糖尿病与居住在长期护理机构的老年人骨微结构不良有关

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Nami Safai Haeri, Mary P Kotlarczyk, Subashan Perera, Susan L Greenspan
{"title":"糖尿病与居住在长期护理机构的老年人骨微结构不良有关","authors":"Nami Safai Haeri,&nbsp;Mary P Kotlarczyk,&nbsp;Subashan Perera,&nbsp;Susan L Greenspan","doi":"10.1155/2022/2522014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporosis are very common in older adults who reside in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the relationship between diabetes and bone quality in this population. The purpose of this study is to determine if bone mineral density (BMD) or trabecular bone score (TBS) is a better measure of bone quality and skeletal health, in LTC residents with and without a history of DM. <i>Methodology</i>. In this longitudinal cohort study, we examined baseline BMD (lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck), TBS, DM, and functional status in 511 LTC residents who were enrolled in two ongoing randomized placebo-controlled osteoporosis clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, participants were older than 80 years and majority were prefrail or frail. Women with DM had greater lumbar spine BMD (1.106 vs 1.017, adjusted difference ± standard error = 0.084 ± 0.023 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) and femoral neck BMD (0.695 vs 0.651, 0.027 ± 0.013 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0463), but lesser lumbar spine TBS (1.211 vs 1.266, -0.036 ± 0.016, <i>p</i> = 0.0299) compared to women without DM. Total hip BMD was also higher based on descriptive statistics (0.780 vs 0.734, <i>p</i> = 0.6255) in diabetic women, although the difference was not statistically significant. Men had similar but attenuated findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among LTC residents, those with DM have greater BMD but lower bone quality measured by TBS. TBS should be considered in assessing older patients with DM. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings with respect to fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792231/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes Mellitus is Associated with Poor Bone Microarchitecture in Older Adults Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Nami Safai Haeri,&nbsp;Mary P Kotlarczyk,&nbsp;Subashan Perera,&nbsp;Susan L Greenspan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/2522014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporosis are very common in older adults who reside in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the relationship between diabetes and bone quality in this population. The purpose of this study is to determine if bone mineral density (BMD) or trabecular bone score (TBS) is a better measure of bone quality and skeletal health, in LTC residents with and without a history of DM. <i>Methodology</i>. In this longitudinal cohort study, we examined baseline BMD (lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck), TBS, DM, and functional status in 511 LTC residents who were enrolled in two ongoing randomized placebo-controlled osteoporosis clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, participants were older than 80 years and majority were prefrail or frail. Women with DM had greater lumbar spine BMD (1.106 vs 1.017, adjusted difference ± standard error = 0.084 ± 0.023 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) and femoral neck BMD (0.695 vs 0.651, 0.027 ± 0.013 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0463), but lesser lumbar spine TBS (1.211 vs 1.266, -0.036 ± 0.016, <i>p</i> = 0.0299) compared to women without DM. Total hip BMD was also higher based on descriptive statistics (0.780 vs 0.734, <i>p</i> = 0.6255) in diabetic women, although the difference was not statistically significant. Men had similar but attenuated findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among LTC residents, those with DM have greater BMD but lower bone quality measured by TBS. TBS should be considered in assessing older patients with DM. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings with respect to fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2522014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2522014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:糖尿病(DM)和骨质疏松症在居住在长期护理(LTC)设施的老年人中非常常见。然而,很少有研究调查糖尿病与这一人群骨质量之间的关系。本研究的目的是确定骨矿物质密度(BMD)或骨小梁评分(TBS)是否能更好地衡量有或没有糖尿病病史的LTC居民的骨质量和骨骼健康。在这项纵向队列研究中,我们检查了511名LTC患者的基线BMD(腰椎、全髋关节和股骨颈)、TBS、DM和功能状态,这些患者参加了两项正在进行的随机安慰剂对照骨质疏松症临床试验。结果:参与者的平均年龄在80岁以上,大多数是体弱或虚弱。DM的女性有更大的腰椎BMD (1.106 vs 1.017,调整不同±标准错误= 0.084±0.023克/厘米2,p = 0.0003)和股骨颈骨密度(0.695 vs 0.651, 0.027±0.013克/厘米2,p = 0.0463),但较轻的腰椎TBS (1.211 vs 1.266, -0.036±0.016,p = 0.0299)相比,女性没有DM。全髋关节骨密度也更高的基于描述性统计(0.780 vs 0.734, p = 0.6255)在糖尿病的女性,虽然差异无统计学意义。男性也有类似的结果,但效果较弱。结论:在LTC居民中,糖尿病患者的骨密度更高,但TBS测量的骨质量较低。在评估老年糖尿病患者时应考虑TBS。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实有关骨折的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes Mellitus is Associated with Poor Bone Microarchitecture in Older Adults Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities.

Objectives: Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporosis are very common in older adults who reside in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the relationship between diabetes and bone quality in this population. The purpose of this study is to determine if bone mineral density (BMD) or trabecular bone score (TBS) is a better measure of bone quality and skeletal health, in LTC residents with and without a history of DM. Methodology. In this longitudinal cohort study, we examined baseline BMD (lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck), TBS, DM, and functional status in 511 LTC residents who were enrolled in two ongoing randomized placebo-controlled osteoporosis clinical trials.

Results: On average, participants were older than 80 years and majority were prefrail or frail. Women with DM had greater lumbar spine BMD (1.106 vs 1.017, adjusted difference ± standard error = 0.084 ± 0.023 g/cm2, p = 0.0003) and femoral neck BMD (0.695 vs 0.651, 0.027 ± 0.013 g/cm2, p = 0.0463), but lesser lumbar spine TBS (1.211 vs 1.266, -0.036 ± 0.016, p = 0.0299) compared to women without DM. Total hip BMD was also higher based on descriptive statistics (0.780 vs 0.734, p = 0.6255) in diabetic women, although the difference was not statistically significant. Men had similar but attenuated findings.

Conclusions: Among LTC residents, those with DM have greater BMD but lower bone quality measured by TBS. TBS should be considered in assessing older patients with DM. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings with respect to fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信