{"title":"对 Chachula 和 Ahmad(2022 年)的更正。","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/tra0001558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Professional quality of life, stress, and trauma in nursing students: Before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic\" by Kathryn M. Chachula and Nora Ahmad (<i>Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy</i>, 2022[Nov], Vol 14[8], 1333-1337). In the article, the values 7.6% and 1.2% were changed to 19.1% and 2.9%, respectively, in the following text in the second paragraph of the \"Comparisons Pre-Pandemic and amid the Pandemic\" section of the Results: \"exploration of the frequencies revealed that fewer students reported high levels of CS during the pandemic (19.1%) than prior (24.7%) and 2.9% of students reported high levels of STS compared to 0% the year prior.\" In addition, the percentages listed in the \"During Pandemic\" section of Table 4 were incorrectly reported and have been amended. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the overall results remains unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-27230-001).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the levels of stress, burnout, primary and secondary trauma, and self-efficacy before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic in a sample of baccalaureate nursing and psychiatric nursing students, a population which has seldom been studied regarding these factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used a nonexperimental, cross-sectional methodology at 2 time-points. Nursing and psychiatric nursing students enrolled at 1 western Canadian university were invited to participate in an online, anonymous survey in 2020 prior to the pandemic and in 2021 during Canada's third-wave. Survey measures included the Professional Quality of Life Scale (includes Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress), the Perceived Stress Scale, the Life Events Checklist to assess the amount of prior traumatic experiences, and the Core Self-Evaluations Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically higher significant differences in prior traumatic experiences measured by the Life Events Checklist were found in the midpandemic cohort in comparison to the prepandemic 2020 student cohort (<i>t</i>(159) = -2.32, <i>p</i> < .05, 95% CI [-2.23, -.18]). Strong correlated relationships were found in many of the study variables (ranging from <i>r</i> = .301 to -.745, <i>p</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary study is the first to reveal that students in the nursing field experienced more traumatic events during the pandemic than before. The findings imply that access to greater support for experiences of trauma may be needed to support undergraduate students entering the health care arena amid the novel coronavirus pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to Chachula and Ahmad (2022).\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reports an error in \\\"Professional quality of life, stress, and trauma in nursing students: Before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic\\\" by Kathryn M. Chachula and Nora Ahmad (<i>Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy</i>, 2022[Nov], Vol 14[8], 1333-1337). In the article, the values 7.6% and 1.2% were changed to 19.1% and 2.9%, respectively, in the following text in the second paragraph of the \\\"Comparisons Pre-Pandemic and amid the Pandemic\\\" section of the Results: \\\"exploration of the frequencies revealed that fewer students reported high levels of CS during the pandemic (19.1%) than prior (24.7%) and 2.9% of students reported high levels of STS compared to 0% the year prior.\\\" In addition, the percentages listed in the \\\"During Pandemic\\\" section of Table 4 were incorrectly reported and have been amended. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the overall results remains unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-27230-001).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the levels of stress, burnout, primary and secondary trauma, and self-efficacy before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic in a sample of baccalaureate nursing and psychiatric nursing students, a population which has seldom been studied regarding these factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used a nonexperimental, cross-sectional methodology at 2 time-points. Nursing and psychiatric nursing students enrolled at 1 western Canadian university were invited to participate in an online, anonymous survey in 2020 prior to the pandemic and in 2021 during Canada's third-wave. Survey measures included the Professional Quality of