Francesco Gavazzi, Allan M Glanzman, Sarah Woidill, Brielle Formanowski, Agrani Dixit, David Isaacs, Tracy Kornafel, Elizabeth Ballance, Samuel R Pierce, Nicholson Modesti, Isabella Barcelos, Stacy V Cusack, Amanda K Jan, Zaida Flores, Omar Sherbini, Ariel Vincent, Russell D'Aiello, Scott A Lorch, Sara B DeMauro, Abbas Jawad, Adeline Vanderver, Laura Adang
{"title":"Aicardi-Goutières综合征毛运动功能的探讨。","authors":"Francesco Gavazzi, Allan M Glanzman, Sarah Woidill, Brielle Formanowski, Agrani Dixit, David Isaacs, Tracy Kornafel, Elizabeth Ballance, Samuel R Pierce, Nicholson Modesti, Isabella Barcelos, Stacy V Cusack, Amanda K Jan, Zaida Flores, Omar Sherbini, Ariel Vincent, Russell D'Aiello, Scott A Lorch, Sara B DeMauro, Abbas Jawad, Adeline Vanderver, Laura Adang","doi":"10.1177/08830738231188753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a spectrum of motor abilities. While the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome severity score favors severely impacted individuals, there is an unmet need to define tools measuring function across the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome spectrum as potential outcome assessments for future clinical trials. <b>Methods:</b> Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and AGS Severity Scale were administered in individuals affected by Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (n = 71). We characterized the performance variability by genotype. Derived versions of the GMFM-88, including the GMFM-66, GMFM-66 item set (GMFM-66IS), and GMFM-66 Basal&Ceiling (GMFM-66BC) were calculated. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohort was divided into severe (AGS Severity Scale score <4) or attenuated (≥4). Performance on the AGS Severity Scale highly correlated with total GMFM-88 scores (Spearman Correlation: R = 0.91). To assess variability of the GMFM-88 within genotypic subcohorts, interquartile ranges (IQRs) were compared. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> GMFM-88 performance in the <i>TREX1</i> cohort had least variability while the <i>SAMHD1</i> cohort had the largest IQR (4.23 vs 81.8). Floor effect was prominent, with most evaluations scoring below 20% (n = 46, 64.79%), particularly in <i>TREX1</i>- and <i>RNASEH2-</i>cohorts. Performance by the GMFM-66, GMFM-66IS, and GMFM-66BC highly correlated with the full GMFM-88. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population represents a broad range of gross motor skills. <b>Conclusions:</b> This work identified the GMFM-88 as a potential clinical outcome assessment in subsets of the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population but underscores the need for additional validation of outcome measures reflective of the diverse gross motor function observed in this population, including low motor function. When time is limited by resources or patient endurance, shorter versions of the GMFM-88 may be a reasonable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":15319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"38 8-9","pages":"518-527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530058/pdf/nihms-1914738.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Gross Motor Function in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Gavazzi, Allan M Glanzman, Sarah Woidill, Brielle Formanowski, Agrani Dixit, David Isaacs, Tracy Kornafel, Elizabeth Ballance, Samuel R Pierce, Nicholson Modesti, Isabella Barcelos, Stacy V Cusack, Amanda K Jan, Zaida Flores, Omar Sherbini, Ariel Vincent, Russell D'Aiello, Scott A Lorch, Sara B DeMauro, Abbas Jawad, Adeline Vanderver, Laura Adang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08830738231188753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a spectrum of motor abilities. While the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome severity score favors severely impacted individuals, there is an unmet need to define tools measuring function across the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome spectrum as potential outcome assessments for future clinical trials. <b>Methods:</b> Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and AGS Severity Scale were administered in individuals affected by Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (n = 71). We characterized the performance variability by genotype. Derived versions of the GMFM-88, including the GMFM-66, GMFM-66 item set (GMFM-66IS), and GMFM-66 Basal&Ceiling (GMFM-66BC) were calculated. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohort was divided into severe (AGS Severity Scale score <4) or attenuated (≥4). Performance on the AGS Severity Scale highly correlated with total GMFM-88 scores (Spearman Correlation: R = 0.91). To assess variability of the GMFM-88 within genotypic subcohorts, interquartile ranges (IQRs) were compared. