公众对外国保护主义的反应:来自中美贸易战的证据。

David A Steinberg, Yeling Tan
{"title":"公众对外国保护主义的反应:来自中美贸易战的证据。","authors":"David A Steinberg,&nbsp;Yeling Tan","doi":"10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>America's recent turn towards protectionism has raised concerns over the future viability of the liberal international trading system. This study examines how and why public attitudes towards international trade change when one's country is targeted by protectionist measures from abroad. To address this question, we fielded three original survey experiments in the country most affected by US protectionism: China. First, we find consistent evidence that US protectionism reduces support for trade among Chinese citizens. We replicate this finding in parallel experiments on technology cooperation, and provide further external validation with a survey experiment in Argentina. Second, we show that responses to US protectionism reflect both a \"direct reciprocity\" logic, whereby citizens want to retaliate against the US specifically, as well as a \"generalized reciprocity\" logic that reduces support for trade on a broader, systemic, basis.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":75182,"journal":{"name":"The review of international organizations","volume":"18 1","pages":"145-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174621/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war.\",\"authors\":\"David A Steinberg,&nbsp;Yeling Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>America's recent turn towards protectionism has raised concerns over the future viability of the liberal international trading system. This study examines how and why public attitudes towards international trade change when one's country is targeted by protectionist measures from abroad. To address this question, we fielded three original survey experiments in the country most affected by US protectionism: China. First, we find consistent evidence that US protectionism reduces support for trade among Chinese citizens. We replicate this finding in parallel experiments on technology cooperation, and provide further external validation with a survey experiment in Argentina. Second, we show that responses to US protectionism reflect both a \\\"direct reciprocity\\\" logic, whereby citizens want to retaliate against the US specifically, as well as a \\\"generalized reciprocity\\\" logic that reduces support for trade on a broader, systemic, basis.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"145-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The review of international organizations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The review of international organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

美国最近转向保护主义,引发了人们对自由国际贸易体系未来可行性的担忧。本研究探讨了当一个国家成为国外保护主义措施的目标时,公众对国际贸易的态度如何以及为什么会发生变化。为了回答这个问题,我们在受美国保护主义影响最严重的国家——中国——进行了三项原创调查实验。首先,我们发现一致的证据表明,美国的保护主义减少了中国公民对贸易的支持。我们在技术合作的平行实验中重复了这一发现,并通过在阿根廷进行的调查实验提供了进一步的外部验证。其次,我们表明,对美国保护主义的反应既反映了“直接互惠”逻辑,即公民希望专门对美国进行报复,也反映了“广义互惠”逻辑,即在更广泛、系统性的基础上减少对贸易的支持。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,获取地址为10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war.

Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war.

Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war.

Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war.

America's recent turn towards protectionism has raised concerns over the future viability of the liberal international trading system. This study examines how and why public attitudes towards international trade change when one's country is targeted by protectionist measures from abroad. To address this question, we fielded three original survey experiments in the country most affected by US protectionism: China. First, we find consistent evidence that US protectionism reduces support for trade among Chinese citizens. We replicate this finding in parallel experiments on technology cooperation, and provide further external validation with a survey experiment in Argentina. Second, we show that responses to US protectionism reflect both a "direct reciprocity" logic, whereby citizens want to retaliate against the US specifically, as well as a "generalized reciprocity" logic that reduces support for trade on a broader, systemic, basis.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信