老年最佳血压患者血管僵硬与健康动脉老化。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alessandra Ferreira Mendes Jiticovski, Denis Fabiano Souza, Ercilhana Gonçalves Batista Freitas, Cléria Rodrigues Ferreira, Cristiane de Sousa Pereira, Romário Divino Vilarinho Galvão, Walkiria de Almeida Martins Santos, Erick P de Oliveira, Sebastião Rodrigues Ferreira Filho
{"title":"老年最佳血压患者血管僵硬与健康动脉老化。","authors":"Alessandra Ferreira Mendes Jiticovski, Denis Fabiano Souza, Ercilhana Gonçalves Batista Freitas, Cléria Rodrigues Ferreira, Cristiane de Sousa Pereira, Romário Divino Vilarinho Galvão, Walkiria de Almeida Martins Santos, Erick P de Oliveira, Sebastião Rodrigues Ferreira Filho","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0123en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulse wave velocity is used to diagnose central arterial stiffness (CAS) and quantify healthy vascular aging (HVA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the CAS and HVA in elderly patients with systemic blood pressure levels classified as optimal/normal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 102 patients without comorbidities and with systolic pressure (SP) < 120 mmHg and diastolic pressure (DP) < 80 mmHg were selected from the EVOPIU database (Pulse Wave Velocity of Elderly Individuals in an Urban area of Brazil). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-fPWV) and the central and peripheral pressures were evaluated in all patients. The patients were divided into four groups: G1: (n = 19, with c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s, without medication), G2 (n = 26, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s; without medication), G3 (n = 25, c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication), and G4 (n = 32, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our sample, 56.7% of patients had c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s. The central systolic pressure in G1 [99 (10) mmHg] was lower than that found in the other three groups [vs. 112 (14) mmHg, 111 (15), 112 (20) mmHg; P < 0.05)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older people with optimal arterial blood pressure do not necessarily have HVA and could have c-fPWV values close to the limits established for CAS diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697168/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular stiffness and healthy arterial aging in older patients with optimal blood pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Ferreira Mendes Jiticovski, Denis Fabiano Souza, Ercilhana Gonçalves Batista Freitas, Cléria Rodrigues Ferreira, Cristiane de Sousa Pereira, Romário Divino Vilarinho Galvão, Walkiria de Almeida Martins Santos, Erick P de Oliveira, Sebastião Rodrigues Ferreira Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0123en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulse wave velocity is used to diagnose central arterial stiffness (CAS) and quantify healthy vascular aging (HVA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the CAS and HVA in elderly patients with systemic blood pressure levels classified as optimal/normal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 102 patients without comorbidities and with systolic pressure (SP) < 120 mmHg and diastolic pressure (DP) < 80 mmHg were selected from the EVOPIU database (Pulse Wave Velocity of Elderly Individuals in an Urban area of Brazil). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-fPWV) and the central and peripheral pressures were evaluated in all patients. The patients were divided into four groups: G1: (n = 19, with c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s, without medication), G2 (n = 26, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s; without medication), G3 (n = 25, c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication), and G4 (n = 32, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our sample, 56.7% of patients had c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s. The central systolic pressure in G1 [99 (10) mmHg] was lower than that found in the other three groups [vs. 112 (14) mmHg, 111 (15), 112 (20) mmHg; P < 0.05)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older people with optimal arterial blood pressure do not necessarily have HVA and could have c-fPWV values close to the limits established for CAS diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0123en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2022-0123en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

脉搏波速度用于诊断中央动脉硬度(CAS)和量化健康血管老化(HVA)。目的:评价老年体血压水平为最佳/正常的患者的CAS和HVA。方法:选取巴西城市地区EVOPIU数据库中收缩压(SP) < 120 mmHg、舒张压(DP) < 80 mmHg、无合并症的102例患者。评估所有患者的颈股动脉脉波速度(c-fPWV)和中央和外周压力。患者分为4组:G1组(n = 19, c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s,未用药),G2组(n = 26, c-fPWV≥7.6 m/s;G3组(n = 25,服用降压药后c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s), G4组(n = 32,服用降压药后c-fPWV≥7.6 m/s)。结果:在我们的样本中,56.7%的患者c-fPWV≥7.6 m/s。G1组中央收缩压[99 (10)mmHg]低于其他三组[vs. 112 (14) mmHg, 111 (15), 112 (20) mmHg;P < 0.05)。结论:动脉血压最佳的老年人不一定患有HVA,其c-fPWV值可能接近CAS诊断的限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vascular stiffness and healthy arterial aging in older patients with optimal blood pressure.

Introduction: Pulse wave velocity is used to diagnose central arterial stiffness (CAS) and quantify healthy vascular aging (HVA).

Objective: To evaluate the CAS and HVA in elderly patients with systemic blood pressure levels classified as optimal/normal.

Methods: A total of 102 patients without comorbidities and with systolic pressure (SP) < 120 mmHg and diastolic pressure (DP) < 80 mmHg were selected from the EVOPIU database (Pulse Wave Velocity of Elderly Individuals in an Urban area of Brazil). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-fPWV) and the central and peripheral pressures were evaluated in all patients. The patients were divided into four groups: G1: (n = 19, with c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s, without medication), G2 (n = 26, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s; without medication), G3 (n = 25, c-fPWV < 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication), and G4 (n = 32, c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s with antihypertensive medication).

Results: In our sample, 56.7% of patients had c-fPWV ≥ 7.6 m/s. The central systolic pressure in G1 [99 (10) mmHg] was lower than that found in the other three groups [vs. 112 (14) mmHg, 111 (15), 112 (20) mmHg; P < 0.05)].

Conclusion: Older people with optimal arterial blood pressure do not necessarily have HVA and could have c-fPWV values close to the limits established for CAS diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信