神经安全技术对单侧保留神经的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中性功能的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mirjam Naomi Mohr, Annemarie Uhlig, Hannah Maria Ploeger, Oliver Hahn, Lutz Trojan, Mathias Reichert
{"title":"神经安全技术对单侧保留神经的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中性功能的影响。","authors":"Mirjam Naomi Mohr,&nbsp;Annemarie Uhlig,&nbsp;Hannah Maria Ploeger,&nbsp;Oliver Hahn,&nbsp;Lutz Trojan,&nbsp;Mathias Reichert","doi":"10.2340/sju.v58.6234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the surgical influence of secondary resection on sexual function in finally unilateral nerve-sparing robot- assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALPs) performed with the 'neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination' (NeuroSAFE) technique by prospectively collecting EPIC-26-questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>Sexual function status measured by the sexual-symptom-score (SexSS) in the EPIC-26-questionnaires was collected preoperatively and 12 months after RALP from 378 patients between 09/2019 and 04/2021. Cohorts of interest were defined as those patients undergoing unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection of the other neurovascular bundle (NVB), and as those patients undergoing primarily planned and successful unilateral nerve-sparing (unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection) in ≤cT2 prostate cancer. NeuroSAFE frozen section technique was performed in all nerve-sparing RALPs, and in case of cancer-positive surgical margins, the complete NVB was resected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 109 RALPs with unilateral nerve-sparing (48 primarily vs. 61 by secondary resection), analyses showed a significant difference in postoperative SexSS for 'unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection' compared with 'unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection' (43 [interquartile range (IQR): 14;50] vs. 26 [IQR: 22;62], P = 0.04). In multivariable analyses, the preoperative SexSS was predictive for postoperative erectile dysfunction (OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98, P < 0.001). Oncological safety was not compromised by secondary resection (prostate-specific antigen after 12 months 0.01 ng/mL vs. 0.01 ng/mL [P = 0.3] for unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection vs. unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that nerve-sparing attempts applying the NeuroSAFEtechnique should be generously performed since a unilateral complete secondary resection leading to a unilateral nerve-sparing RALP did not seem to have a negative influence on sexual function and did not seem to compromise oncological safety compared with primarily performed and successful unilateral nerve-sparing RALP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of secondary resection using NeuroSAFE-technique on sexual function in unilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies.\",\"authors\":\"Mirjam Naomi Mohr,&nbsp;Annemarie Uhlig,&nbsp;Hannah Maria Ploeger,&nbsp;Oliver Hahn,&nbsp;Lutz Trojan,&nbsp;Mathias Reichert\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/sju.v58.6234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the surgical influence of secondary resection on sexual function in finally unilateral nerve-sparing robot- assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALPs) performed with the 'neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination' (NeuroSAFE) technique by prospectively collecting EPIC-26-questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Material & methods: </strong>Sexual function status measured by the sexual-symptom-score (SexSS) in the EPIC-26-questionnaires was collected preoperatively and 12 months after RALP from 378 patients between 09/2019 and 04/2021. Cohorts of interest were defined as those patients undergoing unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection of the other neurovascular bundle (NVB), and as those patients undergoing primarily planned and successful unilateral nerve-sparing (unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection) in ≤cT2 prostate cancer. NeuroSAFE frozen section technique was performed in all nerve-sparing RALPs, and in case of cancer-positive surgical margins, the complete NVB was resected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 109 RALPs with unilateral nerve-sparing (48 primarily vs. 61 by secondary resection), analyses showed a significant difference in postoperative SexSS for 'unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection' compared with 'unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection' (43 [interquartile range (IQR): 14;50] vs. 26 [IQR: 22;62], P = 0.04). In multivariable analyses, the preoperative SexSS was predictive for postoperative erectile dysfunction (OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98, P < 0.001). Oncological safety was not compromised by secondary resection (prostate-specific antigen after 12 months 0.01 ng/mL vs. 0.01 ng/mL [P = 0.3] for unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection vs. unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that nerve-sparing attempts applying the NeuroSAFEtechnique should be generously performed since a unilateral complete secondary resection leading to a unilateral nerve-sparing RALP did not seem to have a negative influence on sexual function and did not seem to compromise oncological safety compared with primarily performed and successful unilateral nerve-sparing RALP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.6234\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.6234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过对epic -26问卷的前瞻性收集,探讨保留神经的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALPs)中二次切除对性功能的影响。材料与方法:收集2019年9月至2021年4月期间378例患者术前和RALP后12个月的性功能状况,采用epic -26问卷中的性症状评分(SexSS)进行测量。感兴趣的队列定义为那些通过二次切除其他神经血管束(NVB)进行单侧神经保留的患者,以及那些在≤cT2前列腺癌中进行主要计划和成功的单侧神经保留(单侧神经保留而不进行二次切除)的患者。所有保留神经的ralp均采用NeuroSAFE冷冻切片技术,如果手术切缘呈癌阳性,则全部切除NVB。结果:在109例保留单侧神经的ralp中(48例主要保留单侧神经,61例经二次切除),分析显示“经二次切除保留单侧神经”与“不经二次切除保留单侧神经”的术后SexSS有显著差异(43例[四分位间距(IQR): 14;50]对26例[IQR: 22;62], P = 0.04)。在多变量分析中,术前的SexSS可以预测术后勃起功能障碍(OR = 0.96, 95%可信区间:0.93-0.98,P < 0.001)。肿瘤安全性不受二次切除的影响(12个月后前列腺特异性抗原0.01 ng/mL vs. 0.01 ng/mL [P = 0.3],单侧神经保留经二次切除vs.单侧神经保留不经二次切除)。结论:本研究的结果表明,应用神经安全技术的神经保留尝试应该大量进行,因为与主要实施和成功的单侧神经保留RALP相比,单侧完全二次切除导致单侧神经保留RALP似乎没有对性功能产生负面影响,并且似乎没有损害肿瘤安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of secondary resection using NeuroSAFE-technique on sexual function in unilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies.

