奈比洛尔和小剂量螺内酯对顽固性高血压患者的降压疗效。

IF 0.9 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Ender Özal, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Yalçın Avcı, Ali Rıza Demir, İsmail Bıyık
{"title":"奈比洛尔和小剂量螺内酯对顽固性高血压患者的降压疗效。","authors":"Hamdi Püşüroğlu,&nbsp;Ender Özal,&nbsp;Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici,&nbsp;Yalçın Avcı,&nbsp;Ali Rıza Demir,&nbsp;İsmail Bıyık","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2023.60464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Resistant hypertension is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The optimal medical therapy is not fully elucidated in resistant hypertension. There are relatively few studies in the literature on the treatment of resistant hypertension. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of nebivolol 5 mg, a third generation beta-blocker, with spironolactone 25 mg in patients with resistant hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients with resistant hypertension were included in the study. The spironolactone group was composed of 38 patients while the nebivolol group was composed of 43 patients. Resistant hypertension was defined as having office blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg while the patients were under 3 or more antihypertensive agents treatment which included diuretic agents. Office and ambulatory blood pressure at basal and after 8 weeks of treatment were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Office systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in 24-hour ambulatory blood  pressure monitoring were significantly lower when compared to basal values in both nebivolol and spironolactone groups. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in nebivolol group was 14.9 ± 19.8 mmHg and 9.3 ± 12.7 mmHg compared to 19.5 ± 16.4 mmHg and 13.7 ± 10.8 mmHg in the spironolactone group, respectively. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significantly different between the nebivolol and spironolactone groups (P = 0.338 and P = 0.153).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nebivolol is an effective treatment option for resistant hypertension and the antihypertensive effect of nebivolol is similar to low-dose spironolactone.</p>","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antihypertensive Efficacy Of Nebivolol And Low Dose Spironolactone In Patients With Resistant Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Hamdi Püşüroğlu,&nbsp;Ender Özal,&nbsp;Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici,&nbsp;Yalçın Avcı,&nbsp;Ali Rıza Demir,&nbsp;İsmail Bıyık\",\"doi\":\"10.5543/tkda.2023.60464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Resistant hypertension is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The optimal medical therapy is not fully elucidated in resistant hypertension. There are relatively few studies in the literature on the treatment of resistant hypertension. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of nebivolol 5 mg, a third generation beta-blocker, with spironolactone 25 mg in patients with resistant hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 81 patients with resistant hypertension were included in the study. The spironolactone group was composed of 38 patients while the nebivolol group was composed of 43 patients. Resistant hypertension was defined as having office blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg while the patients were under 3 or more antihypertensive agents treatment which included diuretic agents. Office and ambulatory blood pressure at basal and after 8 weeks of treatment were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Office systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in 24-hour ambulatory blood  pressure monitoring were significantly lower when compared to basal values in both nebivolol and spironolactone groups. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in nebivolol group was 14.9 ± 19.8 mmHg and 9.3 ± 12.7 mmHg compared to 19.5 ± 16.4 mmHg and 13.7 ± 10.8 mmHg in the spironolactone group, respectively. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significantly different between the nebivolol and spironolactone groups (P = 0.338 and P = 0.153).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nebivolol is an effective treatment option for resistant hypertension and the antihypertensive effect of nebivolol is similar to low-dose spironolactone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2023.60464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2023.60464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:顽固性高血压与死亡率和发病率的增加有关。抗药性高血压的最佳药物治疗尚未完全阐明。文献中关于顽固性高血压治疗的研究相对较少。在这项研究中,我们比较了第三代β受体阻滞剂奈比洛尔5 mg与螺内酯25 mg对顽固性高血压患者的疗效。方法:本研究共纳入81例顽固性高血压患者。螺内酯组由38名患者组成,奈比洛尔组由43名患者组成。顽固性高血压被定义为有效血压≥140/90 mmHg,而患者正在接受3种或3种以上降压药治疗,其中包括利尿剂。记录基础治疗和治疗8周后的有效性和动态血压。结果:与奈比洛尔和螺内酯组的基础值相比,24小时动态血压监测中的有效收缩压和舒张压显著降低。奈比洛尔组24小时平均收缩压和舒张压分别下降14.9±19.8 mmHg和9.3±12.7 mmHg,而螺内酯组分别下降19.5±16.4 mmHg和13.7±10.8 mmHg。奈比洛尔和螺内酯组24小时平均收缩压和舒张压的下降没有显著差异(P=0.338和P=0.153)。结论:奈比洛尔是治疗顽固性高血压的有效选择,奈比洛尔的降压效果与低剂量螺内酯相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antihypertensive Efficacy Of Nebivolol And Low Dose Spironolactone In Patients With Resistant Hypertension.

Objective: Resistant hypertension is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The optimal medical therapy is not fully elucidated in resistant hypertension. There are relatively few studies in the literature on the treatment of resistant hypertension. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of nebivolol 5 mg, a third generation beta-blocker, with spironolactone 25 mg in patients with resistant hypertension.

Methods: A total of 81 patients with resistant hypertension were included in the study. The spironolactone group was composed of 38 patients while the nebivolol group was composed of 43 patients. Resistant hypertension was defined as having office blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg while the patients were under 3 or more antihypertensive agents treatment which included diuretic agents. Office and ambulatory blood pressure at basal and after 8 weeks of treatment were recorded.

Results: Office systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in 24-hour ambulatory blood  pressure monitoring were significantly lower when compared to basal values in both nebivolol and spironolactone groups. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure in nebivolol group was 14.9 ± 19.8 mmHg and 9.3 ± 12.7 mmHg compared to 19.5 ± 16.4 mmHg and 13.7 ± 10.8 mmHg in the spironolactone group, respectively. The decrease in 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significantly different between the nebivolol and spironolactone groups (P = 0.338 and P = 0.153).

Conclusion: Nebivolol is an effective treatment option for resistant hypertension and the antihypertensive effect of nebivolol is similar to low-dose spironolactone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信