自然疗法和公共卫生:疾病叙事,医疗功效,和存在的痛苦。

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Joseph S Alter
{"title":"自然疗法和公共卫生:疾病叙事,医疗功效,和存在的痛苦。","authors":"Joseph S Alter","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2022.2106412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nature cure is a globalized system of nineteenth century European medicine that developed synergistically in opposition to biomedicine, and that has become popular in India. This essay examines the question of how anthropologists should understand claims that all diseases can be cured with earth, air, sunlight, water and raw food. The question is complicated by a paradox of relativism deeply embedded in the desire to find cures, to articulate those cures as panaceas, and to the way illness narratives personalize and essentialize contexts of meaning that resolve sickness and suffering with experiential healing. Focused on suffering that motivates people to experiment on themselves and engage in exotic cures, this essay presents an argument for extending skepticism concerning claims of efficacy to a politics of medicine and public health that is ecological rather than phenomenological, medical or biological. Suffering, as well as empathy for those who suffer, transforms radically relativized personal convictions into forms of embodied, existential activism that relate to, but extend beyond, the hegemony of biomedicine and institutionalized public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"29 4","pages":"399-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature cure and public health: illness narratives, medical efficacy, and existential suffering.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph S Alter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13648470.2022.2106412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nature cure is a globalized system of nineteenth century European medicine that developed synergistically in opposition to biomedicine, and that has become popular in India. This essay examines the question of how anthropologists should understand claims that all diseases can be cured with earth, air, sunlight, water and raw food. The question is complicated by a paradox of relativism deeply embedded in the desire to find cures, to articulate those cures as panaceas, and to the way illness narratives personalize and essentialize contexts of meaning that resolve sickness and suffering with experiential healing. Focused on suffering that motivates people to experiment on themselves and engage in exotic cures, this essay presents an argument for extending skepticism concerning claims of efficacy to a politics of medicine and public health that is ecological rather than phenomenological, medical or biological. Suffering, as well as empathy for those who suffer, transforms radically relativized personal convictions into forms of embodied, existential activism that relate to, but extend beyond, the hegemony of biomedicine and institutionalized public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"399-413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2106412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2106412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然疗法是19世纪欧洲医学的一种全球化体系,它在与生物医学的对抗中协同发展,并在印度流行起来。这篇文章探讨了人类学家应该如何理解所有疾病都可以用泥土、空气、阳光、水和生食来治愈的说法。这个问题被一种相对主义的悖论所复杂化,这种悖论深深嵌入到寻找治疗方法的愿望中,将这些治疗方法阐明为灵丹妙药,以及疾病叙事个人化和本质化的方式,即通过经验治疗来解决疾病和痛苦。这篇文章关注的是促使人们在自己身上做实验并参与奇异疗法的痛苦,它提出了一个论点,将对功效声称的怀疑延伸到医学和公共卫生的政治,而不是现象学、医学或生物学。痛苦,以及对那些受苦者的同情,从根本上将相对化的个人信念转化为具体化的、存在主义的行动主义,这种行动主义与生物医学和制度化的公共卫生的霸权有关,但又超出了这种霸权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature cure and public health: illness narratives, medical efficacy, and existential suffering.

Nature cure is a globalized system of nineteenth century European medicine that developed synergistically in opposition to biomedicine, and that has become popular in India. This essay examines the question of how anthropologists should understand claims that all diseases can be cured with earth, air, sunlight, water and raw food. The question is complicated by a paradox of relativism deeply embedded in the desire to find cures, to articulate those cures as panaceas, and to the way illness narratives personalize and essentialize contexts of meaning that resolve sickness and suffering with experiential healing. Focused on suffering that motivates people to experiment on themselves and engage in exotic cures, this essay presents an argument for extending skepticism concerning claims of efficacy to a politics of medicine and public health that is ecological rather than phenomenological, medical or biological. Suffering, as well as empathy for those who suffer, transforms radically relativized personal convictions into forms of embodied, existential activism that relate to, but extend beyond, the hegemony of biomedicine and institutionalized public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信