X线相衬断层扫描分析囊腔扩张无明显内漏的机制

Q3 Medicine
Takateru Yamamoto MD , Takuro Tsukube MD, PhD , Yuko Wada MD, PhD , Masato Hoshino PhD , Naoto Yagi PhD , Kazunori Nakagawa PhD , Yutaka Nakashima MD, PhD , Kenji Okada MD, PhD , Tatsuichiro Seto MD, PhD
{"title":"X线相衬断层扫描分析囊腔扩张无明显内漏的机制","authors":"Takateru Yamamoto MD ,&nbsp;Takuro Tsukube MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuko Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masato Hoshino PhD ,&nbsp;Naoto Yagi PhD ,&nbsp;Kazunori Nakagawa PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Nakashima MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kenji Okada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tatsuichiro Seto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Synchrotron radiation-based X ray phase-contrast tomography (XPCT) was used in this study to evaluate abdominal aorta specimens from patients with sac expansion without evidence of an endoleak (endotension) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic structure of the aortic wall in patients with this condition and to establish the cause of the endotension.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Human aortic specimens of the abdominal aorta were obtained during open repair, fixed with formalin, and analyzed among three groups. Group A was specimens from open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (n = 7). Group E was specimens from sac expansion without an evident endoleak after EVAR (n = 7). Group N was specimens from non-aneurysmal “normal” cadaveric abdominal aortas (n = 5). Using XPCT (effective voxel size, 12.5 μm; density resolution, 1 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), we measured the density of the tunica media (TM) in six regions of each sample. Then, any changes to the elastic lamina and the vasa vasorum were analyzed pathologically. The specimens were immunohistochemically examined with anti-CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time from EVAR to open aortic repair was 64.2 ± 7.2 months. There were significant differences in the thickness of the TM among three groups: 0.98 ± 0.03 mm in Group N; 0.31 ± 0.01 mm in Group A; and 0.15 ± 0.03 mm in Group E (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). There were significant differences in the TM density among the groups: 1.087 ± 0.004 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group N; 1.070 ± 0.001 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group A; and 1.062 ± 0.007 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group E (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). Differences in the thickness and density of the TM correlated with the thickness of the elastic lamina; in Group N, uniform high-density elastic fibers were observed in the TM. By contrast, a thinning of the elastic lamina in the TM was observed in Group A. A marked thinness and loss of elastic fibers was observed in Group E. CD31 immunostaining revealed that the vasa vasorum was localized in the adventitia and inside the outer third of the TM in Group N, and in the middle of the TM in Group A. In Group E, the vasa vasorum advanced up to the intima with vascular endothelial growth factor-positive cells in the intimal section.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>XPCT could be used to demonstrate the densitometric property of the aortic aneurysmal wall after EVAR. We confirmed that the deformation process that occurs in the sac expansion after EVAR without evidence of an endoleak could be explained by hypoxia in the aortic wall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74035,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular science","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/1f/main.PMC10474490.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanism of sac expansion without evident endoleak analyzed with X ray phase-contrast tomography\",\"authors\":\"Takateru Yamamoto MD ,&nbsp;Takuro Tsukube MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuko Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masato Hoshino PhD ,&nbsp;Naoto Yagi PhD ,&nbsp;Kazunori Nakagawa PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Nakashima MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kenji Okada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tatsuichiro Seto MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Synchrotron radiation-based X ray phase-contrast tomography (XPCT) was used in this study to evaluate abdominal aorta specimens from patients with sac expansion without evidence of an endoleak (endotension) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic structure of the aortic wall in patients with this condition and to establish the cause of the endotension.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Human aortic specimens of the abdominal aorta were obtained during open repair, fixed with formalin, and analyzed among three groups. Group A was specimens from open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (n = 7). Group E was specimens from sac expansion without an evident endoleak after EVAR (n = 7). Group N was specimens from non-aneurysmal “normal” cadaveric abdominal aortas (n = 5). Using XPCT (effective voxel size, 12.5 μm; density resolution, 1 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), we measured the density of the tunica media (TM) in six regions of each sample. Then, any changes to the elastic lamina and the vasa vasorum were analyzed pathologically. The specimens were immunohistochemically examined with anti-CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time from EVAR to open aortic repair was 64.2 ± 7.2 months. There were significant differences in the thickness of the TM among three groups: 0.98 ± 0.03 mm in Group N; 0.31 ± 0.01 mm in Group A; and 0.15 ± 0.03 mm in Group E (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). There were significant differences in the TM density among the groups: 1.087 ± 0.004 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group N; 1.070 ± 0.001 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group A; and 1.062 ± 0.007 g/cm<sup>3</sup> in Group E (<em>P</em> &lt; .005). Differences in the thickness and density of the TM correlated with the thickness of the elastic lamina; in Group N, uniform high-density elastic fibers were observed in the TM. By contrast, a thinning of the elastic lamina in the TM was observed in Group A. A marked thinness and loss of elastic fibers was observed in Group E. CD31 immunostaining revealed that the vasa vasorum was localized in the adventitia and inside the outer third of the TM in Group N, and in the middle of the TM in Group A. In Group E, the vasa vasorum advanced up to the intima with vascular endothelial growth factor-positive cells in the intimal section.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>XPCT could be used to demonstrate the densitometric property of the aortic aneurysmal wall after EVAR. We confirmed that the deformation process that occurs in the sac expansion after EVAR without evidence of an endoleak could be explained by hypoxia in the aortic wall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/1f/main.PMC10474490.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350323000275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350323000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究使用基于同步辐射的X射线相位对比断层扫描(XPCT)来评估腹主动脉瘤(AAA)腔内主动脉修复(EVAR)后囊扩张患者的腹主动脉样本,这些样本没有内漏(内张)的证据。本研究的目的是分析这种情况下患者主动脉壁的形态学结构,并确定主动脉壁内张的原因。方法取人腹主动脉开放修复标本,福尔马林固定,分三组进行分析。A组为开放性腹主动脉瘤修复标本(n=7)。E组为EVAR后无明显内漏的囊扩张标本(n=7)。N组是来自非动脉瘤“正常”尸体腹部主动脉的标本(N=5)。使用XPCT(有效体素大小,12.5μm;密度分辨率,1 mg/cm3),我们测量了每个样本六个区域的中膜(TM)密度。然后,对弹力层和输精管的任何变化进行病理分析。用抗CD31和血管内皮生长因子抗体对标本进行免疫组织化学检查。结果EVAR至主动脉开放修复时间为64.2±7.2个月,三组间TM厚度差异有统计学意义:N组为0.98±0.03mm;A组0.31±0.01mm;E组为0.15±0.03mm(P<0.005)。各组间TM密度有显著差异:N组为1.087±0.004g/cm3;A组1.070±0.001 g/cm3;E组为1.062±0.007g/cm3(P<0.005)。TM厚度和密度的差异与弹性层的厚度相关;在第N组中,在TM中观察到均匀的高密度弹性纤维。相反,在第a组中观察到TM中弹性薄层变薄。在第E组观察到弹性纤维的明显变薄和丢失。CD31免疫染色显示,血管血管狭窄定位于第N组的TM的外膜和外三分之一内,在a组中位于TM的中部。在E组中,输精管向内膜推进,内膜切片中有血管内皮生长因子阳性细胞。结论sXPCT可用于显示EVAR后主动脉瘤壁的密度特性。我们证实,在没有内漏证据的情况下,EVAR后囊扩张中发生的变形过程可以通过主动脉壁缺氧来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanism of sac expansion without evident endoleak analyzed with X ray phase-contrast tomography

