标准化护理考试补救:一个项目评估。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jeanette M Olsen, Dalete Mota, Catherine Wildenberg, Rita J Donahue, Regan Thomas, Nicole Willmus
{"title":"标准化护理考试补救:一个项目评估。","authors":"Jeanette M Olsen,&nbsp;Dalete Mota,&nbsp;Catherine Wildenberg,&nbsp;Rita J Donahue,&nbsp;Regan Thomas,&nbsp;Nicole Willmus","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230712-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (<i>n</i> = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (<i>n</i> = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (<i>p</i> = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(9):519-522.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Nursing Examination Remediation: A Program Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Jeanette M Olsen,&nbsp;Dalete Mota,&nbsp;Catherine Wildenberg,&nbsp;Rita J Donahue,&nbsp;Regan Thomas,&nbsp;Nicole Willmus\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20230712-09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (<i>n</i> = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (<i>n</i> = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (<i>p</i> = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(9):519-522.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年春季,一所公立大学的护士教育工作者扩大了他们的标准化考试计划,包括更多的专业考试,要求补考,并为未达到基准分数的学生重新测试。本研究进行了以补救为重点的项目评估。方法:采用混合方法设计。汇总鉴定健康教育系统公司(HESI)专业考试成绩(n = 907)进行分析。从护理专业学生和最近的校友(n = 70)收集反馈使用质量调查。结果:成绩低于基准的学生,补习时间要求越高,专业复试成绩提高幅度越大。与在校生相比,更多的校友认为补习有帮助(p = 0.029)。确定了参与者关于补救障碍、有用策略和激励政策的观点。从开放式调查评论中出现了五个主题,增加了定量调查结果的深度。结论:对标准化考试的补救策略和政策提出了建议。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;22(6):519-522。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardized Nursing Examination Remediation: A Program Evaluation.

Background: Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.

Method: A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores (n = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni (n = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.

Results: For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful (p = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.

Conclusion: Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(9):519-522.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信