Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza
{"title":"寻求性别肯定医疗保健的性别不符合和非二元个体的健康保险政策包容性审查。","authors":"Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2020.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (<i>n</i>=4) and private (<i>n</i>=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":"7 6","pages":"484-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829125/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Health Insurance Policy Inclusivity of Gender Nonconforming and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Gender-Affirming Health Care.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M Bond, Tom Fouche, Jesse R Smith, Rebecca M Garza\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/trgh.2020.0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (<i>n</i>=4) and private (<i>n</i>=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transgender Health\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"484-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transgender Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of Health Insurance Policy Inclusivity of Gender Nonconforming and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Gender-Affirming Health Care.
Background: An increasing number of individuals who present to health care professionals identify as transgender, gender nonconforming (GNC), and gender nonbinary (NB). GNC/NB individuals experience higher rates of discrimination in health care settings compared with their binary (e.g., trans male and trans female) counterparts. Outdated language excludes the nuances of gender identity. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether current terminology found in health insurance policies may be a barrier to gender-affirming health care for GNC/NB individuals.
Methods: Health insurance policies for a diverse subset of government (n=4) and private (n=6) payers were obtained in May 2020. Policies were reviewed independently by two members of the research team to determine whether each was supportive or unsupportive to GNC/NB individuals. An arbitrary scoring system was designed that allowed the reviewers to assign a specific number of points to each policy based on the aggregation of mention, coverage, and inclusivity.
Results: Most policies performed poorly as indicated by a support score less than zero. It was also noted that most policies used binary, gendered language, and terminology that excludes the unique gender identities of many GNC/NB individuals.
Conclusions: Most policies currently failed to provide clear, inclusive coverage to GNC/NB individuals for relevant and important aspects of their care. In their current state, these policies are a source of confusion, uncertainty, and discouragement for these individuals, which can present as a barrier to accessing quality, inclusive, gender-affirming health care.