{"title":"仅使用凡士林纱布和气泡棉修补剂治愈大面积外伤性鼓膜穿孔。","authors":"Huiqin Zong, Zhengcai Lou","doi":"10.1177/01455613221150571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaseline gauze (VG) patching on the treatment of large traumatic perforation of tympanic membrane (TM).Material and methods90 patients with traumatic perforation larger than 25% of the TM were randomly allocated into the control group of observation only, VG group, and Gelfoam patch alone group. The closure rate and closure time among the 3 groups were compared at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 82 large traumatic perforations were analyzed in this study. The closure rates in the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups were 84.6%, 100.0%, and 89.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.637). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference between the control and VG groups was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.047), but the difference wasn't significant between gelfoam alone and control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.699) or VG groups (<i>P</i> = 0.236). The mean closure times were 5.41 ± 1.47, 2.14 ± 0.93, and 3.00 ± 0.62 weeks for the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference was significant between the control and VG groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or gelfoam alone group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or VG and gelfoam groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionsVG improved the closure rate and shortened the closure time compared with observation only, which could be an effective patch material for repairing traumatic lager perforations in the outpatient setting, which is readily available and convenient.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP699-NP705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healing large Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations Using Vaseline Gauze and Gelfoam Patching Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Huiqin Zong, Zhengcai Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613221150571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaseline gauze (VG) patching on the treatment of large traumatic perforation of tympanic membrane (TM).Material and methods90 patients with traumatic perforation larger than 25% of the TM were randomly allocated into the control group of observation only, VG group, and Gelfoam patch alone group. The closure rate and closure time among the 3 groups were compared at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 82 large traumatic perforations were analyzed in this study. The closure rates in the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups were 84.6%, 100.0%, and 89.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.637). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference between the control and VG groups was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.047), but the difference wasn't significant between gelfoam alone and control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.699) or VG groups (<i>P</i> = 0.236). The mean closure times were 5.41 ± 1.47, 2.14 ± 0.93, and 3.00 ± 0.62 weeks for the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference was significant between the control and VG groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or gelfoam alone group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) or VG and gelfoam groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).ConclusionsVG improved the closure rate and shortened the closure time compared with observation only, which could be an effective patch material for repairing traumatic lager perforations in the outpatient setting, which is readily available and convenient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"NP699-NP705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221150571\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221150571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healing large Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations Using Vaseline Gauze and Gelfoam Patching Alone.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaseline gauze (VG) patching on the treatment of large traumatic perforation of tympanic membrane (TM).Material and methods90 patients with traumatic perforation larger than 25% of the TM were randomly allocated into the control group of observation only, VG group, and Gelfoam patch alone group. The closure rate and closure time among the 3 groups were compared at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 82 large traumatic perforations were analyzed in this study. The closure rates in the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups were 84.6%, 100.0%, and 89.3%, respectively (P = 0.637). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference between the control and VG groups was significant (P = 0.047), but the difference wasn't significant between gelfoam alone and control groups (P = 0.699) or VG groups (P = 0.236). The mean closure times were 5.41 ± 1.47, 2.14 ± 0.93, and 3.00 ± 0.62 weeks for the control, VG, and gelfoam patch groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that the difference was significant between the control and VG groups (P < 0.001) or gelfoam alone group (P < 0.001) or VG and gelfoam groups (P < 0.05).ConclusionsVG improved the closure rate and shortened the closure time compared with observation only, which could be an effective patch material for repairing traumatic lager perforations in the outpatient setting, which is readily available and convenient.
期刊介绍:
Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.