医师助理教育计划的先决条件交付方法和学术成果。

Q2 Health Professions
Robyn L Chalupa, Torrance L Nevels, Margaret M Kucia, James J Jones
{"title":"医师助理教育计划的先决条件交付方法和学术成果。","authors":"Robyn L Chalupa, Torrance L Nevels, Margaret M Kucia, James J Jones","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP) educates up to 169 matriculants per year. Each service branch sets the admission criteria, including all prerequisites, for their applicants. We hypothesized that prerequisites obtained online/virtual are less rigorous than coursework completed in-person. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether online/virtual prerequisite courses were associated with academic deceleration or attrition at any point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student self-reported data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate program scores of students who took prerequisites online/virtual or in-person.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in foundational course performance between online/virtual and in-person coursework. In addition, students who took anatomy online performed better than students who completed the coursework in-person (140.6 ± 15.6 vs. 145.6 ± 14.7, P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis indicates that using the prerequisite source to predict academic difficulty may not be possible in IPAP students. Faculty will need to continue to search for other predictors of academic difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prerequisite Delivery Method and Academic Outcomes in a Physician Assistant Education Program.\",\"authors\":\"Robyn L Chalupa, Torrance L Nevels, Margaret M Kucia, James J Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP) educates up to 169 matriculants per year. Each service branch sets the admission criteria, including all prerequisites, for their applicants. We hypothesized that prerequisites obtained online/virtual are less rigorous than coursework completed in-person. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether online/virtual prerequisite courses were associated with academic deceleration or attrition at any point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student self-reported data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate program scores of students who took prerequisites online/virtual or in-person.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in foundational course performance between online/virtual and in-person coursework. In addition, students who took anatomy online performed better than students who completed the coursework in-person (140.6 ± 15.6 vs. 145.6 ± 14.7, P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis indicates that using the prerequisite source to predict academic difficulty may not be possible in IPAP students. Faculty will need to continue to search for other predictors of academic difficulty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:跨部门医师助理计划(IPAP)每年教育多达169名毕业生。每个服务分支机构为其申请人设定入学标准,包括所有先决条件。我们假设在线/虚拟的先决条件不如亲自完成的课程严格。本调查的目的是评估在线/虚拟预修课程在任何时候是否与学业减速或流失有关。方法:回顾性分析学生自我报告的数据,评估在线/虚拟或亲自参加先决条件课程的学生的课程分数。结果:在线/虚拟课程与面对面课程的基础课程成绩无统计学差异。此外,在线学习解剖学的学生比面对面完成课程的学生表现更好(140.6±15.6比145.6±14.7,P = 0.05)。结论:本分析表明,使用先决条件来源来预测IPAP学生的学业困难可能是不可能的。教师们需要继续寻找学业困难的其他预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prerequisite Delivery Method and Academic Outcomes in a Physician Assistant Education Program.

Purpose: The Interservice Physician Assistant Program (IPAP) educates up to 169 matriculants per year. Each service branch sets the admission criteria, including all prerequisites, for their applicants. We hypothesized that prerequisites obtained online/virtual are less rigorous than coursework completed in-person. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether online/virtual prerequisite courses were associated with academic deceleration or attrition at any point.

Methods: Student self-reported data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate program scores of students who took prerequisites online/virtual or in-person.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in foundational course performance between online/virtual and in-person coursework. In addition, students who took anatomy online performed better than students who completed the coursework in-person (140.6 ± 15.6 vs. 145.6 ± 14.7, P = .05).

Conclusions: This analysis indicates that using the prerequisite source to predict academic difficulty may not be possible in IPAP students. Faculty will need to continue to search for other predictors of academic difficulty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信