基于 16S rRNA 基因测序的骨质疏松症患者肠道微生物群变化:系统综述与荟萃分析。

Rui Huang, Pan Liu, Yiguang Bai, Jieqiong Huang, Rui Pan, Huihua Li, Yeping Su, Quan Zhou, Ruixin Ma, Shaohui Zong, Gaofeng Zeng
{"title":"基于 16S rRNA 基因测序的骨质疏松症患者肠道微生物群变化:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Rui Huang, Pan Liu, Yiguang Bai, Jieqiong Huang, Rui Pan, Huihua Li, Yeping Su, Quan Zhou, Ruixin Ma, Shaohui Zong, Gaofeng Zeng","doi":"10.1631/jzus.B2200344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>: Osteoporosis (OP) has become a major public health issue, threatening the bone health of middle-aged and elderly people from all around the world. Changes in the gut microbiota (GM) are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial, and no systematic review or meta-analysis of the relationship between GM and OP has been conducted. This paper addresses this shortcoming, focusing on the difference in the GM abundance between OP patients and healthy controls based on previous 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing results, in order to provide new clinical reference information for future customized prevention and treatment options of OP. <b>METHODS</b>: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). In addition, we applied the R programming language version 4.0.3 and Stata 15.1 software for data analysis. We also implemented the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, and Begg's test to assess the risk of bias. <b>RESULTS</b>: This research ultimately considered 12 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2033 people (604 with OP and 1429 healthy controls). In the included research papers, it was observed that the relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Ruminococcus</i> increased in the OP group, while the relative abundance for <i>Bacteroides</i> of Bacteroidetes increased (except for Ireland). Meanwhile, Firmicutes, <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Alistipes</i>, <i>Megamonas</i>, and <i>Anaerostipes</i> showed reduced relative abundance in Chinese studies. In the linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis, certain bacteria showed statistically significant results consistently across different studies. <b>CONCLUSIONS</b>: This observational meta-analysis revealed that changes in the GM were correlated with OP, and variations in some advantageous GM might involve regional differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":17601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B","volume":"23 12","pages":"1002-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758719/pdf/JZhejiangUnivSciB-23-12-1002.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the gut microbiota of osteoporosis patients based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Huang, Pan Liu, Yiguang Bai, Jieqiong Huang, Rui Pan, Huihua Li, Yeping Su, Quan Zhou, Ruixin Ma, Shaohui Zong, Gaofeng Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1631/jzus.B2200344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND</b>: Osteoporosis (OP) has become a major public health issue, threatening the bone health of middle-aged and elderly people from all around the world. Changes in the gut microbiota (GM) are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial, and no systematic review or meta-analysis of the relationship between GM and OP has been conducted. This paper addresses this shortcoming, focusing on the difference in the GM abundance between OP patients and healthy controls based on previous 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing results, in order to provide new clinical reference information for future customized prevention and treatment options of OP. <b>METHODS</b>: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). In addition, we applied the R programming language version 4.0.3 and Stata 15.1 software for data analysis. We also implemented the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, and Begg's test to assess the risk of bias. <b>RESULTS</b>: This research ultimately considered 12 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2033 people (604 with OP and 1429 healthy controls). In the included research papers, it was observed that the relative abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Ruminococcus</i> increased in the OP group, while the relative abundance for <i>Bacteroides</i> of Bacteroidetes increased (except for Ireland). Meanwhile, Firmicutes, <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Alistipes</i>, <i>Megamonas</i>, and <i>Anaerostipes</i> showed reduced relative abundance in Chinese studies. In the linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis, certain bacteria showed statistically significant results consistently across different studies. <b>CONCLUSIONS</b>: This observational meta-analysis revealed that changes in the GM were correlated with OP, and variations in some advantageous GM might involve regional differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B\",\"volume\":\"23 12\",\"pages\":\"1002-1013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758719/pdf/JZhejiangUnivSciB-23-12-1002.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2200344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2200344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨质疏松症(OP)已成为一个重大的公共卫生问题,威胁着世界各地中老年人的骨骼健康。肠道微生物群(GM)的变化与骨量和骨质的维持有关。然而,该领域的研究成果仍存在很大争议,也没有对 GM 与 OP 之间的关系进行系统回顾或荟萃分析。本文针对这一缺陷,基于以往的 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA)基因测序结果,重点研究 OP 患者与健康对照组之间 GM 丰度的差异,以期为今后定制 OP 预防和治疗方案提供新的临床参考信息。方法:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA),我们全面检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library 和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)等数据库。此外,我们还使用 R 编程语言 4.0.3 版和 Stata 15.1 软件进行数据分析。我们还采用了纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)、漏斗图分析、敏感性分析、Egger 检验和 Begg 检验来评估偏倚风险。结果:本研究最终考虑了 12 项研究,其中包括 2033 人(604 人患有 OP,1429 人为健康对照)的粪便基因组学数据。在纳入的研究论文中,可以观察到 OP 组中乳酸杆菌和反刍球菌的相对丰度增加,而类杆菌的相对丰度增加(爱尔兰除外)。与此同时,在中国的研究中,真菌纲、布劳氏菌纲、阿利氏菌纲、巨菌纲和厌氧菌纲的相对丰度有所下降。在线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)分析中,某些细菌在不同的研究中显示出一致的统计学显著结果。结论:这项观察性荟萃分析表明,转基因的变化与 OP 相关,某些优势转基因的变化可能与地区差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in the gut microbiota of osteoporosis patients based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis (OP) has become a major public health issue, threatening the bone health of middle-aged and elderly people from all around the world. Changes in the gut microbiota (GM) are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial, and no systematic review or meta-analysis of the relationship between GM and OP has been conducted. This paper addresses this shortcoming, focusing on the difference in the GM abundance between OP patients and healthy controls based on previous 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing results, in order to provide new clinical reference information for future customized prevention and treatment options of OP. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). In addition, we applied the R programming language version 4.0.3 and Stata 15.1 software for data analysis. We also implemented the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, and Begg's test to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: This research ultimately considered 12 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2033 people (604 with OP and 1429 healthy controls). In the included research papers, it was observed that the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Ruminococcus increased in the OP group, while the relative abundance for Bacteroides of Bacteroidetes increased (except for Ireland). Meanwhile, Firmicutes, Blautia, Alistipes, Megamonas, and Anaerostipes showed reduced relative abundance in Chinese studies. In the linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis, certain bacteria showed statistically significant results consistently across different studies. CONCLUSIONS: This observational meta-analysis revealed that changes in the GM were correlated with OP, and variations in some advantageous GM might involve regional differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信