发育不典型时智力残疾的评估和诊断。一项针对 CHARGE 综合征患者的挪威人口研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485
Lynn Skei, Sigmund Skei, Stephen von Tetzchner, Timothy Hartshorne, Nils Inge Landrø
{"title":"发育不典型时智力残疾的评估和诊断。一项针对 CHARGE 综合征患者的挪威人口研究。","authors":"Lynn Skei, Sigmund Skei, Stephen von Tetzchner, Timothy Hartshorne, Nils Inge Landrø","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aimed to answer how psychometric methods based on neurotypical populations can serve as valid instruments in the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability in individuals with atypical development. The genetic, structural, and functional features of CHARGE make it uniquely suited to address this question.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A Norwegian population of individuals with CHARGE (<i>N</i> = 35) underwent assessment procedures according to DSM-5 guidelines for the evaluation of an intellectual disability diagnosis. Results from cognitive testing (Wechsler Intelligence Scales) and parental evaluation of adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale) were obtained and compared to their respective norm samples to explore any methodological inconsistencies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Significant differences emerged between the participants and the norm samples. Global cognition obtained from Wechsler revealed a bimodal distribution, suggesting a two-group sample, with the youngest children forming their own subgroup. Comparisons of the different age-groups' performances demonstrated the lowest results among the preschoolers while the adults scored the highest. The global adaptive behavior score turned out significantly lower than the performance-based scores, thereby deflating the overall estimate of global intellectual abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For individuals with CHARGE, the effect of the atypicality seemed most apparent during early childhood, stabilizing and subsiding towards adulthood. The test results' interpretability was weakest for the preschoolers progressively increasing until peaking in adulthood, emphasizing the importance of delaying the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability. Because of several validity issues connected to the observation-based measure, complementary testing should precede clinical evaluations when possible in the diagnostics of individuals with CHARGE.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1120-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability when development is atypical. A Norwegian population study of individuals with CHARGE syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Skei, Sigmund Skei, Stephen von Tetzchner, Timothy Hartshorne, Nils Inge Landrø\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aimed to answer how psychometric methods based on neurotypical populations can serve as valid instruments in the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability in individuals with atypical development. The genetic, structural, and functional features of CHARGE make it uniquely suited to address this question.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A Norwegian population of individuals with CHARGE (<i>N</i> = 35) underwent assessment procedures according to DSM-5 guidelines for the evaluation of an intellectual disability diagnosis. Results from cognitive testing (Wechsler Intelligence Scales) and parental evaluation of adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale) were obtained and compared to their respective norm samples to explore any methodological inconsistencies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Significant differences emerged between the participants and the norm samples. Global cognition obtained from Wechsler revealed a bimodal distribution, suggesting a two-group sample, with the youngest children forming their own subgroup. Comparisons of the different age-groups' performances demonstrated the lowest results among the preschoolers while the adults scored the highest. The global adaptive behavior score turned out significantly lower than the performance-based scores, thereby deflating the overall estimate of global intellectual abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For individuals with CHARGE, the effect of the atypicality seemed most apparent during early childhood, stabilizing and subsiding towards adulthood. The test results' interpretability was weakest for the preschoolers progressively increasing until peaking in adulthood, emphasizing the importance of delaying the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability. Because of several validity issues connected to the observation-based measure, complementary testing should precede clinical evaluations when possible in the diagnostics of individuals with CHARGE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1120-1133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2023.2240485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在回答以神经畸形人群为基础的心理测量方法如何作为有效工具来评估和诊断发育不典型个体的智力障碍。CHARGE的遗传、结构和功能特征使其成为解决这一问题的独特工具:挪威 CHARGE 患者(35 人)根据 DSM-5 指南接受了智力障碍诊断评估程序。我们获得了认知测试(韦氏智力测验量表)和家长适应能力评估(文兰省适应行为量表)的结果,并将其与各自的常模样本进行了比较,以探讨方法上的不一致之处:结果:参与者与常模样本之间存在显著差异。韦克斯勒(Wechsler)全球认知量表显示出双峰分布,表明这是一个两组样本,其中年龄最小的儿童形成了自己的亚组。不同年龄组的成绩比较显示,学龄前儿童的成绩最低,而成人的成绩最高。总体适应行为得分明显低于基于表现的得分,从而削弱了对总体智力能力的总体估计:结论:对 CHARGE 患者而言,非典型性的影响似乎在幼儿期最为明显,在成年期趋于稳定和消退。测试结果的可解释性在学龄前儿童中最弱,并逐渐增加,直到成年期达到顶峰,这强调了延迟评估和诊断智力障碍的重要性。由于基于观察的测量方法存在一些有效性问题,因此在诊断 CHARGE 患者时,应尽可能在临床评估之前进行补充测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability when development is atypical. A Norwegian population study of individuals with CHARGE syndrome.

Aim: This paper aimed to answer how psychometric methods based on neurotypical populations can serve as valid instruments in the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability in individuals with atypical development. The genetic, structural, and functional features of CHARGE make it uniquely suited to address this question.

Method: A Norwegian population of individuals with CHARGE (N = 35) underwent assessment procedures according to DSM-5 guidelines for the evaluation of an intellectual disability diagnosis. Results from cognitive testing (Wechsler Intelligence Scales) and parental evaluation of adaptive skills (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scale) were obtained and compared to their respective norm samples to explore any methodological inconsistencies.

Result: Significant differences emerged between the participants and the norm samples. Global cognition obtained from Wechsler revealed a bimodal distribution, suggesting a two-group sample, with the youngest children forming their own subgroup. Comparisons of the different age-groups' performances demonstrated the lowest results among the preschoolers while the adults scored the highest. The global adaptive behavior score turned out significantly lower than the performance-based scores, thereby deflating the overall estimate of global intellectual abilities.

Conclusion: For individuals with CHARGE, the effect of the atypicality seemed most apparent during early childhood, stabilizing and subsiding towards adulthood. The test results' interpretability was weakest for the preschoolers progressively increasing until peaking in adulthood, emphasizing the importance of delaying the assessment and diagnosis of intellectual disability. Because of several validity issues connected to the observation-based measure, complementary testing should precede clinical evaluations when possible in the diagnostics of individuals with CHARGE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信