应用英国田径运动肌肉损伤分类法后与活动相关的下肢肌肉撕裂的结果:系统回顾。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
William L Hollabaugh, Alexander Sin, Rachel Lane Walden, Jennifer S Weaver, Lauren P Porras, Lance E LeClere, Ashley R Karpinos, Rogelio A Coronado, Andrew J Gregory, Jaron P Sullivan
{"title":"应用英国田径运动肌肉损伤分类法后与活动相关的下肢肌肉撕裂的结果:系统回顾。","authors":"William L Hollabaugh, Alexander Sin, Rachel Lane Walden, Jennifer S Weaver, Lauren P Porras, Lance E LeClere, Ashley R Karpinos, Rogelio A Coronado, Andrew J Gregory, Jaron P Sullivan","doi":"10.1177/19417381231195529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Muscle injury classification and grading systems have been reported for >100 years; yet it offer limited evidence relating the clinical or radiological qualities of a muscle injury to the pathology or clinical outcome. The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) incorporates recent predictive features of muscle injuries and provides a precise radiographic framework for clinical prediction and management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate clinical outcomes, particularly time to return to play (RTP), reinjury rate (RIR), and prognostic value of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, of activity-related muscle injuries (tears) in athletes after application of the BAMIC.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of PubMed (NLM), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception date of each database through August 31, 2022, was conducted. Keywords included the BAMIC.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All English language studies evaluating clinical outcomes of RTP and RIR after activity-related muscle injuries and where BAMIC was applied were included. A total of 136 articles were identified, and 11 studies met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022353801).</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality of included study was assessed independently by 2 reviewers with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale (NOS); 11 good quality studies (4 prospective cohort studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies) with 468 athletes (57 female) and 574 muscle injuries were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies reported a statistically significant relationship between BAMIC grade, BAMIC injury site, and/or combined BAMIC grade and injury site with RTP. A statistically significant increased RIR was reported by BAMIC grade and BAMIC injury site in 2 of 4 and 3 of 4 studies, respectively. The prognostic value of individual MRI criteria was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent evidence suggests that BAMIC offers prognostic and therapeutic guidance for clinical outcomes, particularly RTP and RIR, after activity-related muscle injuries in athletes that may be superior to previous muscle injury classification and grading systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"783-796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Activity-Related Lower Extremity Muscle Tears After Application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"William L Hollabaugh, Alexander Sin, Rachel Lane Walden, Jennifer S Weaver, Lauren P Porras, Lance E LeClere, Ashley R Karpinos, Rogelio A Coronado, Andrew J Gregory, Jaron P Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231195529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Muscle injury classification and grading systems have been reported for >100 years; yet it offer limited evidence relating the clinical or radiological qualities of a muscle injury to the pathology or clinical outcome. The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) incorporates recent predictive features of muscle injuries and provides a precise radiographic framework for clinical prediction and management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate clinical outcomes, particularly time to return to play (RTP), reinjury rate (RIR), and prognostic value of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, of activity-related muscle injuries (tears) in athletes after application of the BAMIC.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of PubMed (NLM), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception date of each database through August 31, 2022, was conducted. Keywords included the BAMIC.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All English language studies evaluating clinical outcomes of RTP and RIR after activity-related muscle injuries and where BAMIC was applied were included. A total of 136 articles were identified, and 11 studies met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022353801).</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality of included study was assessed independently by 2 reviewers with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale (NOS); 11 good quality studies (4 prospective cohort studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies) with 468 athletes (57 female) and 574 muscle injuries were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studies reported a statistically significant relationship between BAMIC grade, BAMIC injury site, and/or combined BAMIC grade and injury site with RTP. A statistically significant increased RIR was reported by BAMIC grade and BAMIC injury site in 2 of 4 and 3 of 4 studies, respectively. The prognostic value of individual MRI criteria was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent evidence suggests that BAMIC offers prognostic and therapeutic guidance for clinical outcomes, particularly RTP and RIR, after activity-related muscle injuries in athletes that may be superior to previous muscle injury classification and grading systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"783-796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231195529\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231195529","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉损伤分类和分级系统的报道已有 100 多年的历史,但其提供的肌肉损伤临床或放射学质量与病理或临床结果相关的证据却十分有限。英国田径肌肉损伤分类(BAMIC)结合了肌肉损伤的最新预测特征,为临床预测和管理提供了精确的放射学框架:研究采用 BAMIC 后,运动员活动相关肌肉损伤(撕裂)的临床结果,特别是恢复比赛时间(RTP)、再损伤率(RIR)和特定磁共振成像(MRI)结果的预后价值:对PubMed (NLM)、EMBASE (Ovid)、Web of Science (Clarivate)、Cochrane Library (Wiley)和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了检索,检索时间从各数据库的起始日期至2022年8月31日。关键词包括 BAMIC:研究筛选:纳入了所有评估活动相关肌肉损伤后 RTP 和 RIR 临床疗效且应用 BAMIC 的英语研究。研究设计:研究设计:系统综述(PROSPERO:CRD42022353801):数据提取:两名审稿人独立筛选研究的资格并提取数据。两名审查员使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量量表(NOS)对纳入研究的方法学质量进行独立评估;纳入了 11 项质量良好的研究(4 项前瞻性队列研究、7 项回顾性队列研究),涉及 468 名运动员(57 名女性)和 574 处肌肉损伤:所有研究都报告了 BAMIC 等级、BAMIC 受伤部位和/或 BAMIC 等级与受伤部位的组合与 RTP 之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系。4 项研究中的 2 项和 4 项研究中的 3 项分别报告了 BAMIC 等级和 BAMIC 损伤部位与 RIR 有统计学意义的增加关系。个别 MRI 标准的预后价值有限:一致的证据表明,BAMIC 为运动员活动相关肌肉损伤后的临床结果(尤其是 RTP 和 RIR)提供了预后和治疗指导,可能优于之前的肌肉损伤分类和分级系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Activity-Related Lower Extremity Muscle Tears After Application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification: A Systematic Review.

Context: Muscle injury classification and grading systems have been reported for >100 years; yet it offer limited evidence relating the clinical or radiological qualities of a muscle injury to the pathology or clinical outcome. The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) incorporates recent predictive features of muscle injuries and provides a precise radiographic framework for clinical prediction and management.

Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes, particularly time to return to play (RTP), reinjury rate (RIR), and prognostic value of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, of activity-related muscle injuries (tears) in athletes after application of the BAMIC.

Data sources: A search of PubMed (NLM), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception date of each database through August 31, 2022, was conducted. Keywords included the BAMIC.

Study selection: All English language studies evaluating clinical outcomes of RTP and RIR after activity-related muscle injuries and where BAMIC was applied were included. A total of 136 articles were identified, and 11 studies met inclusion criteria.

Study design: Systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42022353801).

Level of evidence: Level 2.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality of included study was assessed independently by 2 reviewers with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale (NOS); 11 good quality studies (4 prospective cohort studies, 7 retrospective cohort studies) with 468 athletes (57 female) and 574 muscle injuries were included.

Results: All studies reported a statistically significant relationship between BAMIC grade, BAMIC injury site, and/or combined BAMIC grade and injury site with RTP. A statistically significant increased RIR was reported by BAMIC grade and BAMIC injury site in 2 of 4 and 3 of 4 studies, respectively. The prognostic value of individual MRI criteria was limited.

Conclusion: Consistent evidence suggests that BAMIC offers prognostic and therapeutic guidance for clinical outcomes, particularly RTP and RIR, after activity-related muscle injuries in athletes that may be superior to previous muscle injury classification and grading systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信