冷冻囊胚移植前激素替代疗法周期中雌二醇治疗持续时间对活产率的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-03 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2022.2163467
Juliette Joly, Thomas Goronflot, Arnaud Reignier, Martin Rosselot, Florence Leperlier, Paul Barrière, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Thomas Fréour, Tiphaine Lefebvre
{"title":"冷冻囊胚移植前激素替代疗法周期中雌二醇治疗持续时间对活产率的影响。","authors":"Juliette Joly, Thomas Goronflot, Arnaud Reignier, Martin Rosselot, Florence Leperlier, Paul Barrière, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Thomas Fréour, Tiphaine Lefebvre","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2022.2163467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the duration of progesterone administration in Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) cycles before frozen embryo transfer is standardized, the optimal duration of oestrogen treatment remains controversial. In this monocentric retrospective study conducted in all single frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) performed with HRT between January 2016 and July 2019, we evaluated the association between the duration of oestradiol treatment before FBT and live birth rate (LBR) in HRT cycles. Cycles were gathered in 3 groups according to quartiles of duration of oestrogen treatment. LBR was compared across the 3 groups and multivariate analysis was performed. We included 2235 single FBT cycles; 507, 1257 and 471 with E2 treatment below 23 days, 23-30 days (reference) and more than 30 days respectively. After multivariate analysis and adjustment, no significant difference in LBR was found between below 23 or more than 30 days and reference groups (OR = 0.93 [0.68-1.27] and OR = 1.29 [0.88-1.89] respectively). Complementary sensitivity analysis led to a non-significant adjusted OR = 1.66 [IC 0.9-3.1]. In conclusion, our study showed that the duration of E2 treatment in HRT cycles before FBT is not associated with LBR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the duration of oestradiol treatment on live birth rate in Hormonal Replacement Therapy cycle before frozen blastocyst transfer.\",\"authors\":\"Juliette Joly, Thomas Goronflot, Arnaud Reignier, Martin Rosselot, Florence Leperlier, Paul Barrière, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Thomas Fréour, Tiphaine Lefebvre\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14647273.2022.2163467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the duration of progesterone administration in Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) cycles before frozen embryo transfer is standardized, the optimal duration of oestrogen treatment remains controversial. In this monocentric retrospective study conducted in all single frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) performed with HRT between January 2016 and July 2019, we evaluated the association between the duration of oestradiol treatment before FBT and live birth rate (LBR) in HRT cycles. Cycles were gathered in 3 groups according to quartiles of duration of oestrogen treatment. LBR was compared across the 3 groups and multivariate analysis was performed. We included 2235 single FBT cycles; 507, 1257 and 471 with E2 treatment below 23 days, 23-30 days (reference) and more than 30 days respectively. After multivariate analysis and adjustment, no significant difference in LBR was found between below 23 or more than 30 days and reference groups (OR = 0.93 [0.68-1.27] and OR = 1.29 [0.88-1.89] respectively). Complementary sensitivity analysis led to a non-significant adjusted OR = 1.66 [IC 0.9-3.1]. In conclusion, our study showed that the duration of E2 treatment in HRT cycles before FBT is not associated with LBR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Fertility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Fertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2022.2163467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2022.2163467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管在冷冻胚胎移植前的荷尔蒙替代疗法(HRT)周期中,黄体酮的给药时间是标准化的,但雌激素的最佳治疗时间仍存在争议。在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们对2016年1月至2019年7月期间使用HRT进行的所有单次冷冻囊胚移植(FBT)进行了研究,评估了HRT周期中FBT前雌二醇治疗持续时间与活产率(LBR)之间的关系。根据雌激素治疗持续时间的四分位数将周期分为 3 组。对 3 组的活产率进行比较,并进行多变量分析。我们纳入了 2235 个单次 FBT 周期;E2 治疗时间低于 23 天、23-30 天(参考值)和 30 天以上的周期分别为 507、1257 和 471 个。经过多变量分析和调整后,发现低于 23 天或超过 30 天组与参照组之间的 LBR 没有显著差异(OR = 0.93 [0.68-1.27] 和 OR = 1.29 [0.88-1.89])。补充敏感性分析得出的调整 OR = 1.66 [IC 0.9-3.1]不显著。总之,我们的研究表明,FBT 前 HRT 周期中 E2 治疗的持续时间与 LBR 无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the duration of oestradiol treatment on live birth rate in Hormonal Replacement Therapy cycle before frozen blastocyst transfer.

Although the duration of progesterone administration in Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT) cycles before frozen embryo transfer is standardized, the optimal duration of oestrogen treatment remains controversial. In this monocentric retrospective study conducted in all single frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) performed with HRT between January 2016 and July 2019, we evaluated the association between the duration of oestradiol treatment before FBT and live birth rate (LBR) in HRT cycles. Cycles were gathered in 3 groups according to quartiles of duration of oestrogen treatment. LBR was compared across the 3 groups and multivariate analysis was performed. We included 2235 single FBT cycles; 507, 1257 and 471 with E2 treatment below 23 days, 23-30 days (reference) and more than 30 days respectively. After multivariate analysis and adjustment, no significant difference in LBR was found between below 23 or more than 30 days and reference groups (OR = 0.93 [0.68-1.27] and OR = 1.29 [0.88-1.89] respectively). Complementary sensitivity analysis led to a non-significant adjusted OR = 1.66 [IC 0.9-3.1]. In conclusion, our study showed that the duration of E2 treatment in HRT cycles before FBT is not associated with LBR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信