快速抗原检测与病毒分离对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型传染性的临床评估

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tai-Ling Chao , Wen-Hau Lee , Hui-Chun Hu , Yi-Chun Lin , Shu-Yuan Ho , Hui-Hou Chen , Cheng-Pin Chen , Ya-Min Tsai , Jun-Tung Fang , Si-Man Leong , Yu-Chen Cheng , Mavis Peng , Shu-Hsing Cheng , Chien-Yu Cheng , Sui-Yuan Chang
{"title":"快速抗原检测与病毒分离对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型传染性的临床评估","authors":"Tai-Ling Chao ,&nbsp;Wen-Hau Lee ,&nbsp;Hui-Chun Hu ,&nbsp;Yi-Chun Lin ,&nbsp;Shu-Yuan Ho ,&nbsp;Hui-Hou Chen ,&nbsp;Cheng-Pin Chen ,&nbsp;Ya-Min Tsai ,&nbsp;Jun-Tung Fang ,&nbsp;Si-Man Leong ,&nbsp;Yu-Chen Cheng ,&nbsp;Mavis Peng ,&nbsp;Shu-Hsing Cheng ,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Cheng ,&nbsp;Sui-Yuan Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) remains as a golden standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, it can not be easily expanded to large-scaled screening during outbreaks, and the positive results do not necessarily correlate with infectious status of the identified subjects. In this study, the performance of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (RAT) and its correlation with virus infectivity was examined by virus culture using 163 sequential respiratory specimens collected from 26 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. When the presence of cytopathic effects (CPE) in cell culture was used as a reference method for virus infectivity, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test was 96.43%, 89.63%, and 90.8%, respectively. The highest Ct value was 27.7 for RdRp gene and 25.79 for E gene within CPE-positive samples, and the highest Ct value was 31.9 for RdRp gene and 29.1 for E gene within RAT positive samples. When the Ct values of specimens were below 25, the CPE and RAT results had high degree of consistency. We concluded that the RAT could be a great alternative method for determining the infectious potential of individuals with high viral load.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798665/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by rapid antigen test compared with virus isolation\",\"authors\":\"Tai-Ling Chao ,&nbsp;Wen-Hau Lee ,&nbsp;Hui-Chun Hu ,&nbsp;Yi-Chun Lin ,&nbsp;Shu-Yuan Ho ,&nbsp;Hui-Hou Chen ,&nbsp;Cheng-Pin Chen ,&nbsp;Ya-Min Tsai ,&nbsp;Jun-Tung Fang ,&nbsp;Si-Man Leong ,&nbsp;Yu-Chen Cheng ,&nbsp;Mavis Peng ,&nbsp;Shu-Hsing Cheng ,&nbsp;Chien-Yu Cheng ,&nbsp;Sui-Yuan Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) remains as a golden standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, it can not be easily expanded to large-scaled screening during outbreaks, and the positive results do not necessarily correlate with infectious status of the identified subjects. In this study, the performance of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (RAT) and its correlation with virus infectivity was examined by virus culture using 163 sequential respiratory specimens collected from 26 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. When the presence of cytopathic effects (CPE) in cell culture was used as a reference method for virus infectivity, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test was 96.43%, 89.63%, and 90.8%, respectively. The highest Ct value was 27.7 for RdRp gene and 25.79 for E gene within CPE-positive samples, and the highest Ct value was 31.9 for RdRp gene and 29.1 for E gene within RAT positive samples. When the Ct values of specimens were below 25, the CPE and RAT results had high degree of consistency. We concluded that the RAT could be a great alternative method for determining the infectious potential of individuals with high viral load.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管实时逆转录聚合酶链式反应(实时RT-PCR)仍然是检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)感染的黄金标准,但在疫情爆发期间,它不容易扩展到大规模筛查,阳性结果也不一定与已确定受试者的感染状态相关。在这项研究中,使用从26名SARS-CoV-2感染患者中采集的163份连续呼吸道样本,通过病毒培养来检查Vstrip®RV2新冠肺炎抗原快速检测(RAT)的性能及其与病毒传染性的相关性。当细胞培养中存在细胞病变效应(CPE)作为病毒感染性的参考方法时,Vstrip®RV2新冠肺炎抗原快速检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.43%、89.63%和90.8%。CPE阳性样本中RdRp基因和E基因的最高Ct值分别为27.7和25.79,RAT阳性样本中的RdRp和E基因分别为31.9和29.1。当标本的Ct值低于25时,CPE和RAT结果具有高度一致性。我们得出结论,RAT可能是确定高病毒载量个体感染潜力的一种很好的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by rapid antigen test compared with virus isolation

Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by rapid antigen test compared with virus isolation

Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by rapid antigen test compared with virus isolation

Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by rapid antigen test compared with virus isolation

Although real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) remains as a golden standard for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, it can not be easily expanded to large-scaled screening during outbreaks, and the positive results do not necessarily correlate with infectious status of the identified subjects. In this study, the performance of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (RAT) and its correlation with virus infectivity was examined by virus culture using 163 sequential respiratory specimens collected from 26 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. When the presence of cytopathic effects (CPE) in cell culture was used as a reference method for virus infectivity, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Vstrip® RV2 COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test was 96.43%, 89.63%, and 90.8%, respectively. The highest Ct value was 27.7 for RdRp gene and 25.79 for E gene within CPE-positive samples, and the highest Ct value was 31.9 for RdRp gene and 29.1 for E gene within RAT positive samples. When the Ct values of specimens were below 25, the CPE and RAT results had high degree of consistency. We concluded that the RAT could be a great alternative method for determining the infectious potential of individuals with high viral load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信