青少年感化官在循证实践中的误解和意义。

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Victims & Offenders Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670

Sydney N Ingel, Lynnea R Davis, Danielle S Rudes, Taylor N Hartwell, Tess K Drazdowski, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow

{"title":"青少年感化官在循证实践中的误解和意义。","authors":"Sydney N Ingel, Lynnea R Davis, Danielle S Rudes, Taylor N Hartwell, Tess K Drazdowski, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow","doi":"10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based practices and programs (EBPs) have been adopted in juvenile probation agencies nationwide to maximize the number of successful probation cases. However, various pragmatic studies have found that JPOs are not yielding the expected benefits when compared to efficacy studies (Lipsey et al., 2010; Taxman & Belenko, 2011). Using focus group and survey data, the current study sought to increase our understanding of the gap between pragmatic and efficacy studies in juvenile probation settings by examining JPOs' perceptions and utilization of EBPs. The findings suggest that JPOs are misunderstanding how to use EBPs in daily practice, leaving them with negative perceptions of EBPs. Implications for improving JPO understanding and use of EBPs are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47085,"journal":{"name":"Victims & Offenders","volume":"17 7","pages":"975-993"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793856/pdf/nihms-1746028.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misunderstanding and Sensemaking Among Juvenile Probation Officers Working with Evidence-Based Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney N Ingel, Lynnea R Davis, Danielle S Rudes, Taylor N Hartwell, Tess K Drazdowski, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence-based practices and programs (EBPs) have been adopted in juvenile probation agencies nationwide to maximize the number of successful probation cases. However, various pragmatic studies have found that JPOs are not yielding the expected benefits when compared to efficacy studies (Lipsey et al., 2010; Taxman & Belenko, 2011). Using focus group and survey data, the current study sought to increase our understanding of the gap between pragmatic and efficacy studies in juvenile probation settings by examining JPOs' perceptions and utilization of EBPs. The findings suggest that JPOs are misunderstanding how to use EBPs in daily practice, leaving them with negative perceptions of EBPs. Implications for improving JPO understanding and use of EBPs are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"975-993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793856/pdf/nihms-1746028.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Victims & Offenders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victims & Offenders","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1985670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

全国各地的青少年缓刑机构都采用了循证实践和项目(ebp)，以最大限度地提高缓刑成功案例的数量。然而，各种实用研究发现，与疗效研究相比，jpo并没有产生预期的益处(Lipsey et al.， 2010;Taxman & Belenko, 2011)。本研究利用焦点小组和调查数据，通过考察青少年缓刑人员对ebp的认知和利用，试图加深我们对青少年缓刑环境中实用性和有效性研究之间差距的理解。研究结果表明，jpo误解了如何在日常实践中使用ebp，使他们对ebp产生负面看法。讨论了提高JPO对ebp的理解和使用的意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Misunderstanding and Sensemaking Among Juvenile Probation Officers Working with Evidence-Based Practices.

Evidence-based practices and programs (EBPs) have been adopted in juvenile probation agencies nationwide to maximize the number of successful probation cases. However, various pragmatic studies have found that JPOs are not yielding the expected benefits when compared to efficacy studies (Lipsey et al., 2010; Taxman & Belenko, 2011). Using focus group and survey data, the current study sought to increase our understanding of the gap between pragmatic and efficacy studies in juvenile probation settings by examining JPOs' perceptions and utilization of EBPs. The findings suggest that JPOs are misunderstanding how to use EBPs in daily practice, leaving them with negative perceptions of EBPs. Implications for improving JPO understanding and use of EBPs are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Victims & Offenders CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Victims & Offenders is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the dissemination of new research, policies, and practices related to both victimization and offending throughout the life course. Our aim is to provide an opportunity for researchers -- both in the United States and internationally -- from a wide range of disciplines (criminal justice, psychology, sociology, political science, economics, public health, and social work) to publish articles that examine issues from a variety of perspectives in a unique, interdisciplinary forum. We are interested in both quantitative and qualitative research, systematic, evidence-based reviews, and articles that focus on theory development related to offenders and victims.