自身免疫性脑炎的抗惊厥治疗:系统性文献综述。

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10354-022-00998-z
Judith N Wagner
{"title":"自身免疫性脑炎的抗惊厥治疗:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Judith N Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s10354-022-00998-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23882,"journal":{"name":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticonvulsive treatment in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Judith N Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10354-022-00998-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-022-00998-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-022-00998-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癫痫发作是自身免疫性脑炎(AIE)的常见表现:癫痫发作是自身免疫性脑炎(AIE)的常见表现。免疫抑制(IT)是一种有效的治疗方法,尤其适用于伴有针对细胞外结构抗体的自身免疫性脑炎。抗癫痫药物(ASM)的作用尚不明确。然而,抗癫痫药物可能对IT难治性疾病或AIE后慢性癫痫有益:我们对 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统性回顾,以确定所有关于 AIE 引起的癫痫发作患者使用 ASM 的报告,并根据系统性回顾和 Meta 分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准进行报告。我们纳入了病例系列(至少 3 名符合条件的患者)、回顾性和前瞻性观察研究以及随机对照试验。评估的主要结果是 ASM 的疗效。次要结果包括 ASM 的数量、类型和不良反应。研究采用了描述性统计方法。根据循证医学中心(Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine)对证据水平进行评估:我们共筛选了 3371 项研究,并纳入了 30 项(7 项前瞻性研究,23 项回顾性研究)。这些报告共涉及708名患者,其中大多数(72.5%)患者患有针对细胞外结构的AIE抗体。AIE类型、发作频率、所用ASM的数量和类型各不相同。虽然大多数患者从IT和/或ASM中获益,但ASM的效果却很少能被分离出来。九项研究报告了接受 ASM 单一疗法的患者,或在开始使用 IT 之前或 IT 治疗失败后使用 ASM 相当长一段时间的患者。一项研究报告称,癫痫发作自由度与钠通道抑制剂的使用之间存在显著关联。然而,证据水平普遍较低:关于 ASM 对自身免疫性癫痫发作的特殊疗效,几乎没有可靠的数据。虽然这些患者似乎普遍对 ASM 或手术干预反应较差,但与其他药物相比,钠通道阻滞剂可能具有额外的益处。然而,证据水平较低,早期 IT 仍是 AIE 治疗的主流。未来的试验应解决AIE中ASM的最佳选择和剂量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticonvulsive treatment in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic literature review.

Background: Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

Results: We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.

Conclusion: Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: ''From the microscope to clinical application!'', Scientists from all European countries make available their recent research results and practical experience through Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, the renowned English- and German-language forum. Both original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of clinical and preclinical medicine are presented within the successful framework of thematic issues compiled by guest editors. Selected cutting-edge topics, such as dementia, geriatric oncology, Helicobacter pylori and phytomedicine make the journal a mandatory source of information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信