筛查功能性颌骨障碍与患者报告的颌骨限制和口腔行为的结果之间的关系

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A LÖVGREN , A ILGUNAS , B HÄGGMAN-HENRIKSON , B ELIAS , O AL ROUDINi , C. M VISSCHER , F LOBBEZOO , A WÄNMAN , P LIV
{"title":"筛查功能性颌骨障碍与患者报告的颌骨限制和口腔行为的结果之间的关系","authors":"A LÖVGREN ,&nbsp;A ILGUNAS ,&nbsp;B HÄGGMAN-HENRIKSON ,&nbsp;B ELIAS ,&nbsp;O AL ROUDINi ,&nbsp;C. M VISSCHER ,&nbsp;F LOBBEZOO ,&nbsp;A WÄNMAN ,&nbsp;P LIV","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is a collective term for pain and functional disturbances related to the jaw muscles and the temporomandibular joint<span>. In contrast to screening for orofacial pain, knowledge is limited on the association between patient-reported outcomes and screening for joint-related functional jaw disturbances. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the association between a screening question for functional jaw disturbances, and disease-specific outcome measures for functional jaw limitations and oral behaviors.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included 299 individuals (201 women; 20-69 years, median 37.0) in a general population sample from Västerbotten, Northern Sweden in 2014. A single screening question for functional jaw disturbances “Does your jaw lock or become stuck once a week or more?” was used to categorize individuals as cases or controls. Patient-reported outcomes on functional jaw disturbances were assessed with the 20-item jaw functional limitation scale (JFLS-20) and oral behaviors with the 21-item Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC-21).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The strongest predictive probability to have a positive screening outcome was functional jaw limitations related to mobility (AUC<sub>boot</sub>=0.78, 95 CI:0.71-0.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), followed by limitations related to communication (AUC<sub>boot</sub> = 0.74, 95 CI:0.63-0.80, <em>P</em><span> &lt; .001) and mastication (AUC</span><sub>boot</sub> = 0.73, 95 CI:0.66-0.81, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The frequency of oral behaviors was not significantly associated with a positive screening outcome (AUC<sub>boot</sub> = 0.65, 95 CI:0.55-0.72, <em>P</em> = .223).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported functional limitations, but not oral behaviors, are strongly associated with a single screening question for frequent functional jaw disturbances. This finding provides support for incorporating a question on jaw catching/locking once a week or more in screening instruments for TMDs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SCREENING FOR FUNCTIONAL JAW DISTURBANCES AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES ON JAW LIMITATIONS AND ORAL BEHAVIORS\",\"authors\":\"A LÖVGREN ,&nbsp;A ILGUNAS ,&nbsp;B HÄGGMAN-HENRIKSON ,&nbsp;B ELIAS ,&nbsp;O AL ROUDINi ,&nbsp;C. M VISSCHER ,&nbsp;F LOBBEZOO ,&nbsp;A WÄNMAN ,&nbsp;P LIV\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is a collective term for pain and functional disturbances related to the jaw muscles and the temporomandibular joint<span>. In contrast to screening for orofacial pain, knowledge is limited on the association between patient-reported outcomes and screening for joint-related functional jaw disturbances. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the association between a screening question for functional jaw disturbances, and disease-specific outcome measures for functional jaw limitations and oral behaviors.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included 299 individuals (201 women; 20-69 years, median 37.0) in a general population sample from Västerbotten, Northern Sweden in 2014. A single screening question for functional jaw disturbances “Does your jaw lock or become stuck once a week or more?” was used to categorize individuals as cases or controls. Patient-reported outcomes on functional jaw disturbances were assessed with the 20-item jaw functional limitation scale (JFLS-20) and oral behaviors with the 21-item Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC-21).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The strongest predictive probability to have a positive screening outcome was functional jaw limitations related to mobility (AUC<sub>boot</sub>=0.78, 95 CI:0.71-0.86, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), followed by limitations related to communication (AUC<sub>boot</sub> = 0.74, 95 CI:0.63-0.80, <em>P</em><span> &lt; .001) and mastication (AUC</span><sub>boot</sub> = 0.73, 95 CI:0.66-0.81, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The frequency of oral behaviors was not significantly associated with a positive screening outcome (AUC<sub>boot</sub> = 0.65, 95 CI:0.55-0.72, <em>P</em> = .223).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported functional limitations, but not oral behaviors, are strongly associated with a single screening question for frequent functional jaw disturbances. This finding provides support for incorporating a question on jaw catching/locking once a week or more in screening instruments for TMDs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223000738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223000738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的颞下颌关节疾病(TMDs)是与颌骨肌肉和颞下颌关节有关的疼痛和功能障碍的总称。与筛查口面部疼痛相比,对患者报告的结果与筛查关节相关的功能性颌骨障碍之间的关系了解有限。因此,我们的目的是评估功能性颌骨障碍的筛查问题与功能性颌骨限制和口腔行为的疾病特异性结果测量之间的关系。方法本研究纳入299例个体(女性201例;20-69岁,中位数37.0),来自2014年瑞典北部Västerbotten的一般人群样本。功能性颌骨障碍的一个筛查问题是:“你的下巴是否每周锁住或卡住一次或更多?”用于将个体划分为病例或对照。采用20项颌骨功能限制量表(JFLS-20)和21项口腔行为检查表(OBC-21)对患者报告的功能性颌骨障碍结果进行评估。结果筛查结果阳性的最强预测概率是与活动能力相关的功能性颌骨限制(AUCboot=0.78, 95 CI:0.71-0.86, P <.001),其次是与沟通相关的限制(AUCboot = 0.74,95 CI:0.63-0.80, P <.001)和咀嚼(AUCboot = 0.73,95 CI:0.66-0.81, P <措施)。口腔行为频率与筛查阳性结果无显著相关性(AUCboot = 0.65,95 CI:0.55-0.72, P = .223)。结论自我报告的功能限制,而不是口腔行为,与频繁功能性颌骨障碍的单一筛查问题密切相关。这一发现为每周或更多次在tmd筛查仪器中纳入颌骨捕获/锁定问题提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SCREENING FOR FUNCTIONAL JAW DISTURBANCES AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES ON JAW LIMITATIONS AND ORAL BEHAVIORS