Life Scale (includes Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress), the Perceived Stress Scale, the Life Events Checklist to assess the amount of prior traumatic experiences, and the Core Self-Evaluations Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically higher significant differences in prior traumatic experiences measured by the Life Events Checklist were found in the midpandemic cohort in comparison to the prepandemic 2020 student cohort (<i>t</i>(159) = -2.32, <i>p</i> < .05, 95% CI [-2.23, -.18]). Strong correlated relationships were found in many of the study variables (ranging from <i>r</i> = .301 to -.745, <i>p</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary study is the first to reveal that students in the nursing field experienced more traumatic events during the pandemic than before. The findings imply that access to greater support for experiences of trauma may be needed to support undergraduate students entering the health care arena amid the novel coronavirus pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001558\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Kathryn M. Chachula 和 Nora Ahmad 所著的《护理专业学生的职业生活质量、压力和创伤:Kathryn M. Chachula 和 Nora Ahmad 撰写的 "新型冠状病毒大流行之前和期间护理专业学生的职业生活质量、压力和创伤:新型冠状病毒大流行之前和期间"(《心理创伤》:理论、研究、实践与政策》,2022 年 11 月,第 14 卷[8],1333-1337 页)。在文章中,"结果 "部分 "大流行前和大流行中的比较 "第二段中的以下文字分别将 7.6%和 1.2%改为 19.1%和 2.9%:"对频率的探索显示,在大流行期间,报告 CS 高水平的学生(19.1%)少于之前(24.7%),报告 STS 高水平的学生占 2.9%,而前一年为 0%"。此外,表 4 "大流行期间 "部分列出的百分比报告有误,现已修改。不过,对总体结果的解释保持不变。本文网络版已作更正。(原文摘要如下,载于 2022-27230-001 号记录):本研究旨在评估新型冠状病毒大流行之前和期间,本科护理和精神科护理学生样本的压力、职业倦怠、原发性和继发性创伤以及自我效能感的水平:研究采用非实验、横断面方法,分两个时间点进行。加拿大西部一所大学的护理和精神科护理专业学生应邀参加了 2020 年大流行前和 2021 年加拿大第三次大流行期间的在线匿名调查。调查措施包括职业生活质量量表(包括同情心满意度、职业倦怠和继发性创伤压力)、感知压力量表、评估先前创伤经历量的生活事件核对表以及核心自我评价量表:与 2020 年大流行前的学生队列相比,大流行中期的学生队列在通过生活事件清单测量的先前创伤经历方面存在更大的差异(t(159) = -2.32,p < .05,95% CI [-2.23, -.18])。在许多研究变量中发现了强烈的相关关系(范围从 r = .301 到 -.745,p ≤ .001):这项初步研究首次揭示了护理专业学生在大流行病期间经历了比以往更多的创伤事件。研究结果表明,在新型冠状病毒大流行期间,可能需要为进入医疗保健领域的本科生提供更多的创伤体验支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
Reports an error in "Professional quality of life, stress, and trauma in nursing students: Before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic" by Kathryn M. Chachula and Nora Ahmad (Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2022[Nov], Vol 14[8], 1333-1337). In the article, the values 7.6% and 1.2% were changed to 19.1% and 2.9%, respectively, in the following text in the second paragraph of the "Comparisons Pre-Pandemic and amid the Pandemic" section of the Results: "exploration of the frequencies revealed that fewer students reported high levels of CS during the pandemic (19.1%) than prior (24.7%) and 2.9% of students reported high levels of STS compared to 0% the year prior." In addition, the percentages listed in the "During Pandemic" section of Table 4 were incorrectly reported and have been amended. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the overall results remains unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-27230-001).
Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the levels of stress, burnout, primary and secondary trauma, and self-efficacy before and during the novel coronavirus pandemic in a sample of baccalaureate nursing and psychiatric nursing students, a population which has seldom been studied regarding these factors.
Method: The study used a nonexperimental, cross-sectional methodology at 2 time-points. Nursing and psychiatric nursing students enrolled at 1 western Canadian university were invited to participate in an online, anonymous survey in 2020 prior to the pandemic and in 2021 during Canada's third-wave. Survey measures included the Professional Quality of Life Scale (includes Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress), the Perceived Stress Scale, the Life Events Checklist to assess the amount of prior traumatic experiences, and the Core Self-Evaluations Scale.
Results: Statistically higher significant differences in prior traumatic experiences measured by the Life Events Checklist were found in the midpandemic cohort in comparison to the prepandemic 2020 student cohort (t(159) = -2.32, p < .05, 95% CI [-2.23, -.18]). Strong correlated relationships were found in many of the study variables (ranging from r = .301 to -.745, p ≤ .001).
Conclusion: This preliminary study is the first to reveal that students in the nursing field experienced more traumatic events during the pandemic than before. The findings imply that access to greater support for experiences of trauma may be needed to support undergraduate students entering the health care arena amid the novel coronavirus pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence