (eo-CRC) and &gt;50 years (regular-onset CRC, ro-CRC). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential biases, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in tumor characteristics between eo-CRC and ro-CRC in the overall population were primarily related to tumor sidedness and disease-free survival following intended curative resection. Our data show that eo-CRC patients underwent metastases resection more often and received significantly more lines of treatment in the palliative setting. Overall survival was superior in eo-CRC compared to ro-CRC, even after adjusting for sidedness, timing of metastases, sex, number of treatment lines, and resection of metastases by propensity scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that younger patients benefit at least to the same magnitude or even more from mCRC-treatment than patients aged 50 or above.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Outcome in Early-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter-Matched Pair Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bernhard Doleschal, Dora Niedersüß-Beke, Patrick Kirchweger, Andreas Petzer, Josef Thaler, Holger Rumpold\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Survival of patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has increased over the last decades. These benefits appear to be restricted to patients aged 50 and above. However, among the population aged &lt;50, colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are significantly rising. The clinical benefit of treatment in this population still is a matter of debate. We aim to compare the clinical outcome between patients aged 50 and younger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed data from 1,077 patients treated for mCRC at three cancer centers in Austria from January 2005 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: &lt;50 years (eo-CRC) and &gt;50 years (regular-onset CRC, ro-CRC). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential biases, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in tumor characteristics between eo-CRC and ro-CRC in the overall population were primarily related to tumor sidedness and disease-free survival following intended curative resection. Our data show that eo-CRC patients underwent metastases resection more often and received significantly more lines of treatment in the palliative setting. Overall survival was superior in eo-CRC compared to ro-CRC, even after adjusting for sidedness, timing of metastases, sex, number of treatment lines, and resection of metastases by propensity scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that younger patients benefit at least to the same magnitude or even more from mCRC-treatment than patients aged 50 or above.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介过去几十年来,转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的生存率有所提高。这些益处似乎仅限于 50 岁及以上的患者。然而,在 50 岁的人群中,结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率都在显著上升。在这一人群中,治疗的临床益处仍存在争议。我们旨在比较 50 岁及以下患者的临床疗效:在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了 2005 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在奥地利三家癌症中心接受治疗的 1077 名 mCRC 患者的数据。根据诊断时的年龄将患者分为两组:<50 岁(eo-CRC)和>50 岁(常规发病的 CRC,ro-CRC)。采用倾向评分匹配法控制潜在偏差,并比较两组患者的生存结果:结果:在总体人群中,eo-CRC 和 ro-CRC 肿瘤特征的差异主要与肿瘤的偏侧性和预定的根治性切除术后的无病生存期有关。我们的数据显示,eo-CRC 患者接受转移灶切除术的频率更高,接受姑息治疗的次数也明显更多。即使通过倾向评分调整了偏侧、转移时间、性别、治疗次数和转移灶切除情况,eo-CRC 的总生存率仍优于ro-CRC:我们的研究表明,与 50 岁或以上的患者相比,年轻患者从 mCRC 治疗中获益的程度至少相同,甚至更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival Outcome in Early-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter-Matched Pair Analysis.

Introduction: Survival of patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has increased over the last decades. These benefits appear to be restricted to patients aged 50 and above. However, among the population aged <50, colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are significantly rising. The clinical benefit of treatment in this population still is a matter of debate. We aim to compare the clinical outcome between patients aged 50 and younger.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed data from 1,077 patients treated for mCRC at three cancer centers in Austria from January 2005 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: <50 years (eo-CRC) and >50 years (regular-onset CRC, ro-CRC). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential biases, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: The differences in tumor characteristics between eo-CRC and ro-CRC in the overall population were primarily related to tumor sidedness and disease-free survival following intended curative resection. Our data show that eo-CRC patients underwent metastases resection more often and received significantly more lines of treatment in the palliative setting. Overall survival was superior in eo-CRC compared to ro-CRC, even after adjusting for sidedness, timing of metastases, sex, number of treatment lines, and resection of metastases by propensity scoring.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that younger patients benefit at least to the same magnitude or even more from mCRC-treatment than patients aged 50 or above.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信