Objectives

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is a collective term for pain and functional disturbances related to the jaw muscles and the temporomandibular joint. In contrast to screening for orofacial pain, knowledge is limited on the association between patient-reported outcomes and screening for joint-related functional jaw disturbances. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the association between a screening question for functional jaw disturbances, and disease-specific outcome measures for functional jaw limitations and oral behaviors.

Methods

This study included 299 individuals (201 women; 20-69 years, median 37.0) in a general population sample from Västerbotten, Northern Sweden in 2014. A single screening question for functional jaw disturbances “Does your jaw lock or become stuck once a week or more?” was used to categorize individuals as cases or controls. Patient-reported outcomes on functional jaw disturbances were assessed with the 20-item jaw functional limitation scale (JFLS-20) and oral behaviors with the 21-item Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC-21).

Results

The strongest predictive probability to have a positive screening outcome was functional jaw limitations related to mobility (AUCboot=0.78, 95 CI:0.71-0.86, P < .001), followed by limitations related to communication (AUCboot = 0.74, 95 CI:0.63-0.80, P < .001) and mastication (AUCboot = 0.73, 95 CI:0.66-0.81, P < .001). The frequency of oral behaviors was not significantly associated with a positive screening outcome (AUCboot = 0.65, 95 CI:0.55-0.72, P = .223).

Conclusions

Self-reported functional limitations, but not oral behaviors, are strongly associated with a single screening question for frequent functional jaw disturbances. This finding provides support for incorporating a question on jaw catching/locking once a week or more in screening instruments for TMDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信