苏比利/缬沙坦对高血压合并持续性房颤患者射频消融的疗效评价。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s10557-023-07493-6
Xiaobiao Zang, Zhihan Zhao, Ke Chen, Weifeng Song, Jifang Ma, You Zhou, Erpeng Liang, Haixia Fu, Xianqing Wang, Yonghui Zhao, Rongfeng Zhang
{"title":"苏比利/缬沙坦对高血压合并持续性房颤患者射频消融的疗效评价。","authors":"Xiaobiao Zang, Zhihan Zhao, Ke Chen, Weifeng Song, Jifang Ma, You Zhou, Erpeng Liang, Haixia Fu, Xianqing Wang, Yonghui Zhao, Rongfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10557-023-07493-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the effect of radiofrequency ablation can be improved by using sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) to control blood pressure in hypertensive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 63 and 67 hypertension patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled in an S/V group and ACEI/ARB group, respectively. All patients underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The blood pressure of the two groups was controlled within the range of 100-140 mmHg (high pressure) and 60-90 mmHg (low pressure). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were observed after 12 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in blood pressure were observed between the S/V and ACEI/ARB groups. In addition, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation between the two groups was not different. The left atrial diameter was an independent predictor of recurrence (HR = 1.063, P = 0.008). However, in the heart failure subgroup, the recurrence rate of S/V was significantly lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group (P = 0.005), and Cox regression analysis showed that the recurrence risk of atrial fibrillation of the S/V group was 0.302 lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group. NT-proBNP, LVEF, and LAD were significantly improved in hypertension patients with heart failure when comparing cases before and at the end of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S/V is better than ACEI/ARB in reducing the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension and heart failure after RFCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hypertension and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobiao Zang, Zhihan Zhao, Ke Chen, Weifeng Song, Jifang Ma, You Zhou, Erpeng Liang, Haixia Fu, Xianqing Wang, Yonghui Zhao, Rongfeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-023-07493-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the effect of radiofrequency ablation can be improved by using sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) to control blood pressure in hypertensive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 63 and 67 hypertension patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled in an S/V group and ACEI/ARB group, respectively. All patients underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The blood pressure of the two groups was controlled within the range of 100-140 mmHg (high pressure) and 60-90 mmHg (low pressure). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were observed after 12 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in blood pressure were observed between the S/V and ACEI/ARB groups. In addition, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation between the two groups was not different. The left atrial diameter was an independent predictor of recurrence (HR = 1.063, P = 0.008). However, in the heart failure subgroup, the recurrence rate of S/V was significantly lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group (P = 0.005), and Cox regression analysis showed that the recurrence risk of atrial fibrillation of the S/V group was 0.302 lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group. NT-proBNP, LVEF, and LAD were significantly improved in hypertension patients with heart failure when comparing cases before and at the end of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S/V is better than ACEI/ARB in reducing the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension and heart failure after RFCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-023-07493-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-023-07493-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价苏比利/缬沙坦(S/V)控制高血压合并持续性房颤患者的血压是否能改善射频消融的效果。方法:将63例高血压合并持续性心房颤动患者分为S/V组和ACEI/ARB组。所有患者均行导管射频消融术(RFCA)。两组患者血压控制在100-140 mmHg(高压)和60-90 mmHg(低压)范围内。随访12个月后观察两组患者的临床疗效。结果:S/V组与ACEI/ARB组血压无显著差异。此外,两组间房颤复发率无明显差异。左房内径是复发的独立预测因子(HR = 1.063, P = 0.008)。但在心力衰竭亚组中,S/V复发率明显低于ACEI/ARB组(P = 0.005), Cox回归分析显示,S/V组房颤复发风险比ACEI/ARB组低0.302。随访前和随访结束时,高血压心衰患者NT-proBNP、LVEF、LAD均有显著改善。结论:S/V比ACEI/ARB更能降低高血压合并心力衰竭患者RFCA术后持续性房颤的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hypertension and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hypertension and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Objective: To evaluate whether the effect of radiofrequency ablation can be improved by using sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) to control blood pressure in hypertensive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Methods: A total of 63 and 67 hypertension patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled in an S/V group and ACEI/ARB group, respectively. All patients underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The blood pressure of the two groups was controlled within the range of 100-140 mmHg (high pressure) and 60-90 mmHg (low pressure). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were observed after 12 months of follow-up.

Results: No significant differences in blood pressure were observed between the S/V and ACEI/ARB groups. In addition, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation between the two groups was not different. The left atrial diameter was an independent predictor of recurrence (HR = 1.063, P = 0.008). However, in the heart failure subgroup, the recurrence rate of S/V was significantly lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group (P = 0.005), and Cox regression analysis showed that the recurrence risk of atrial fibrillation of the S/V group was 0.302 lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group. NT-proBNP, LVEF, and LAD were significantly improved in hypertension patients with heart failure when comparing cases before and at the end of follow-up.

Conclusions: S/V is better than ACEI/ARB in reducing the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension and heart failure after RFCA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信