Objective: To demonstrate the surgical influence of secondary resection on sexual function in finally unilateral nerve-sparing robot- assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALPs) performed with the 'neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination' (NeuroSAFE) technique by prospectively collecting EPIC-26-questionnaires.

Material & methods: Sexual function status measured by the sexual-symptom-score (SexSS) in the EPIC-26-questionnaires was collected preoperatively and 12 months after RALP from 378 patients between 09/2019 and 04/2021. Cohorts of interest were defined as those patients undergoing unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection of the other neurovascular bundle (NVB), and as those patients undergoing primarily planned and successful unilateral nerve-sparing (unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection) in ≤cT2 prostate cancer. NeuroSAFE frozen section technique was performed in all nerve-sparing RALPs, and in case of cancer-positive surgical margins, the complete NVB was resected.

Results: In 109 RALPs with unilateral nerve-sparing (48 primarily vs. 61 by secondary resection), analyses showed a significant difference in postoperative SexSS for 'unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection' compared with 'unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection' (43 [interquartile range (IQR): 14;50] vs. 26 [IQR: 22;62], P = 0.04). In multivariable analyses, the preoperative SexSS was predictive for postoperative erectile dysfunction (OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98, P < 0.001). Oncological safety was not compromised by secondary resection (prostate-specific antigen after 12 months 0.01 ng/mL vs. 0.01 ng/mL [P = 0.3] for unilateral nerve-sparing by secondary resection vs. unilateral nerve-sparing without secondary resection).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that nerve-sparing attempts applying the NeuroSAFEtechnique should be generously performed since a unilateral complete secondary resection leading to a unilateral nerve-sparing RALP did not seem to have a negative influence on sexual function and did not seem to compromise oncological safety compared with primarily performed and successful unilateral nerve-sparing RALP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信