根据欧洲肿瘤医学学会2020年风险分层评估阴道近距离放疗治疗早期子宫内膜癌

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Duygu Cebecik Özmüş, Zeliha Güzelöz, Muzaffer Şancı
{"title":"根据欧洲肿瘤医学学会2020年风险分层评估阴道近距离放疗治疗早期子宫内膜癌","authors":"Duygu Cebecik Özmüş,&nbsp;Zeliha Güzelöz,&nbsp;Muzaffer Şancı","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.47835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate vaginal brachytherapy (VB) after surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients with Stage I-II endometrial adeno-cancer operated between 1998 and 2018 and whose adjuvant therapies had been arranged were evaluated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 618 patients were enrolled. In 409 patients in the low-risk group, the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were found to be higher in the VB group. When the results of 112 patients in the intermediate-risk group were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distance metastasis rates. In 89 patients in the intermediate-high risk group, vaginal recurrence rates were 0%, 4.8%, 0%, and 25% for VB, external beam radiotherapy, combination radiotherapy, and the follow-up groups, respectively (p=0.010), and pelvic recurrence rates were found to be 18.2%, 0%, 1.9% and 0% (p=0.036). Distant metastasis rates were 0%, 0%, 9.6% and 0% (p=0.229). When the overall survival in all groups was examined, no significant difference was found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, no adjuvant treatment is a proper approach for low-risk patients. Brachytherapy can be considered a suitable option for the intermediate risk group. Combined treatments instead of VB in the high-intermediate risk group would be preferred in terms of local control.</p>","PeriodicalId":45340,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"19 4","pages":"308-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/14/TJOG-19-308.PMC9748865.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of vaginal brachytherapy for treating early-stage endometrial cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology 2020 risk stratification.\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Cebecik Özmüş,&nbsp;Zeliha Güzelöz,&nbsp;Muzaffer Şancı\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.47835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to evaluate vaginal brachytherapy (VB) after surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients with Stage I-II endometrial adeno-cancer operated between 1998 and 2018 and whose adjuvant therapies had been arranged were evaluated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 618 patients were enrolled. In 409 patients in the low-risk group, the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were found to be higher in the VB group. When the results of 112 patients in the intermediate-risk group were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distance metastasis rates. In 89 patients in the intermediate-high risk group, vaginal recurrence rates were 0%, 4.8%, 0%, and 25% for VB, external beam radiotherapy, combination radiotherapy, and the follow-up groups, respectively (p=0.010), and pelvic recurrence rates were found to be 18.2%, 0%, 1.9% and 0% (p=0.036). Distant metastasis rates were 0%, 0%, 9.6% and 0% (p=0.229). When the overall survival in all groups was examined, no significant difference was found between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, no adjuvant treatment is a proper approach for low-risk patients. Brachytherapy can be considered a suitable option for the intermediate risk group. Combined treatments instead of VB in the high-intermediate risk group would be preferred in terms of local control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"308-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/14/TJOG-19-308.PMC9748865.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.47835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.47835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨早期子宫内膜癌术后阴道近距离放射治疗(VB)的效果。材料与方法:回顾性分析1998年~ 2018年接受辅助治疗的I-II期子宫内膜腺癌患者。结果:共纳入618例患者。在409例低危组患者中,发现VB组阴道、盆腔复发率和远处转移率较高。当对112例中危组患者的结果进行评估时,阴道、盆腔复发率和远处转移率之间无统计学差异。89例中高危组患者中,VB、外束放疗、联合放疗及随访组阴道复发率分别为0%、4.8%、0%、25% (p=0.010),盆腔复发率分别为18.2%、0%、1.9%、0% (p=0.036)。远处转移率分别为0%、0%、9.6%和0% (p=0.229)。各组总生存率比较,各组间无明显差异。结论:无辅助治疗是低危患者的合适选择。对于中等风险人群,近距离放疗是一种合适的选择。在局部控制方面,中高危组首选联合治疗代替VB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of vaginal brachytherapy for treating early-stage endometrial cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology 2020 risk stratification.

Evaluation of vaginal brachytherapy for treating early-stage endometrial cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology 2020 risk stratification.

Evaluation of vaginal brachytherapy for treating early-stage endometrial cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology 2020 risk stratification.

Evaluation of vaginal brachytherapy for treating early-stage endometrial cancer according to the European Society of Medical Oncology 2020 risk stratification.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate vaginal brachytherapy (VB) after surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer.

Materials and methods: The patients with Stage I-II endometrial adeno-cancer operated between 1998 and 2018 and whose adjuvant therapies had been arranged were evaluated retrospectively.

Results: A total of 618 patients were enrolled. In 409 patients in the low-risk group, the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were found to be higher in the VB group. When the results of 112 patients in the intermediate-risk group were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between the vaginal, pelvic recurrence, and distance metastasis rates. In 89 patients in the intermediate-high risk group, vaginal recurrence rates were 0%, 4.8%, 0%, and 25% for VB, external beam radiotherapy, combination radiotherapy, and the follow-up groups, respectively (p=0.010), and pelvic recurrence rates were found to be 18.2%, 0%, 1.9% and 0% (p=0.036). Distant metastasis rates were 0%, 0%, 9.6% and 0% (p=0.229). When the overall survival in all groups was examined, no significant difference was found between the groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, no adjuvant treatment is a proper approach for low-risk patients. Brachytherapy can be considered a suitable option for the intermediate risk group. Combined treatments instead of VB in the high-intermediate risk group would be preferred in terms of local control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信