寻求性别肯定医疗保健的性别不符合和非二元个体的健康保险政策包容性审查。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Transgender Health Pub Date : 2022-11-29 eCollection Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2020.0146
Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza
{"title":"寻求性别肯定医疗保健的性别不符合和非二元个体的健康保险政策包容性审查。","authors":"Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2020.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (<i>n</i>=4) and private (<i>n</i>=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":"7 6","pages":"484-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829125/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Health Insurance Policy Inclusivity of Gender Nonconforming and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Gender-Affirming Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/trgh.2020.0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (<i>n</i>=4) and private (<i>n</i>=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transgender Health\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"484-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transgender Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:越来越多的人向卫生保健专业人员提出了跨性别,性别不符合(GNC)和性别非二元(NB)。GNC/NB个人在卫生保健环境中受到歧视的比率高于他们的二元性别(例如,跨性别男性和跨性别女性)。过时的语言排除了性别认同的细微差别。本研究的目的是评估健康保险政策中的现行术语是否可能成为GNC/NB个人性别肯定医疗保健的障碍。方法:于2020年5月获得不同子集的政府(n=4)和私人(n=6)支付者的健康保险政策。研究小组的两名成员独立审查了政策,以确定每项政策对GNC/NB个人是支持还是不支持。设计了一个任意的评分系统,允许审查者根据提及、覆盖率和包容性的总和为每个策略分配特定的分数。结果:大多数政策表现不佳,支持率低于零。还注意到,大多数政策使用二元、性别语言和术语,排除了许多GNC/NB个人的独特性别身份。结论:目前大多数政策未能为GNC/NB个人提供明确、包容的护理相关和重要方面的覆盖。在目前的状态下,这些政策给这些人带来了困惑、不确定性和沮丧,这可能成为获得高质量、包容性和性别肯定的卫生保健的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Health Insurance Policy Inclusivity of Gender Nonconforming and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Gender-Affirming Health Care.

Background: An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.

Methods: Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (n=4) and private (n=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.

Results: Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.

Conclusions: Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transgender Health
Transgender Health Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
122
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信