父亲和母亲的出生体重与足月妊娠后代罹患巨大儿的风险:全国人口研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1111/ppe.13005
Svein Rasmussen, Ellen Øen Carlsen, Lorentz Erland Linde, Nils-Halvdan Morken, Siri Eldevik Håberg, Cathrine Ebbing
{"title":"父亲和母亲的出生体重与足月妊娠后代罹患巨大儿的风险:全国人口研究。","authors":"Svein Rasmussen, Ellen Øen Carlsen, Lorentz Erland Linde, Nils-Halvdan Morken, Siri Eldevik Håberg, Cathrine Ebbing","doi":"10.1111/ppe.13005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of data on whether parents' macrosomia (birthweight ≥4500 g) status influences the risk of macrosomia in the offspring. The role of maternal overweight in the generational effect of macrosomia is not known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of macrosomia by parental birthweight at term and evaluate if this risk varied with maternal body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) early in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway on all singleton term births (37-42 gestational weeks) during 1967-2017. The primary exposure was parental macrosomia, and the outcome was macrosomia in the second generation. The secondary exposure was maternal BMI. We used binomial regression to calculate relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed potential unmeasured confounding and selection bias using a probabilistic bias analysis and performed analyses with and without imputation for variables with missing values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data included 647,957 singleton parent-offspring trios born at term. The prevalence of macrosomia was 3.2% (n = 41,396) in the parental generation and 4.0% (n = 25,673) in the offspring generation. Macrosomia in parents was associated with an increased risk of macrosomia in offspring, with the RR for both parents were born macrosomic being 6.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.31, 8.05), only mother macrosomic 3.37 (95% CI 3.17, 3.57) and only father macrosomic RR 2.22 (95% CI 2.12, 2.33). These risks increased by maternal BMI in early pregnancy: if both parents were born macrosomic, 17% of infants were macrosomic among mothers with normal BMI. If both parents were macrosomic and the mothers were obese, 31% of offspring were macrosomic. Macrosomia-related adverse outcomes did not differ with parental macrosomia status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents' weight at birth and maternal BMI appear to be strongly associated with macrosomia in the offspring delivered at term gestations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paternal and maternal birthweight and offspring risk of macrosomia at term gestations: A nationwide population study.\",\"authors\":\"Svein Rasmussen, Ellen Øen Carlsen, Lorentz Erland Linde, Nils-Halvdan Morken, Siri Eldevik Håberg, Cathrine Ebbing\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.13005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of data on whether parents' macrosomia (birthweight ≥4500 g) status influences the risk of macrosomia in the offspring. The role of maternal overweight in the generational effect of macrosomia is not known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risk of macrosomia by parental birthweight at term and evaluate if this risk varied with maternal body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) early in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway on all singleton term births (37-42 gestational weeks) during 1967-2017. The primary exposure was parental macrosomia, and the outcome was macrosomia in the second generation. The secondary exposure was maternal BMI. We used binomial regression to calculate relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed potential unmeasured confounding and selection bias using a probabilistic bias analysis and performed analyses with and without imputation for variables with missing values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data included 647,957 singleton parent-offspring trios born at term. The prevalence of macrosomia was 3.2% (n = 41,396) in the parental generation and 4.0% (n = 25,673) in the offspring generation. Macrosomia in parents was associated with an increased risk of macrosomia in offspring, with the RR for both parents were born macrosomic being 6.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.31, 8.05), only mother macrosomic 3.37 (95% CI 3.17, 3.57) and only father macrosomic RR 2.22 (95% CI 2.12, 2.33). These risks increased by maternal BMI in early pregnancy: if both parents were born macrosomic, 17% of infants were macrosomic among mothers with normal BMI. If both parents were macrosomic and the mothers were obese, 31% of offspring were macrosomic. Macrosomia-related adverse outcomes did not differ with parental macrosomia status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents' weight at birth and maternal BMI appear to be strongly associated with macrosomia in the offspring delivered at term gestations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于父母的巨型畸形(出生体重≥4500克)状况是否会影响后代患巨型畸形的风险,目前还缺乏相关数据。母体超重在巨型畸形代际效应中的作用尚不清楚:目的:根据父母足月时的出生体重估算巨型畸形的风险,并评估这一风险是否会随着孕早期母体体重指数(BMI,kg/m2)的变化而变化:我们使用了挪威出生医学登记处(Medical Birth Registry of Norway)提供的数据,这些数据来自1967-2017年期间的所有单胎足月产(37-42孕周)。主要暴露是父母的巨大儿症,结果是第二代的巨大儿症。次要暴露是母亲的体重指数。我们使用二项回归计算相对风险 (RR),并得出 95% 的置信区间。我们使用概率偏倚分析评估了潜在的未测量混杂因素和选择偏倚,并对缺失值变量进行了估算和未估算分析:数据包括 647 957 例足月出生的单胎父母-后代三胞胎。父母一代的巨大儿发生率为 3.2%(n = 41,396 例),子一代的巨大儿发生率为 4.0%(n = 25,673 例)。父母的巨型畸形与后代的巨型畸形风险增加有关,父母均为巨型畸形的RR为6.53(95%置信区间[CI] 5.31-8.05),只有母亲为巨型畸形的RR为3.37(95%置信区间[CI] 3.17-3.57),只有父亲为巨型畸形的RR为2.22(95%置信区间[CI] 2.12-2.33)。这些风险随着孕早期母亲体重指数(BMI)的增加而增加:如果父母双方都是巨婴,在体重指数正常的母亲中,17%的婴儿是巨婴。如果父母双方都是巨型儿,而母亲肥胖,则有 31% 的后代是巨型儿。与巨大儿相关的不良后果与父母的巨大儿状况没有差异:父母出生时的体重和母亲的体重指数似乎与足月妊娠分娩的后代的巨大儿症密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paternal and maternal birthweight and offspring risk of macrosomia at term gestations: A nationwide population study.

Background: There is a paucity of data on whether parents' macrosomia (birthweight ≥4500 g) status influences the risk of macrosomia in the offspring. The role of maternal overweight in the generational effect of macrosomia is not known.

Objective: To estimate the risk of macrosomia by parental birthweight at term and evaluate if this risk varied with maternal body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) early in pregnancy.

Methods: We used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway on all singleton term births (37-42 gestational weeks) during 1967-2017. The primary exposure was parental macrosomia, and the outcome was macrosomia in the second generation. The secondary exposure was maternal BMI. We used binomial regression to calculate relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed potential unmeasured confounding and selection bias using a probabilistic bias analysis and performed analyses with and without imputation for variables with missing values.

Results: The data included 647,957 singleton parent-offspring trios born at term. The prevalence of macrosomia was 3.2% (n = 41,396) in the parental generation and 4.0% (n = 25,673) in the offspring generation. Macrosomia in parents was associated with an increased risk of macrosomia in offspring, with the RR for both parents were born macrosomic being 6.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.31, 8.05), only mother macrosomic 3.37 (95% CI 3.17, 3.57) and only father macrosomic RR 2.22 (95% CI 2.12, 2.33). These risks increased by maternal BMI in early pregnancy: if both parents were born macrosomic, 17% of infants were macrosomic among mothers with normal BMI. If both parents were macrosomic and the mothers were obese, 31% of offspring were macrosomic. Macrosomia-related adverse outcomes did not differ with parental macrosomia status.

Conclusions: Parents' weight at birth and maternal BMI appear to be strongly associated with macrosomia in the offspring delivered at term gestations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信