Ian Ross, Sarah Bick, Philip Ayieko, Robert Dreibelbis, Jennyfer Wolf, Matthew C Freeman, Elizabeth Allen, Michael Brauer, Oliver Cumming
{"title":"在低收入和中等收入国家用肥皂洗手预防急性呼吸道感染的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ian Ross, Sarah Bick, Philip Ayieko, Robert Dreibelbis, Jennyfer Wolf, Matthew C Freeman, Elizabeth Allen, Michael Brauer, Oliver Cumming","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00021-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with 83% of ARI mortality occurring in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) before the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to estimate the effect of interventions promoting handwashing with soap on ARI in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Global Health, and Global Index Medicus for studies of handwashing with soap interventions in LMICs from inception to May 25, 2021. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled studies of interventions conducted in domestic, school, or childcare settings. Interventions promoting hand hygiene methods other than handwashing with soap were excluded, as were interventions in health-care facilities or the workplace. The primary outcome was ARI morbidity arising from any pathogen for participants of any age. Secondary outcomes were lower respiratory infection, upper respiratory infection, influenza confirmed by diagnostic test, COVID-19 confirmed by diagnostic test, and all-cause mortality. We extracted relative risks (RRs), using random-effects meta-analysis to analyse study results, and metaregression to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed risk of bias in individual studies using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and assessed the overall body of evidence using a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021231414.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>26 studies with 161 659 participants met inclusion criteria, providing 27 comparisons (21 randomised). Interventions promoting handwashing with soap reduced any ARI compared with no handwashing intervention (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·76-0·90], I<sup>2</sup> 88%; 27 comparisons). Interventions also reduced lower respiratory infections (0·78 [0·64-0·94], I<sup>2</sup> 64%; 12 comparisons) and upper respiratory infections (0·74 [0·59-0·93], I<sup>2</sup> 91%; seven comparisons), but not test-confirmed influenza (0·94 [0·42-2·11], I<sup>2</sup> 90%; three comparisons), test-confirmed COVID-19 (no comparisons), or all-cause mortality (prevalence ratio 0·95 [95% CI 0·71-1·27]; one comparison). For ARI, no heterogeneity covariates were significant at p<0·1 and the GRADE rating was moderate certainty evidence.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Interventions promoting handwashing with soap can reduce ARI in LMICs, and could help to prevent the large burden of respiratory disease.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute, and UK FCDO.</p>","PeriodicalId":18014,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"401 10389","pages":"1681-1690"},"PeriodicalIF":88.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of handwashing with soap for preventing acute respiratory infections in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Ross, Sarah Bick, Philip Ayieko, Robert Dreibelbis, Jennyfer Wolf, Matthew C Freeman, Elizabeth Allen, Michael Brauer, Oliver Cumming\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00021-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with 83% of ARI mortality occurring in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) before the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to estimate the effect of interventions promoting handwashing with soap on ARI in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Global Health, and Global Index Medicus for studies of handwashing with soap interventions in LMICs from inception to May 25, 2021. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled studies of interventions conducted in domestic, school, or childcare settings. Interventions promoting hand hygiene methods other than handwashing with soap were excluded, as were interventions in health-care facilities or the workplace. The primary outcome was ARI morbidity arising from any pathogen for participants of any age. Secondary outcomes were lower respiratory infection, upper respiratory infection, influenza confirmed by diagnostic test, COVID-19 confirmed by diagnostic test, and all-cause mortality. We extracted relative risks (RRs), using random-effects meta-analysis to analyse study results, and metaregression to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed risk of bias in individual studies using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and assessed the overall body of evidence using a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021231414.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>26 studies with 161 659 participants met inclusion criteria, providing 27 comparisons (21 randomised). Interventions promoting handwashing with soap reduced any ARI compared with no handwashing intervention (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·76-0·90], I<sup>2</sup> 88%; 27 comparisons). Interventions also reduced lower respiratory infections (0·78 [0·64-0·94], I<sup>2</sup> 64%; 12 comparisons) and upper respiratory infections (0·74 [0·59-0·93], I<sup>2</sup> 91%; seven comparisons), but not test-confirmed influenza (0·94 [0·42-2·11], I<sup>2</sup> 90%; three comparisons), test-confirmed COVID-19 (no comparisons), or all-cause mortality (prevalence ratio 0·95 [95% CI 0·71-1·27]; one comparison). For ARI, no heterogeneity covariates were significant at p<0·1 and the GRADE rating was moderate certainty evidence.