Mechanism of sac expansion without evident endoleak analyzed with X ray phase-contrast tomography

Mechanism of sac expansion without evident endoleak analyzed with X ray phase-contrast tomography

Mechanism of sac expansion without evident endoleak analyzed with X ray phase-contrast tomography

Objective

Synchrotron radiation-based X ray phase-contrast tomography (XPCT) was used in this study to evaluate abdominal aorta specimens from patients with sac expansion without evidence of an endoleak (endotension) following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic structure of the aortic wall in patients with this condition and to establish the cause of the endotension.

Methods

Human aortic specimens of the abdominal aorta were obtained during open repair, fixed with formalin, and analyzed among three groups. Group A was specimens from open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (n = 7). Group E was specimens from sac expansion without an evident endoleak after EVAR (n = 7). Group N was specimens from non-aneurysmal “normal” cadaveric abdominal aortas (n = 5). Using XPCT (effective voxel size, 12.5 μm; density resolution, 1 mg/cm3), we measured the density of the tunica media (TM) in six regions of each sample. Then, any changes to the elastic lamina and the vasa vasorum were analyzed pathologically. The specimens were immunohistochemically examined with anti-CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies.

Results

The time from EVAR to open aortic repair was 64.2 ± 7.2 months. There were significant differences in the thickness of the TM among three groups: 0.98 ± 0.03 mm in Group N; 0.31 ± 0.01 mm in Group A; and 0.15 ± 0.03 mm in Group E (P < .005). There were significant differences in the TM density among the groups: 1.087 ± 0.004 g/cm3 in Group N; 1.070 ± 0.001 g/cm3 in Group A; and 1.062 ± 0.007 g/cm3 in Group E (P < .005). Differences in the thickness and density of the TM correlated with the thickness of the elastic lamina; in Group N, uniform high-density elastic fibers were observed in the TM. By contrast, a thinning of the elastic lamina in the TM was observed in Group A. A marked thinness and loss of elastic fibers was observed in Group E. CD31 immunostaining revealed that the vasa vasorum was localized in the adventitia and inside the outer third of the TM in Group N, and in the middle of the TM in Group A. In Group E, the vasa vasorum advanced up to the intima with vascular endothelial growth factor-positive cells in the intimal section.

Conclusions

XPCT could be used to demonstrate the densitometric property of the aortic aneurysmal wall after EVAR. We confirmed that the deformation process that occurs in the sac expansion after EVAR without evidence of an endoleak could be explained by hypoxia in the aortic wall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信