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> GMFM-88 performance in the <i>TREX1</i> cohort had least variability while the <i>SAMHD1</i> cohort had the largest IQR (4.23 vs 81.8). Floor effect was prominent, with most evaluations scoring below 20% (n = 46, 64.79%), particularly in <i>TREX1</i>- and <i>RNASEH2-</i>cohorts. Performance by the GMFM-66, GMFM-66IS, and GMFM-66BC highly correlated with the full GMFM-88. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population represents a broad range of gross motor skills. <b>Conclusions:</b> This work identified the GMFM-88 as a potential clinical outcome assessment in subsets of the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population but underscores the need for additional validation of outcome measures reflective of the diverse gross motor function observed in this population, including low motor function. When time is limited by resources or patient endurance, shorter versions of the GMFM-88 may be a reasonable alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\"38 8-9\",\"pages\":\"518-527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10530058/pdf/nihms-1914738.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738231188753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738231188753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Aicardi-Goutières综合征(AGS)是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,以一系列运动能力为特征。虽然Aicardi-Goutières综合征严重程度评分有利于严重受影响的个体,但仍有未满足的需求,即定义衡量Aicardi-古蒂埃综合征谱功能的工具,作为未来临床试验的潜在结果评估。方法:对Aicardi-Goutières综合征(n = 71)。我们通过基因型来表征表现的变异性。计算了GMFM-88的衍生版本,包括GMFM-66、GMFM-66-项目集(GMFM-66IS)和GMFM-66-Basel&Ceiling(GMFM66BC)。Aicardi-Goutières综合征队列被分为严重(AGS严重程度量表评分结果:TREX1队列的GMFM-88表现变异性最小,而SAMHD1队列的IQR最大(4.23 vs 81.8) = 46.64.79%),特别是在TREX1-和RNASEH2队列中。GMFM-66、GMFM-66IS和GMFM-66BC的性能与完整的GMFM-88高度相关。Aicardi-Goutières综合征人群代表了广泛的毛运动技能。结论:这项工作将GMFM-88确定为Aicardi-Goutières综合征人群亚群的潜在临床结果评估,但强调需要对反映该人群中观察到的不同总运动功能(包括低运动功能)的结果指标进行额外验证。当时间受到资源或患者耐力的限制时,较短版本的GMFM-88可能是一个合理的选择。
Exploration of Gross Motor Function in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.
Background: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a spectrum of motor abilities. While the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome severity score favors severely impacted individuals, there is an unmet need to define tools measuring function across the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome spectrum as potential outcome assessments for future clinical trials. Methods: Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and AGS Severity Scale were administered in individuals affected by Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (n = 71). We characterized the performance variability by genotype. Derived versions of the GMFM-88, including the GMFM-66, GMFM-66 item set (GMFM-66IS), and GMFM-66 Basal&Ceiling (GMFM-66BC) were calculated. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohort was divided into severe (AGS Severity Scale score <4) or attenuated (≥4). Performance on the AGS Severity Scale highly correlated with total GMFM-88 scores (Spearman Correlation: R = 0.91). To assess variability of the GMFM-88 within genotypic subcohorts, interquartile ranges (IQRs) were compared. Results: GMFM-88 performance in the TREX1 cohort had least variability while the SAMHD1 cohort had the largest IQR (4.23 vs 81.8). Floor effect was prominent, with most evaluations scoring below 20% (n = 46, 64.79%), particularly in TREX1- and RNASEH2-cohorts. Performance by the GMFM-66, GMFM-66IS, and GMFM-66BC highly correlated with the full GMFM-88. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population represents a broad range of gross motor skills. Conclusions: This work identified the GMFM-88 as a potential clinical outcome assessment in subsets of the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population but underscores the need for additional validation of outcome measures reflective of the diverse gross motor function observed in this population, including low motor function. When time is limited by resources or patient endurance, shorter versions of the GMFM-88 may be a reasonable alternative.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Child Neurology (JCN) embraces peer-reviewed clinical and investigative studies from a wide-variety of neuroscience disciplines. Focusing on the needs of neurologic patients from birth to age 18 years, JCN covers topics ranging from assessment of new and changing therapies and procedures; diagnosis, evaluation, and management of neurologic, neuropsychiatric, and neurodevelopmental disorders; and pathophysiology of central nervous system diseases.