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Interventions promoting handwashing with soap can reduce ARI in LMICs, and could help to prevent the large burden of respiratory disease.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute, and UK FCDO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet\",\"volume\":\"401 10389\",\"pages\":\"1681-1690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":88.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00021-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00021-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:急性呼吸道感染(ARI)是全球发病和死亡的主要原因,在COVID-19大流行之前,83%的ARI死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。我们的目的是评估促进用肥皂洗手的干预措施对中低收入国家急性呼吸道感染的影响。方法:在我们的系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Global Health和Global Index Medicus,以获取从成立到2021年5月25日在低收入国家中使用肥皂洗手干预措施的研究。我们纳入了在家庭、学校或儿童保育环境中进行的干预措施的随机和非随机对照研究。推广除用肥皂洗手以外的其他手卫生方法的干预措施,以及在卫生保健设施或工作场所的干预措施都被排除在外。主要结果是任何年龄的参与者由任何病原体引起的ARI发病率。次要结局为下呼吸道感染、上呼吸道感染、诊断试验确诊的流感、诊断试验确诊的COVID-19和全因死亡率。我们提取相对风险(rr),使用随机效应荟萃分析分析研究结果,并使用元回归评估异质性。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估了个别研究的偏倚风险,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法评估了总体证据。该研究已注册为PROSPERO, CRD42021231414。结果:26项研究16659名参与者符合纳入标准,提供27个比较(21个随机)。与不洗手干预相比,提倡用肥皂洗手的干预措施减少了任何ARI (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.76 - 0.90], I2 88%;27岁的比较)。干预措施也减少了下呼吸道感染(0.78 [0.64 - 0.94],I2 64%;12例比较)和上呼吸道感染(0.74 [0.59 ~ 0.93],I2 91%;7例比较),但未检测确诊流感(0.94 [0.42 - 0.11],I2 90%;3个比较)、检测确诊的COVID-19(无比较)或全因死亡率(患病率0.95 [95% CI 0.71 - 0.27];一个比较)。对于急性呼吸道感染,没有异质性协变量显著解释:促进用肥皂洗手的干预措施可以减少低收入国家的急性呼吸道感染,并有助于预防呼吸道疾病的沉重负担。资助:比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、利洁时全球卫生研究所和英国FCDO。
Effectiveness of handwashing with soap for preventing acute respiratory infections in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with 83% of ARI mortality occurring in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) before the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to estimate the effect of interventions promoting handwashing with soap on ARI in LMICs.
Methods: In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Global Health, and Global Index Medicus for studies of handwashing with soap interventions in LMICs from inception to May 25, 2021. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled studies of interventions conducted in domestic, school, or childcare settings. Interventions promoting hand hygiene methods other than handwashing with soap were excluded, as were interventions in health-care facilities or the workplace. The primary outcome was ARI morbidity arising from any pathogen for participants of any age. Secondary outcomes were lower respiratory infection, upper respiratory infection, influenza confirmed by diagnostic test, COVID-19 confirmed by diagnostic test, and all-cause mortality. We extracted relative risks (RRs), using random-effects meta-analysis to analyse study results, and metaregression to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed risk of bias in individual studies using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and assessed the overall body of evidence using a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021231414.
Findings: 26 studies with 161 659 participants met inclusion criteria, providing 27 comparisons (21 randomised). Interventions promoting handwashing with soap reduced any ARI compared with no handwashing intervention (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·76-0·90], I2 88%; 27 comparisons). Interventions also reduced lower respiratory infections (0·78 [0·64-0·94], I2 64%; 12 comparisons) and upper respiratory infections (0·74 [0·59-0·93], I2 91%; seven comparisons), but not test-confirmed influenza (0·94 [0·42-2·11], I2 90%; three comparisons), test-confirmed COVID-19 (no comparisons), or all-cause mortality (prevalence ratio 0·95 [95% CI 0·71-1·27]; one comparison). For ARI, no heterogeneity covariates were significant at p<0·1 and the GRADE rating was moderate certainty evidence.
Interpretation: Interventions promoting handwashing with soap can reduce ARI in LMICs, and could help to prevent the large burden of respiratory disease.
Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute, and UK FCDO.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet is a world-leading source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It was founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley and has been an independent, international weekly general medical journal since then. The journal has an Impact Factor of 168.9, ranking first among 167 general and internal medicine journals globally. It also has a Scopus CiteScore of 133·2, ranking it second among 830 general medicine journals. The Lancet's mission is to make science widely available to serve and transform society, positively impacting people's lives. Throughout its history, The Lancet has been dedicated to addressing urgent topics, initiating debate, providing context for scientific research, and influencing decision makers worldwide.