Felice Lorusso, Gianluca Tartaglia, Francesco Inchingolo, Antonio Scarano
{"title":"含有0.5% A.D.S.、PVP-VA和DNA钠的氯胺定凝胶与安慰剂凝胶治疗种植体周围粘膜炎:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Felice Lorusso, Gianluca Tartaglia, Francesco Inchingolo, Antonio Scarano","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1404030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peri-implant mucositis is a bacterial and inflammatory disease of implant surrounding soft tissues. Chlorhexidine (CHX) associated with PVP-VA (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate) has an adjuvant function in the antibacterial activity: it protects the film-forming layer, due to polymer, from microbial contamination or over-infection, and prolongs its permanence, without a direct action on the tissues and wounds. Sodium DNA is able to improve gingival trophism. The aim of the study was to compare a gel with CHX and antidiscoloration system (A.D.S.) 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA with a placebo gel without chlorexidine in peri-implant mucositis treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trial design: A single center randomized controlled pilot clinical trial was conducted on a total of 24 patients with mucositis, randomly allocated into two groups. In the group (A) (n = 12) patients were treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% while a placebo gel was used in the group (B) (n = 12).</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Plaque Index (PI) (primary outcome), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Gingival Index (GI) (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks after treatment period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean PI score recorded at baseline was 2.4 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -2.682/7.482] in the group (A) and 2.2 ± 0.5 [95% CI: -4.153/8.553] in the group (B) (<i>p</i> > 0.05) while mean PI score at 2 weeks was 0.5 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -4.582/5.582] and 1.7 ± 1.9 [95% CI: -9.736/13.14] in the group and in the group respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Mean BOP value at baseline was 57.1 ± 15.2% [95% CI: -136.0/250.2] in the group (A) and 55.3% ± 11.7% [95% CI: -93.36/204.0] (<i>p</i> > 0.05) while mean BOP value at 2 weeks follow-up was 14.3% ± 6.6% [95% CI: -69.56/98.16] (A) and 45.4% ± 9.8% [95% CI: -79.12/169.9] (B) respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant reduction in gingival inflammation indexes was found at 2 weeks in patients with peri-implant mucositis treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA compared to those treated with a placebo gel.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>2019-004976-20.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":"14 4","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment with a Chlorexidine Gel with A.D.S. 0.5%, PVP-VA and Sodium DNA vs a Placebo Gel: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Felice Lorusso, Gianluca Tartaglia, Francesco Inchingolo, Antonio Scarano\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.fbe1404030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peri-implant mucositis is a bacterial and inflammatory disease of implant surrounding soft tissues. Chlorhexidine (CHX) associated with PVP-VA (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate) has an adjuvant function in the antibacterial activity: it protects the film-forming layer, due to polymer, from microbial contamination or over-infection, and prolongs its permanence, without a direct action on the tissues and wounds. Sodium DNA is able to improve gingival trophism. The aim of the study was to compare a gel with CHX and antidiscoloration system (A.D.S.) 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA with a placebo gel without chlorexidine in peri-implant mucositis treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trial design: A single center randomized controlled pilot clinical trial was conducted on a total of 24 patients with mucositis, randomly allocated into two groups. In the group (A) (n = 12) patients were treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% while a placebo gel was used in the group (B) (n = 12).</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Plaque Index (PI) (primary outcome), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Gingival Index (GI) (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks after treatment period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean PI score recorded at baseline was 2.4 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -2.682/7.482] in the group (A) and 2.2 ± 0.5 [95% CI: -4.153/8.553] in the group (B) (<i>p</i> > 0.05) while mean PI score at 2 weeks was 0.5 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -4.582/5.582] and 1.7 ± 1.9 [95% CI: -9.736/13.14] in the group and in the group respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Mean BOP value at baseline was 57.1 ± 15.2% [95% CI: -136.0/250.2] in the group (A) and 55.3% ± 11.7% [95% CI: -93.36/204.0] (<i>p</i> > 0.05) while mean BOP value at 2 weeks follow-up was 14.3% ± 6.6% [95% CI: -69.56/98.16] (A) and 45.4% ± 9.8% [95% CI: -79.12/169.9] (B) respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant reduction in gingival inflammation indexes was found at 2 weeks in patients with peri-implant mucositis treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA compared to those treated with a placebo gel.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>2019-004976-20.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1404030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1404030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment with a Chlorexidine Gel with A.D.S. 0.5%, PVP-VA and Sodium DNA vs a Placebo Gel: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial.
Background: Peri-implant mucositis is a bacterial and inflammatory disease of implant surrounding soft tissues. Chlorhexidine (CHX) associated with PVP-VA (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate) has an adjuvant function in the antibacterial activity: it protects the film-forming layer, due to polymer, from microbial contamination or over-infection, and prolongs its permanence, without a direct action on the tissues and wounds. Sodium DNA is able to improve gingival trophism. The aim of the study was to compare a gel with CHX and antidiscoloration system (A.D.S.) 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA with a placebo gel without chlorexidine in peri-implant mucositis treatment.
Methods: Trial design: A single center randomized controlled pilot clinical trial was conducted on a total of 24 patients with mucositis, randomly allocated into two groups. In the group (A) (n = 12) patients were treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% while a placebo gel was used in the group (B) (n = 12).
Outcome: Plaque Index (PI) (primary outcome), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Gingival Index (GI) (secondary outcomes) were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks after treatment period.
Results: Mean PI score recorded at baseline was 2.4 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -2.682/7.482] in the group (A) and 2.2 ± 0.5 [95% CI: -4.153/8.553] in the group (B) (p > 0.05) while mean PI score at 2 weeks was 0.5 ± 0.4 [95% CI: -4.582/5.582] and 1.7 ± 1.9 [95% CI: -9.736/13.14] in the group and in the group respectively (p < 0.05). Mean BOP value at baseline was 57.1 ± 15.2% [95% CI: -136.0/250.2] in the group (A) and 55.3% ± 11.7% [95% CI: -93.36/204.0] (p > 0.05) while mean BOP value at 2 weeks follow-up was 14.3% ± 6.6% [95% CI: -69.56/98.16] (A) and 45.4% ± 9.8% [95% CI: -79.12/169.9] (B) respectively (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: A significant reduction in gingival inflammation indexes was found at 2 weeks in patients with peri-implant mucositis treated with a gel with CHX + A.D.S. 0.5% with the addition of PVP-VA and sodium DNA compared to those treated with a placebo gel.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
